美国互联网案件中的长臂管辖权探究

发布时间：2018-06-17 12:26

本文选题：互联网 + 长臂管辖权　；参考：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：美国的长臂管辖权是指当非法院地居民与法院地间存在某种限度的联系,同时原告提起的诉讼又产生于这种联系时,法院对被告所主张的管辖权。在行使司法管辖权时,作为一项原则,现代国际法要求在被告与法院地之间有一种较为密切的诉前关系。美国的互联网案件管辖权制度强调被告与法院地之间是否形成了某种程度的联系,这种寻找争议案件的被告与法院地内在关系的管辖权标准,因其自身的弹性更能适合复杂的法律关系的变化,适合本国利益保护的需要。本文第一章主要介绍长臂管辖权的概念、产生背景、理论基础和行使条件,对长臂管辖权有一个宏观的理解。第二章着重阐释长臂管辖权在司法实践当中运用的一系列用于确定“联系点”的司法技术,如“滑动标尺”分析方法、“效果规则”以及“进一步活动”说;并结合经典案例对这些分析方法的实践有效性和不足作进一步论述。第三章首先介绍了国内外学者对长臂管辖权在互联网案件中的运用褒贬不一的评价,然后提出了本文对此所持的态度,并得出美国做法对全球普遍的互联网案件管辖权问题的思考和启示。
[Abstract]:The long-arm jurisdiction of the United States refers to the jurisdiction claimed by the court against the defendant when there is a certain degree of connection between the residents of the non-forum and the forum, and the litigation initiated by the plaintiff arises from this connection. In the exercise of jurisdiction, as a principle, modern international law requires a close pre-litigation relationship between the defendant and the forum. The Internet case jurisdiction system in the United States emphasizes whether there is a certain degree of connection between the defendant and the forum, which is the jurisdictional standard for searching for the inherent relationship between the defendant and the court in a dispute case. Because of its flexibility, it is more suitable for the changes of complex legal relations and the needs of the protection of national interests. The first chapter mainly introduces the concept of long arm jurisdiction, the background, theoretical basis and exercise conditions, and has a macro understanding of long arm jurisdiction. The second chapter focuses on a series of judicial techniques used to determine "contact points" used in judicial practice, such as "sliding scale" analysis method, "effect rules" and "further activities". Combined with classical cases, the practical effectiveness and shortcomings of these analytical methods are further discussed. The third chapter first introduces the domestic and foreign scholars on the application of long-arm jurisdiction in Internet cases, and then puts forward the attitude of this paper. And draw the American practice to the global universal Internet case jurisdiction question ponder and enlighten.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】