新产品制造方法专利保护判例研究

发布时间：2018-06-18 07:58

本文选题：新产品制造方法 + 专利保护　；参考：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国经济转型的逐渐深化以及国家对知识产权的日益重视，我国专利事业取得了长足发展，专利法律制度也日臻完善。但是在专利侵权诉讼中，，尤其是在新产品制造方法专利侵权诉讼中，还存在着很多法律适用方面的争议和问题。虽然最高院2009年发布了《最高人民法院关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释》，但是该解释依然未能解决我国在新产品制造方法专利司法保护中存在的许多深层次问题。本文系统讨论了新产品制造方法专利保护制度所存在的诸多问题及成因，并在借鉴国外相关司法实践的基础上提出完善相应法律制度的建设性意见。基于以上研究思路，本文研究内容主要包括以下三章：第一章分析了新产品制造方法专利保护制度的整体构成并探讨了制度背后的理论基础。第二章探讨了新产品制造方法专利保护制度在司法实践中所存在的主要问题及问题成因。主要从方法专利“延伸保护”制度以及新产品制造方法专利举证责任倒置制度两个方面进行研究。认为方法专利延伸保护制度所存在的主要问题在于对“延伸保护范围”的界定过于狭窄；而在新产品制造方法专利举证责任倒置制度方面所存在的主要问题包括四个方面：第一、相关法律制度适用过程中对于“新产品”和“相同产品”的认定存在问题；第二、举证责任倒置制度与商业秘密的保护存在冲突；第三、举证责任倒置制度缺乏时效规定，容易导致制度的滥用，从而侵犯公众利益；第四、新产品制造方法专利保护举证过程中司法鉴定程序存在问题，司法鉴定结论缺乏公信力。第三章结合方法专利“延伸保护”制度与新产品制造方法专利举证责任倒置制度的国外司法实践，提出解决我国新产品制造方法专利保护制度所存在问题的基本思路，并提出了完善制度的具体构想。在方法专利“延伸保护范围”界定方面，建议改变狭义的认定标准，引入“本性损害检验法”概念，结合美国专利法实践，合理扩大我国方法专利“延伸保护”制度保护的范围；在新产品制造方法举证责任倒置制度方面，主要提出了三个方面建议：首先，在举证责任倒置制度判定标准方面，建议采用《TRIPS协议》第三十四条方案（b），避免过于复杂的判定过程；其次，在举证责任倒置制度时效设置方面，建议建立分类具体的举证责任倒置制度适用时效体系，实现方法专利权人利益与公众利益的平衡；最后，在新产品制造方法专利中核心的技术问题判定环节，建议出台具体的知识产权司法鉴定规则，建立健全的知识产权司法鉴定相关制度，提高专利诉讼的效率和公正性。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of China's economic transformation and the increasing attention paid to intellectual property rights, the patent industry in China has made great progress, and the patent legal system is also becoming more and more perfect. But in the patent infringement litigation, especially in the new product manufacturing method patent infringement litigation, there are still many disputes and problems in the application of the law. Although the Supreme people's Court issued the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of Law in cases of Patent infringement in 2009, this interpretation still fails to solve the problem of judicial protection of patent for new product manufacturing methods in China. There are many deep problems. This paper systematically discusses the problems and causes of patent protection system of new product manufacturing methods, and puts forward some constructive suggestions on how to perfect the corresponding legal system on the basis of drawing lessons from the relevant judicial practice in foreign countries. Based on the above research ideas, this paper mainly includes the following three chapters: the first chapter analyzes the overall composition of the patent protection system of new product manufacturing methods and discusses the theoretical basis behind the system. The second chapter discusses the main problems and causes of the patent protection system in the judicial practice. This paper mainly studies the extension protection system of method patent and the inverted burden of proof system of new product manufacturing method patent. The main problem of the method patent extension protection system is that the definition of "extended protection scope" is too narrow; There are four main problems in the reverse system of burden of proof in the new product manufacturing method patent: first, there are problems in the identification of "new product" and "same product" in the process of application of relevant legal system; second, there are problems in the identification of the "new product" and "the same product" in the process of application of the relevant legal system. The system of inversion of burden of proof and the protection of trade secrets conflict; third, the system of inversion of burden of proof is short of statute of limitations, which can easily lead to the abuse of the system, thus infringing the public interest; fourth, There are some problems in the procedure of forensic identification in the process of patent protection of new product manufacturing method, and the conclusion of judicial expertise lacks credibility. The third chapter puts forward the basic ideas to solve the problems existing in the patent protection system of new product manufacturing method, combining with the foreign judicial practice of the "extended protection" system of method patent and the inversion of the burden of proof of the new product manufacturing method patent. And put forward the concrete idea of perfecting the system. In the definition of "extended scope of protection" of method patent, it is suggested to change the narrow identification standard, introduce the concept of "nature damage test", and combine with the practice of patent law in the United States. This paper reasonably expands the scope of the "extended protection" system of the method patent in our country, and puts forward three suggestions on the inversion of the burden of proof in the new product manufacturing method: first, in the judgment standard of the inverted system of the burden of proof, It is suggested to adopt Article 34 of trips Agreement to avoid too complicated judgment process. Secondly, in the aspect of prescription setting of burden of proof inversion system, it is suggested to establish a specific prescription system for inversion of burden of proof system. Realizing the balance between the interests of the method patentee and the public interest. Finally, it is suggested that specific rules for the judicial identification of intellectual property should be issued in the key technical issues in the patent for the manufacturing method of new products. Establish a sound system of intellectual property judicial expertise, improve the efficiency and fairness of patent litigation.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.42;D997.1

【参考文献】