信用证独立性原则下我国信用证欺诈的立法与司法实践研究
发布时间:2018-06-26 12:25
本文选题:信用证独立性原则 + 信用证欺诈 ; 参考:《新疆大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:自我国加入WTO之后,经济发展迅速,外贸进出口额也有了很大的增长。在经济迅速发展的同时,国际结算业务也发展迅猛,,而作为现代国际结算工具的信用证的运用更加广泛。据相关数据统计,我国80%的国际结算业务是通过信用证来完成的。由于信用证单据交易和其独立于基础交易的特点,使得信用证欺诈越来越频繁的出现在国际结算过程中。更由于我国信用证结算业务起步较晚,银行与企业对此种结算工具并不熟练,经常面临被欺诈的危险。早期的司法实践,出于对本国企业与银行的保护,只要企业或银行提出可能存在信用证欺诈就轻易冻结信用证项下款项,使得国内银行在国外的分行常常被起诉,并承担败诉的责任。本文从我国审理信用证欺诈的司法实践出发,通过与英美法系和大陆法系一些国家在信用证欺诈立法方面以及司法实践方面的比较,发现我国在信用证欺诈立法上的不足,并提出解决意见,以求能对我国信用证欺诈的立法提供一些有价值的参考资料。
[Abstract]:Since China's entry into WTO, the economy has developed rapidly, and the import and export volume of foreign trade has also greatly increased. With the rapid development of economy, the international settlement business also develops rapidly, and the letter of credit, as a modern international settlement tool, is more widely used. According to the relevant statistics, 80% of the international settlement business is completed by letter of credit. Because of the characteristics of documentary transactions and their independence from basic transactions, letter of credit fraud appears more and more frequently in the process of international settlement. Because of the late start of L / C settlement in our country, banks and enterprises are not proficient in this kind of settlement instruments and are often faced with the risk of fraud. In early judicial practice, out of the protection of domestic enterprises and banks, as long as the enterprises or banks suggested that there might be letter of credit fraud, it was easy to freeze the funds under the letters of credit, so that branches of domestic banks abroad were often prosecuted. And bear the responsibility for losing the case. Starting from the judicial practice of handling letter of credit fraud in our country and comparing it with the legislation and judicial practice of letter of credit fraud in some countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, this paper finds out the deficiency in the legislation of letter of credit fraud in our country. In order to provide some valuable reference for the legislation of letter of credit fraud in China, the author puts forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:新疆大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 江锦莲,杜明;重构我国信用证欺诈例外制度的若干问题研究——兼评最高人民法院《关于信用证纠纷案件若干问题的规定(讨论稿)》[J];商业研究;2004年04期
2 王鹏;;关于信用证项下款项的中止支付问题[J];国际商务财会;2009年12期
3 陈竞;信用证欺诈情况下法院发布止付令的合法性问题研究[J];当代法学;1999年04期
4 徐s
本文编号:2070378
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2070378.html