欧盟“双重民主赤字”问题与成员国议会在欧盟决策中的参与

发布时间：2018-07-01 15:14

本文选题：欧盟成员国议会 + 双重民主赤字　；参考：《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：以代议制民主为基础的欧盟,其“民主赤字”问题也首先表现为代议制民主的“议会民主赤字”(Parliamentary Deficit)。在以往的研究中,围绕欧盟“民主赤字”问题的讨论主要是围绕欧洲议会展开的。随着欧洲一体化进程的深化以及对“民主赤字”问题的深入探讨,欧洲学者们开始意识到欧盟的“议会民主赤字”不仅仅存在于欧洲议会,另一个代议制机构——成员国议会,也存在“民主赤字”问题。这被认为是欧盟的“双重民主赤字"(Double democratic deficit),即在欧洲议会和成员国议会都存在着“民主赤字”。本论文将着重对成员国议会的“民主赤字”问题进行研究。这一问题表现在两个层面。在欧盟层面,成员国议会在一体化进程中上交的一部分权力被授予了欧盟委员会和理事会,而不是欧洲议会；即使最近几次的欧盟条约修订赋予了欧洲议会更大的权力,但由于欧洲议会选举的低投票率,欧洲议会自身的合法性也存在一定的疑问。因此,成员国议会应该作为欧洲议会代议制民主的补充,更多地参与到欧盟层面的决策过程中。在国家层面,由于欧盟的超国家性,成员国议会也需要从传统的国家议会向欧盟成员国的国家议会转变,在国家层面的欧盟事务决策中发挥更大作用。但转型中的成员国议会缺乏对国家层面欧盟事务的有效参与,因此在这一方面也存在“民主赤字”。本文的引言部分将陈述选题缘由及对研究现状进行梳理。第一章以历史的角度,回顾从煤钢共同体建立初期到制宪会议前,成员国议会在一体化发展历程中所扮演的角色,从而引出对于成员国议会“民主赤字”问题的思考。第二章就欧盟的“双重民主赤字”,尤其是成员国议会的“民主赤字”问题进行阐述,深入讨论其两个维度。第三章探讨欧盟制宪进程和《里斯本条约》对成员国议会作用的改革设想,分析改革后成员国议会在欧盟决策中的参与,以及欧盟解决成员国议会“民主赤字”的现有方案所面临的困境和挑战。
[Abstract]:On the basis of representative democracy, the European Union's "democratic deficit" is also the parliamentary deficit of representative democracy. In previous studies, the debate over the EU's democratic deficit has centred on the European Parliament. With the deepening of the process of European integration and the in-depth discussion of the issue of "democratic deficit", European scholars are beginning to realize that the "parliamentary democratic deficit" of the EU exists not only in the European Parliament, but also in the parliaments of member States, another representative body. There is also a "democratic deficit" problem. This is thought to be the "double democratic deficit)," of the European Union, where there is a "democratic deficit" in both the European Parliament and the member parliaments. This paper will focus on the issue of "democratic deficit" in member parliaments. The problem manifests itself on two levels. At the EU level, some of the powers handed over by member parliaments in the integration process have been delegated to the European Commission and the Council, rather than to the European Parliament; even though recent EU treaty amendments have given the European Parliament greater powers, But the European Parliament's own legitimacy is in doubt because of the low turnout in parliamentary elections. As a result, member parliaments should be more involved in EU-level decision-making as a complement to representative democracy in the European Parliament. At the national level, due to the supranational nature of the EU, member parliaments also need to change from the traditional national parliaments to the national parliaments of the EU member states and play a greater role in EU decision-making at the national level. But the transition member parliaments lack effective participation in EU affairs at the national level, so there are also "democratic deficits" in this area. The introduction of this paper will state the reasons for the topic and the status quo of the research. The first chapter reviews the role played by member parliaments in the process of integration development from the beginning of the coal and steel community to the Constituent Assembly, which leads to the consideration of the issue of "democratic deficit" in the parliaments of member States. The second chapter expounds the "double democratic deficit" of the EU, especially the "democratic deficit" of the member parliaments, and discusses its two dimensions in depth. The third chapter discusses the reform of the role of the member parliaments in the EU constitution-making process and the Lisbon Treaty, and analyzes the participation of the member parliaments in the EU decision-making after the reform. And the difficulties and challenges of the EU's existing solutions to the "democratic deficit" of member parliaments.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：F15

【参考文献】