中国—东盟民事司法协助制度统一化问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-06 08:47

本文选题：中国-东盟 + 民事司法协助制度　；参考：《广西师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着中国-东盟自由贸易区的全面启动,中国与东盟在各领域的合作不断扩大和深入,尤其经贸往来频繁,边贸纠纷日益增多,中国涉东盟各国民商事案件也逐年递增。要解决这些涉外民商事诉讼,必然会涉及国际民事司法协助的各项制度,即域外送达、域外调查取证、外国法院民事判决或仲裁裁决的承认与执行等,这些环节将直接影响到审判的进行及裁判的效力。但目前中国-东盟关于民事司法协助的立法还比较匮乏,中国仅与泰国、新加坡、越南、老挝四个东盟国家签订了有关民事司法协助的双边条约,而且条约内容还不够全面,各国国内法的规定也存在较大差异,而实践中更是效率低下甚至无法开展。因此,本文以构建统一的中国-东盟民事司法协助制度为主旨,在由双边协定逐步过渡到多边统一的民事司法协助公约这个统一化途径的前提下,运用比较分析、文献研究以及从宏观到微观的综合分析方法,对如何统一和完善民事司法协助的各项制度提出了一些建议。全文分为四大部分：引言,介绍了课题研究的背景、意义和国内外研究现状。通过分析中国与东盟之间民事司法协助存在的问题,指出民事司法协助机制缺失和难以操作是其核心所在；通过介绍国内外在该领域的研究现状,指出了统一和完善中国-东盟民事司法协助制度这一论题的重要性。第一部分,对国际民事司法协助的基本理论进行介绍,包括国际民事司法协助的概念、范围和基本原则,以及国际民事司法协助的依据。第二部分,对构建统一的中国-东盟民事司法协助制度的必要性和可行性进行分析。以中国-东盟关系发展的现实需要和当前民事司法协助存在的问题来凸显统一中国-东盟民事司法协助制度的必要性；以中国-东盟长期以来的交流合作和已有的法律协议以及其他国际组织统一民事司法协助制度的成功范式来证实其可行性；最后对构建统一的中国-东盟民事司法协助制度所面临的几个主要问题进行了分析。第三部分,对统一中国-东盟民事司法协助制度的模式选择进行了分析。通过对当前比较有代表性的三种统一民事司法协助立法模式进行比较分析之后,认为由双边协定逐步过渡到多边统一的民事司法协助公约是当前比较适合中国-东盟自由贸易区的立法模式。第四部分,在上文提出的由双边协定过渡到多边公约的这一框架下对民事司法协助制度的各项具体内容进行构建和完善,即域外送达、域外取证、外国法院民事判决及外国仲裁裁决的承认与执行这几项制度,尤其是要把外国法院判决的承认与执行纳入到中国-东盟的民事司法协助制度体系中来。鉴于达成综合性的民事司法协助多边公约比较困难,可以尝试针对民事司法协助的各项制度分别达成专门性的公约。最后部分为结论,对全文进行概括总结,在如何求同存异协调东盟各国达成统一的民事司法协助制度问题上进一步阐述了自己的看法,要求各国对国内法进行调整,在这个过程中可以借鉴美国示范法方式。最后概括强调了完善立法的过程中要注意的一些制度设计问题。
[Abstract]:With the full start of the China ASEAN Free Trade Area, the cooperation between China and ASEAN is expanding and deepening in various fields, especially the economic and trade exchanges, the increasing number of disputes over the border trade, and the increasing number of civil and commercial cases involving ASEAN in China. Degree, namely, extraterritorial delivery, extraterritorial investigation and forensics, the recognition and enforcement of civil judgments or arbitral awards of foreign courts, and so on. These links will directly affect the conduct of the trial and the effectiveness of the referees. However, the legislation of China ASEAN on civil judicial assistance is still scarce, and China has signed only four ASEAN countries in Thailand, Singapore, Vietnam and Laos. Bilateral treaties on civil judicial assistance have been booked, and the contents of the treaties are not comprehensive enough, and the provisions of domestic laws in various countries are also different. In practice, it is more inefficient or even impossible to carry out in practice.
Therefore, this paper, based on the establishment of a unified China ASEAN civil judicial assistance system, is based on a unified approach to the multilateral and unified civil judicial assistance convention from bilateral agreements, and uses comparative analysis, literature research and comprehensive analysis from macro to micro to how to unify and improve civil justice. There are some suggestions for the various systems of assistance. The full text is divided into four parts:
This paper introduces the background, significance and present situation of research at home and abroad. Through the analysis of the existing problems of civil judicial assistance between China and ASEAN, it points out that the lack and difficulty of the civil judicial assistance mechanism is its core. By introducing the research status in this field at home and abroad, it points out the unification and improvement of the Chinese ASEAN people. The importance of the issue of the system of judicial assistance.
In the first part, the basic theories of international civil judicial assistance are introduced, including the concept, scope and basic principles of international civil judicial assistance, as well as the basis for international civil judicial assistance.
In the second part, the necessity and feasibility of building a unified China ASEAN civil judicial assistance system is analyzed. The necessity of unified China ASEAN civil judicial assistance system is highlighted by the practical needs of the development of China ASEAN Relations and the existing problems of the current civil judicial assistance. On the basis of the existing legal agreements and the successful paradigm of the unified civil judicial assistance system of other international organizations, it confirms its feasibility, and finally analyzes several major problems faced by the establishment of a unified China ASEAN civil judicial assistance system.
The third part analyzes the mode selection of the unified China ASEAN civil judicial assistance system. After a comparative analysis of the three representative legislative modes of unified civil judicial assistance, it is considered that the gradual transition from bilateral agreements to the multilateral and unified civil judicial assistance convention is currently suitable for China East. The legislative model of the free trade zone of the league.
In the fourth part, under the framework of the transition from bilateral agreements to multilateral conventions, the specific contents of the civil judicial assistance system are constructed and perfected, namely, extraterritorial delivery, extraterritorial forensics, the recognition and enforcement of foreign courts' civil judgments and foreign arbitral awards, especially the judgment of foreign courts. Recognition and implementation are included in China East
In the system of the civil judicial assistance system of the league, in view of the difficulty in achieving a comprehensive Multilateral Convention on civil judicial assistance, it is possible to attempt to reach a special Convention for the various systems of civil judicial assistance.
The last part is a conclusion, and a summary of the full text is made. Some system design problems should be paid attention to in the course of the process.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D997.3

【参考文献】