南海仲裁案的影响与应对分析

发布时间：2018-07-17 20:03

【摘要】：中国政府认为南海仲裁案仲裁庭对于该案件没有管辖权,而且案件不具备可采性。仲裁庭裁决中国超越《联合国海洋法公约》规定海域制度之外的任何基于"九段线"的海域权利诉求均没有法律依据,南沙诸岛的高潮地物均不是岛屿,中国不能以南沙群岛为整体划定领海基线并声索海域权利。南海仲裁案裁决给中国造成了负面的影响,但也启示中国反思自身南海政策的不成熟之处,调整后续对策。中国应从程序上规避《联合国海洋法公约》导致有拘束力裁判的强制程序的管辖,推进协商规范,提倡与东盟成员国建立南海争端仲裁庭;在加强太平岛等岛礁岛屿地位的举证方面促进两岸合作,建立岛屿指标体系和南海岛礁大数据库。
[Abstract]:The Chinese government believes that the South China Sea arbitration tribunal has no jurisdiction over the case and that the case is not admissible. The arbitral tribunal ruled that there is no legal basis for any maritime claims based on the "nine-dash line" beyond the maritime area regime stipulated by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and that the climax of the Nansha Islands is not an island. China cannot use the Nansha Islands as a whole to delineate the baselines of the territorial sea and claim maritime rights. The award of the South China Sea arbitration case has a negative impact on China, but it also enlightens China to reflect on the immaturity of its South China Sea policy and adjust its follow-up countermeasures. China should circumvent the jurisdiction of the compulsory procedure of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea which leads to binding adjudication, promote consultation norms, and advocate the establishment of an arbitration tribunal for disputes in the South China Sea with ASEAN member countries. In the aspect of strengthening the proof of Taiping Island and other reef islands, the cooperation between the two sides should be promoted, and the island index system and the large database of the South China Sea islands and reefs should be established.
【作者单位】：中共海南省委党校公共管理教研部;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“我国南海岛礁所涉重大现实问题及其对策研究”(16ZDA073);国家社科基金青年项目“《联合国海洋法公约》在南海争端中的效用及中国对策研究”(13CGJ037)
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】