国际商事仲裁禁诉令制度研究

发布时间：2018-07-18 10:18

【摘要】：随着国际间经济贸易往来的日益繁荣,国际商事仲裁基于其自身便捷、公正、快速等优点获得了越来越多的当事人认可,其在国际贸易争端解决中扮演着越来越重要的角色,为避免当事人违反仲裁协议到另一国法院诉讼,英美法系和一些大陆法系国家通常采用签发禁诉令的方式支持仲裁,但是禁诉令制度在司法实践中一直因有违背“国际礼让原则”之嫌而备受诟病。目前外国法院向我国一方当事人签发禁诉令的情况时有发生,但国内尚未建构相应制度用以应对,针对这一情况本文通过对英美法系和大陆法系国家禁诉令制度的司法实践进行比较与分析,并结合国际商事仲裁的自身规律及特点,为我国国际商事仲裁领域相关禁诉令制度的建构提供相应建议。具体而言,本文包括:第一部分为“国际商事仲裁禁诉令的基本理论”。本部分首先考察了禁诉令制度的历史,梳理禁诉令制度的演进历程,区分对比了国际商事仲裁的禁诉令制度与国际民商事诉讼中的禁诉令制度,厘清了两种不同的禁诉令的适用条件与范围。然后分析了禁诉令制度在国际商事仲裁中的独特作用。文章认为,禁诉令制度在国际商事仲裁中的作用主要在于,维系仲裁条约之权利义务以及维系仲裁之尊严,防止无理取闹且具有压迫性质的行为。最后探讨了国际商事仲裁禁诉令制度的理论基础。文章认为,当事人意思自治原则、支持仲裁原则、国际礼让原则和既得权说等原则和理论都能在一定程度上解释说明在国际商事仲裁中采用禁诉令制度的必要性和合理性。第二部分为“国际商事仲裁禁诉令制度的立法与实践”。本部分首先梳理了国际公约的相关规定,着重于影响较大的《布鲁塞尔公约》体系、《纽约公约》和《联合国国际商事仲裁示范法》,文章通过若干案例阐释了在当前国际商事仲裁领域国际条约的应用现状。其次,在域外国家立法与实践中,文章以英国、美国为代表的英美法系和以德国、日本为代表的大陆法系两个方面具体介绍了该项制度在不同法域国家适用上的不同。第三部分为“我国国际商事仲裁禁诉令制度的构建”,本部分首先梳理了我国学界关于是否引入禁诉令制度的争论点,文章认为,若我国不引入或建立禁诉令制度将会对我国当事人的权利保护造成不便,产生风险隐患,对当事人财产及人身自由造成不利影响。其次,文章在国际商事仲裁领域总结英美法系和大陆法系国家相关经验与教训的基础上,分别以“签发”和“接受”两个角度对国际商事仲裁领域中禁诉令制度的构建提出政策建议。
[Abstract]:With the increasing prosperity of international economic and trade exchanges, international commercial arbitration has been recognized by more and more parties on the basis of its own advantages of convenience, fairness and speed, and it plays an increasingly important role in the settlement of international trade disputes. In order to prevent parties from violating an arbitration agreement in court in another country, common law and some civil law countries usually support arbitration by issuing injunctions, However, the injunction system has been criticized for violating the principle of international comity in judicial practice. At present, the situation that foreign courts issue injunctive orders to one of the parties in our country happens from time to time, but the corresponding system has not been constructed in our country to deal with it. In view of this situation, this paper compares and analyzes the judicial practice of the injunction system in Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and combines the law and characteristics of international commercial arbitration. To provide corresponding suggestions for the construction of relevant injunction system in the field of international commercial arbitration in China. Specifically, this paper includes: the first part is the basic theory of injunction in international commercial arbitration. This part first reviews the history of the injunction system, combs the evolution of the injunction system, and compares the injunction system of international commercial arbitration with the injunction system in international civil and commercial litigation. It clarifies the application conditions and scope of two different injunctions. Then it analyzes the unique role of injunction system in international commercial arbitration. The article holds that the function of injunction system in international commercial arbitration mainly lies in maintaining the rights and obligations of arbitration treaties and maintaining the dignity of arbitration so as to prevent unreasonable and oppressive acts. Finally, the theoretical basis of the injunction system of international commercial arbitration is discussed. The author holds that the principle of party autonomy, the principle of supporting arbitration, the principle of international comity and the doctrine of vested rights can explain to a certain extent the necessity and rationality of the application of injunction in international commercial arbitration. The second part is the legislation and practice of the injunction system of international commercial arbitration. This part firstly combs the relevant provisions of international conventions, Focusing on the influential Brussels Convention system, the New York Convention and the United Nations Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, this paper explains the current application of international treaties in the field of international commercial arbitration through several cases. Secondly, in the legislation and practice of foreign countries, the article introduces the differences in the application of this system in different jurisdictions from two aspects: Britain, the United States as the representative of the Anglo-American legal system and Germany and Japan as the representative of the continental law system. The third part is "the construction of the injunction system of international commercial arbitration in China". This part firstly combs the arguments about whether to introduce the injunction system in the academic circles of our country. If our country does not introduce or establish the injunction system, it will cause inconvenience to the protection of the rights of the litigants in our country, cause the risk hidden danger, and have adverse effects on the property and personal freedom of the parties concerned. Secondly, on the basis of summarizing the relevant experiences and lessons of common law and civil law countries in the field of international commercial arbitration, This paper puts forward policy suggestions on the construction of injunction system in the field of international commercial arbitration from the perspectives of "issuing" and "accepting" respectively.
【学位授予单位】：云南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】