国际投资法中公平与公正待遇标准探究
发布时间：2018-07-25 07:17
【摘要】：随着全球经济一体化与自由化进程的加快，国际投资发展迅速，国际投资待遇问题也成了研究的重点。国际投资法中的投资待遇主要包括三种，，分别是国民待遇、最惠国待遇和公平与公正待遇标准。发展至今，公平与公正待遇标准已经成为国际投资领域中不可或缺的投资待遇标准之一。就这三种待遇标准而言，国民待遇和最惠国待遇同被看做相对待遇标准，而公平与公正待遇标准则被作为一项绝对的待遇标准加以规定。国际投资条约已经普遍将公平与公正待遇标准规定为国际投资待遇标准之一，但是不同国家与学者对该待遇标准的含义还存在认识上的分歧。本文将理论联系实践，首先阐述了该待遇标准的缘起和发展，然后在结合国际条约中具体规定和国际仲裁实践的基础上分析其内涵及要素，厘清公平与公正待遇和其他投资待遇的关系，在文章最后笔者指出我国签订的多、双边投资条约中与该待遇标准相关的规定存在的不足，并提出与之对应的完善策略，尝试将公平与公正待遇标准引入立法。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of the process of global economic integration and liberalization, international investment has developed rapidly, and the treatment of international investment has become the focus of research. The investment treatment in international investment law mainly includes three kinds, namely national treatment, most-favoured-nation treatment and fair and just treatment standard. Up to now, the fair and just treatment standard has become one of the indispensable investment treatment standards in the field of international investment. In terms of these three treatment standards, national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment are regarded as relative treatment standards, while fair and just treatment standards are defined as an absolute standard of treatment. The standard of fair and just treatment has been generally defined as one of the standards of international investment treatment in international investment treaties, but different countries and scholars still have different views on the meaning of the standard of treatment. This paper combines theory with practice, first expounds the origin and development of the standard of treatment, then analyzes its connotation and elements on the basis of the specific provisions of international treaties and the practice of international arbitration. To clarify the relationship between fair and just treatment and other investment treatment, at the end of the article, the author points out the shortcomings of the relevant provisions of bilateral investment treaties (bits), and puts forward the corresponding improvement strategies. Try to introduce the fair and just treatment standard into the legislation.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4
本文编号：2143049
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of the process of global economic integration and liberalization, international investment has developed rapidly, and the treatment of international investment has become the focus of research. The investment treatment in international investment law mainly includes three kinds, namely national treatment, most-favoured-nation treatment and fair and just treatment standard. Up to now, the fair and just treatment standard has become one of the indispensable investment treatment standards in the field of international investment. In terms of these three treatment standards, national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment are regarded as relative treatment standards, while fair and just treatment standards are defined as an absolute standard of treatment. The standard of fair and just treatment has been generally defined as one of the standards of international investment treatment in international investment treaties, but different countries and scholars still have different views on the meaning of the standard of treatment. This paper combines theory with practice, first expounds the origin and development of the standard of treatment, then analyzes its connotation and elements on the basis of the specific provisions of international treaties and the practice of international arbitration. To clarify the relationship between fair and just treatment and other investment treatment, at the end of the article, the author points out the shortcomings of the relevant provisions of bilateral investment treaties (bits), and puts forward the corresponding improvement strategies. Try to introduce the fair and just treatment standard into the legislation.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王志永;超国民待遇研究[J];比较法研究;2004年05期
2 苏如飞;;中外双边投资协定中的公正公平待遇条款探析[J];西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
3 张莉;对我国外资待遇标准的重新审视[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年03期
4 邓婷婷;;外资公平与公正待遇与国际最低待遇标准[J];湖南社会科学;2009年06期
5 余劲松;外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J];法商研究;2005年06期
6 邹立刚;TRIMS协定与我国对外资的待遇标准[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1999年01期
7 余劲松;;中国发展过程中的外资准入阶段国民待遇问题[J];法学家;2004年06期
8 张庆麟;外商投资国民待遇若干问题之辨析[J];法学评论;1998年01期
9 徐崇利;;试论我国对外资实行国民待遇标准的问题[J];国际经济法论丛;1998年00期
10 沈伯明;对外商投资企业实行国民待遇[J];国际经济合作;1996年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 赵越;论国际投资条约中的公正与公平待遇标准[D];浙江工商大学;2010年
本文编号：2143049
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2143049.html
