国际商事仲裁证据规则研究
发布时间：2018-07-25 16:49
【摘要】：在国际民事诉讼中打官司就是打证据，这句话在国际商事仲裁中也同样适用。证据规则是国际商事仲裁中的重要理论问题之一，是裁判者认定案件事实做出公正公平裁决的重要手段，也关系到仲裁裁决是否符合公平与效率等现代商事仲裁对证据规则的基本要求。 本文以介绍两大法系中对证据规则的内涵界定开头，提出了本文对于证据规则的内涵的看法。接着重点论述了证据规则的概论方面，包括基本原则和价值取向。证据规则也涉及到法律适用的问题，，在理论探讨后，运用了举例例证的方式，理论与实践相结合，论述了法律适用的理论与实践问题，得出了目前国际商事仲裁在证据规则适用上的总体发展趋势。其次分析了我国的仲裁立法现状和实践，得出了我国仲裁立法有关规定不符合国际商事仲裁证据规则的发展趋势。并与我国民事诉讼中证据规则做比较，发现了我国涉外仲裁中运用的证据规则大多与国内诉讼相同，最后提出了我国涉外仲裁证据规则应该建立起特有的证据规则体系，在涉外商事仲裁中建构起公平、效率符合仲裁效益最大化的证明过程。 本文共分为四章，第一章采用了比较研究和文献分析等方法分析了国际商事仲裁的证据规则主要包括了证据能力、证明力和证明程序规则。基本原则中主要论述了意思自治和“谁主张谁举证”原则，并认为国际商事仲裁的价值取向是效率优先、兼顾公平，追求仲裁效益最大化。 第二章主要论述了国际商事仲裁中的法律适用问题，先分析了法律适用的理论，认为优先适用当事人选择的证据规则，若当事人没有选择，则适用仲裁地法，而“非当地化理论”并未得到普遍接受。然后采用实证分析法论述了我国、瑞典和美国的具体法律适用的实践，最后得出了国际商事仲裁证据规则法律适用的发展趋势。 第三章按照证据规则中的取证、质证和认证的顺序，具体阐述了取证中的域外取证和证据保全两个方面，质证中的交叉盘问规则和认证中几个具有代表性的证据规则以及仲裁员“自由心证”问题。 第四章首先分析了我国仲裁法中有关取证、质证和认证的相关规定的现状与不足，随后提出我国涉外仲裁域外取证的制度的构建、证据保全的完善、质证规则的简化、认证中对“自由心证”实行“心证公开”等建议，以期抛砖引玉。
[Abstract]:A lawsuit in an international civil action is evidence, and the same applies in international commercial arbitration. The rule of evidence is one of the important theoretical issues in international commercial arbitration. It also relates to whether the arbitral award meets the basic requirements of modern commercial arbitration such as fairness and efficiency. This paper begins with an introduction to the definition of evidence rules in the two legal systems, and puts forward the views of this paper on the connotation of evidence rules. Then, the paper focuses on the introduction of evidence rules, including the basic principles and value orientation. The rule of evidence is also concerned with the application of law. After the theoretical discussion, the author discusses the theory and practice of the application of law by using examples and combining theory with practice. The general development trend of the application of evidence rules in international commercial arbitration is obtained. Secondly, it analyzes the current situation and practice of arbitration legislation in China, and concludes that the relevant provisions of arbitration legislation in China are not in accordance with the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. Comparing with the evidence rules in civil litigation in our country, it is found that most of the evidence rules used in foreign arbitration in our country are the same as those in domestic litigation. Finally, it is put forward that the evidence rules of foreign arbitration in our country should set up a special system of evidence rules. In foreign-related commercial arbitration, the construction of fairness, efficiency in line with the maximum efficiency of arbitration proof process. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter analyzes the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration by means of comparative study and literature analysis, including the evidence capacity, the power of proof and the rules of proof procedure. In the basic principle, it mainly discusses the autonomy of will and the principle of "who advocates the proof", and points out that the value orientation of international commercial arbitration is efficiency first, fair consideration, and the pursuit of maximization of arbitration benefit. The second chapter mainly discusses the application of the law in international commercial arbitration, analyzes the theory of the application of the law, and thinks that the rules of evidence selected by the parties should be applied first, and if the parties do not choose, the law of the place of arbitration will be applied. However, the theory of non-localization has not been generally accepted. Then it discusses the practice of the application of the law in our country, Sweden and the United States by using the empirical analysis method, and finally draws the development trend of the application of the law to the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. In the third chapter, according to the order of evidence collection, cross-examination and authentication in the rules of evidence, two aspects of evidence taking and evidence preservation are elaborated in detail. Cross-examination rules in cross-examination, several representative evidence rules in certification and arbitrators'"free evidence". The fourth chapter first analyzes the current situation and deficiency of the relevant provisions on evidence, cross-examination and certification in the arbitration law of our country, then puts forward the construction of the system of extra-territorial evidence collection, the perfection of evidence preservation and the simplification of the rules of cross-examination in China's foreign arbitration. In the certification of "free heart card" to implement "heart card open" and other suggestions, with a view to drawing the brick.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4
本文编号：2144440
[Abstract]:A lawsuit in an international civil action is evidence, and the same applies in international commercial arbitration. The rule of evidence is one of the important theoretical issues in international commercial arbitration. It also relates to whether the arbitral award meets the basic requirements of modern commercial arbitration such as fairness and efficiency. This paper begins with an introduction to the definition of evidence rules in the two legal systems, and puts forward the views of this paper on the connotation of evidence rules. Then, the paper focuses on the introduction of evidence rules, including the basic principles and value orientation. The rule of evidence is also concerned with the application of law. After the theoretical discussion, the author discusses the theory and practice of the application of law by using examples and combining theory with practice. The general development trend of the application of evidence rules in international commercial arbitration is obtained. Secondly, it analyzes the current situation and practice of arbitration legislation in China, and concludes that the relevant provisions of arbitration legislation in China are not in accordance with the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. Comparing with the evidence rules in civil litigation in our country, it is found that most of the evidence rules used in foreign arbitration in our country are the same as those in domestic litigation. Finally, it is put forward that the evidence rules of foreign arbitration in our country should set up a special system of evidence rules. In foreign-related commercial arbitration, the construction of fairness, efficiency in line with the maximum efficiency of arbitration proof process. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter analyzes the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration by means of comparative study and literature analysis, including the evidence capacity, the power of proof and the rules of proof procedure. In the basic principle, it mainly discusses the autonomy of will and the principle of "who advocates the proof", and points out that the value orientation of international commercial arbitration is efficiency first, fair consideration, and the pursuit of maximization of arbitration benefit. The second chapter mainly discusses the application of the law in international commercial arbitration, analyzes the theory of the application of the law, and thinks that the rules of evidence selected by the parties should be applied first, and if the parties do not choose, the law of the place of arbitration will be applied. However, the theory of non-localization has not been generally accepted. Then it discusses the practice of the application of the law in our country, Sweden and the United States by using the empirical analysis method, and finally draws the development trend of the application of the law to the rules of evidence of international commercial arbitration. In the third chapter, according to the order of evidence collection, cross-examination and authentication in the rules of evidence, two aspects of evidence taking and evidence preservation are elaborated in detail. Cross-examination rules in cross-examination, several representative evidence rules in certification and arbitrators'"free evidence". The fourth chapter first analyzes the current situation and deficiency of the relevant provisions on evidence, cross-examination and certification in the arbitration law of our country, then puts forward the construction of the system of extra-territorial evidence collection, the perfection of evidence preservation and the simplification of the rules of cross-examination in China's foreign arbitration. In the certification of "free heart card" to implement "heart card open" and other suggestions, with a view to drawing the brick.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨娟;;试评近年来中国有关仲裁的主要司法解释[J];北京仲裁;2007年01期
2 费宗yN;;费宗yN先生谈仲裁法的修改[J];北京仲裁;2007年02期
3 梁慧星;;论仲裁法修改的方向——梁慧星先生在第二届中国仲裁论坛上的讲话[J];北京仲裁;2007年02期
4 李明;;最佳证据规则探索[J];研究生法学;2009年01期
5 尹伟民;;域外证据的特别证明程序探析——兼论《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第11条[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
6 卞建林,姚莉;关于建立和完善我国证据规则的思考[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1999年05期
7 刘晓红;;确定仲裁员责任制度的法理思考——兼评述中国仲裁员责任制度[J];华东政法大学学报;2007年05期
8 王长江;论我国裁判文书理由模式的选择[J];河南社会科学;2003年03期
9 宋朝武;;仲裁证据的非诉化及其路径选择[J];河南社会科学;2010年03期
10 郭道晖;立法的效益与效率[J];法学研究;1996年02期
本文编号：2144440
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2144440.html
