当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

国际刑事法院判决执行问题研究

发布时间:2018-07-30 06:31
【摘要】:2002年7月1日,作为人类社会第一个常设性的国际刑事审判机构——国际刑事法院在经过多国长期的讨论、争议与最终的妥协之下正式成立了。新成立的国际刑事法院被国际社会寄予厚望,联合国前秘书长科菲·安南曾说:“国际刑事法院的建立是对未来一代之希望的馈赠,并在通向普遍的人权与法制进程中迈出了巨大的一步。”事实上,国际刑事法院成立本身就具有重大意义,它是国际刑事法律发展史上里程碑式的事件。从筹备建立到正式成立到开始工作,对国际刑事法院相关问题的研究引起了世界各国政府和学者的高度关注,他们的研究涉及法院运作的多个方面。尽管如此,这些研究也主要是集中在法院管辖权问题部分。鉴于目前学者对管辖权等问题的研究已比较深入和全面,而对法院判决与相关裁决的执行问题研究较少,本文旨在对此问题进行初步的研究。《国际刑事法院罗马规约》第十编和《程序和证据规则》第十二章对判决的执行作了比较详细的规定,,本文将在此基础上研究分析。研究判决的执行问题也并不是只局限于有关执行的规定,而是结合《罗马规约》与《程序和证据规则》对法院的管辖权、刑罚、国际合作与司法协助等多方面的规定进行。本文通过对法院管辖权的简单介绍,对法院判决执行的内容即刑罚的执行进行体系化的分析,并对法院在执行中遭遇的困境及其原因以及有关的完善措施阐述了自己的观点。研究国际刑事法院判决执行的问题有助于发现和解决判决执行过程中遇到的实际问题,实现法院惩罚犯罪、保障人权的目的。 本文除了引言和结语以外主要由三部分组成。引言部分简单介绍了本文的选题背景与选题意义,文章所引用的主要文献的综述情况和本文的研究思路与研究方法。 第一部分是国际刑事法院的概述。在这部分里,首先介绍了设立国际刑事法院的历史背景,包括自一战以来设立的国际军事法庭和由联合国安理会设立的国际刑事法庭以及之后的一些特别法庭。现实是历史的重复,历史总是能对现实生活产生巨大的影响,了解历史有利于解决现实存在的问题,国际刑事问题当然也不例外。其次是对国际刑事法院的酝酿、诞生以及开始运作的详细阐述。本部分最后是对国际刑事法院的管辖权作了简单介绍。 文章的第二部分是本文的核心内容之一,主要是对国际刑事法院判决执行问题的深入研究。法院判决的执行主要表现为刑罚的执行,本文即是依此原理以《国际刑事法院罗马规约》和《程序和证据规则》的规定为基础,分析研究判决的执行问题,包括刑罚执行的目的,判决执行的主体、对象、时效,不同刑种的执行以及减刑制度等。 本文的第三部分是对国际刑事法院判决执行的现实情况、遭遇的问题、产生问题的原因的分析,并且提出一些笔者认为可行的加强国际刑事法院判决执行力措施的建议。但是,有关国际刑事法院执行问题的案例很少,相关理论研究也很少,与判决有关的几乎没有。因此,本文将在资料极为有限的基础上作出对国际刑事法院判决执行问题很有局限的研究。 结语部分则是对整篇文章内容的总结和对国际刑事法院判决执行问题在未来顺利解决与发展的展望。
[Abstract]:In July 1, 2002, the International Criminal Court, the first International Criminal Court of human society - the International Criminal Court (ICC) was formally established after a long period of discussion, dispute and final compromise. The newly established international criminal court was given great expectations by the international community. The former Secretary General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, said: "international criminal law." The establishment of the court is a gift to the hope of the future generation and a great step in the process of leading to universal human rights and the rule of law. "In fact, the establishment of the International Criminal Court itself is of great significance. It is a milestone in the history of the development of international criminal law. The research on the issues related to the Criminal Court has aroused the high attention of governments and scholars all over the world. Their research involves many aspects of the operation of the court. However, these studies are mainly focused on the jurisdiction of the court. In view of the current scholars' research on the jurisdiction and other issues is more thorough and comprehensive, and the court is judged by the court. There are few studies on the implementation of the related adjudication. This article is intended to make a preliminary study on this issue. The tenth edition of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court and the twelfth chapter of the rules of procedure and evidence have made a more detailed provision on the execution of the decision. This article will be based on this study. The question of the execution of the judgment is not a single Bureau. It is limited to the provisions relating to implementation, but in combination with the provisions of the Rome statute and the rules of procedure and evidence on the jurisdiction of the court, the penalty, the international cooperation and judicial assistance. This article, through a simple introduction to the jurisdiction of the court, systematically analyses the execution of the court's judgment, namely the execution of the penalty penalty, and to the court The problems encountered in the implementation and its reasons as well as the relevant measures are expounded. The study of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court will help to find and solve the practical problems encountered in the execution of the judgment, and to realize the purpose of the court to punish the crime and protect the human rights.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper mainly consists of three parts. The introduction briefly introduces the background and significance of the topic, the summary of the main literature cited in the article and the research ideas and research methods of this article.
The first part is the overview of the International Criminal Court. In this section, it first introduces the historical background of the establishment of the International Criminal Court, including the international military tribunals established since the first World War and the international criminal tribunals established by the United Nations Security Council, as well as some special courts after the United Nations Security Council. There is a great influence on life, the understanding of history is conducive to the solution of the existing problems, and the international criminal problem is certainly no exception. The second is a detailed exposition of the brew, birth and operation of the International Criminal Court. This part is the final introduction to the jurisdiction of the international criminal court.
The second part of the article is one of the core contents of this article, which is mainly the study of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court. The execution of the court's judgment is mainly embodied in the execution of the penalty. This article is based on the principles of the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court and the regulations of the procedure and the rules of evidence. The problems include the purpose of penalty execution, the subject of judgment execution, object, prescription, execution of different kinds of punishment and commutation system.
The third part of this article is the analysis of the actual situation of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court, the problems encountered, the cause of the problem, and some suggestions that the author thinks feasible to strengthen the enforcement of the International Criminal Court. However, there are few cases about the implementation of the International Criminal Court, and the relevant theoretical research is also very important. Few, little related to the verdict. Therefore, this article will make a very limited study on the question of the enforcement of the International Criminal Court on the basis of very limited information.
The conclusion part is the summary of the whole article and the prospect of the successful implementation and settlement of the International Criminal Court decision.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D997.9

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前9条

1 黄风;国际刑事司法协助中的被判刑人移管[J];比较法研究;1990年04期

2 李雪平;《罗马规约》与国际刑事法院面临的法律问题[J];法学评论;2002年06期

3 陆蓉;;国际刑事法院审判执行的法律问题分析[J];广西广播电视大学学报;2010年01期

4 吴晓丹;;国际司法机构判决的执行监督机制[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年05期

5 罗国强;;国际刑事法院的管辖权与执行权问题——评苏丹总统逮捕令事件[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期

6 Pierre-Gilles Belanger,赵秉志,王秀梅;国际刑事法院的批准与执行——《国际刑事法院规约》中规定的执行义务:加拿大的实践[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2002年03期

7 杨力军;《国际刑事法院罗马规约》浅析[J];环球法律评论;2003年02期

8 龙宗智;国际刑事法院检察官的地位与功能研究[J];现代法学;2003年03期

9 朱文奇;国际刑事法院的成立和国际刑法的发展[J];政治与法律;2003年01期



本文编号:2154119

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2154119.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4345b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com