论我国国际私法对弱者权益之保护
[Abstract]:In order to solve these legal disputes fairly, we must protect the disadvantaged parties, that is, the weak, which is also in line with the mainstream value orientation of private international law. To study the protection of the rights and interests of the weak in private international law, we should first introduce the protection of the rights and interests of the weak, discuss its historical evolution process, and study the whole development history of the trend that will become the basic principle from its germination to its establishment to the present, mainly using historical analysis methods to analyze the legislative and judicial practice of various periods. The point lies in expounding the theoretical basis of its existence, that is, the necessity, and the significance of its existence. In this part, case analysis method is used to combine case with theory to make the article more convincing. At the basic system level of private international law legislation, the author mainly studies the relationship between the most closely related principles of private international law, such as the reservation of public order and the protection of the rights and interests of the weak and their impact on the protection of the rights and interests of the weak. The principle of the closest relationship embodies the principle of the protection of the rights and interests of the weak to a certain extent, while the principle of the protection of the rights and interests of the weak has perfected the principle of the closest, the two are not opposed, but complementary to each other; Principles have different forms in the legislation of the international community, and different forms have different degrees and methods of protection of the rights and interests of the weak; the application of mandatory provisions makes the protection of the rights and interests of the weak in private international law has been effectively increased, making the protection of the rights and interests of the weak more diversified means of adjustment, but also makes this kind of protection. The protection is more direct and powerful; the reservation of public order system also plays a role in the protection of the rights and interests of the weak in judicial practice, although it was not taken into account when it was established, because of its particularity, it should pay attention to the relevant issues in the application so as to better implement the protection of the rights and interests of the weak, in line with the development trend of private international law. However, the enactment of the Law of Application of Law is a milestone in China's private international law, but we should also realize that there are some defects, such as the vague criteria for the determination of the weak and the narrow scope, the slight lack of effective methods for the protection of the rights and interests of the weak, the inadequacy of provisions on the reservation of public order, and the provisions on the level of specific conflict rules. Thirdly, on the basis of defining the shortcomings of China's relevant systems, the author makes a referential analysis of the protection of the rights and interests of the weak in private international law in the international community, and learns its advanced points. The weak in private international law provide more powerful protection; the follow-up law of public order reservation can be used as one of the alternatives, considering the protection given to the weak. In the specific conflict rules, foreign-related consumer contracts, foreign-related labor contracts, product liability, marriage and family and other fields are also worth our country's private international law. Finally, through the study of international treaties and foreign legislations, using the method of induction and summary, combined with China's national conditions, put forward rationalization proposals for the protection of the rights and interests of the weak in China's private international law, including not only defining the standards of the weak and expanding the scope of the weak, the law in favor of the weak as a family formula, the protection of the rights and interests of the weak will be upgraded to the protection of the rights and interests of the weak The basic principles, the increase of the connecting points of law application after the reservation of public order, and the amendment of the applicable rules of specific provisions.
【学位授予单位】:北京交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D997
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈渊鑫;论我国公共秩序保留制度[J];兰州学刊;2003年02期
2 洪亦卿;国际惯例适用中应否援用公共秩序保留——我国相关规定之应然剖析[J];台声.新视角;2005年03期
3 靳婷;;对民法典中公共秩序保留条款的立法思考[J];石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年04期
4 李颖;;承认与执行外国法院判决中的公共秩序保留[J];当代经理人;2006年10期
5 楚风华;;论中国公共秩序保留制度及其完善[J];社科纵横;2006年07期
6 郑海湛;;公共秩序保留制度及其在我国的立法和完善[J];科技成果纵横;2006年05期
7 夏雨;;论公共秩序保留制度发展的新态势[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2007年03期
8 隽薪;;论公共秩序保留制度的限制适用趋势[J];法制与社会;2008年14期
9 张晓婷;;从公共秩序保留制度简论国际公共秩序与国内公共秩序之区分——兼谈相关公共秩序保留制度立法建议[J];法制与社会;2008年23期
10 段威;;再议我国公共秩序保留制度的不足和改进[J];法制与社会;2010年25期
相关重要报纸文章 前6条
1 汕头市金平区人民法院 余庆;完善我国区际民事法律冲突中公共秩序保留制度的若干建议[N];汕头日报;2012年
2 沈涓;公共秩序保留制度的弹性[N];财经时报;2004年
3 贵州大学03级法律一系 王婷;论区际冲突法上的公共秩序保留制度[N];经济信息时报;2007年
4 李志轩;境内外旅行社接待合同亟待规范[N];中国旅游报;2006年
5 夏婷婷;仲裁裁决承认与执行中公共秩序保留的适用[N];人民法院报;2004年
6 王胜东;CEPA下内地与香港间商事判决的承认与执行[N];人民法院报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王雪冬;论我国的公共秩序保留制度[D];中国政法大学;2007年
2 秦慧娟;论公共秩序保留制度[D];郑州大学;2009年
3 杨柳;国际私法中的公共秩序保留[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2015年
4 杨v,
本文编号:2186875
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2186875.html