国际法院迟延同意管辖权研究
发布时间：2018-08-22 08:10
【摘要】：冷战结束后，两极格局不复存在，全球化、多极化趋势日益加强，国际社会逐步进入全球治理与国际法治时代。从上个世纪八十年代中期开始，国际法院逐渐复兴，审理案件逐年增多，工作效率也有所提高，国际社会对此普遍报以欢迎态度。国际社会是一个平权社会，不存在任何超越国家之上的中央权威机关。与之相适应的是，国际法院也不具备类似于国内法院的强制管辖权，其管辖权的行使必须基于国家的同意。无论从国际法院的既往判例，还是从各国所持的现实态度来看，国际社会中有较多国家对国际法院信任不足，始终徘徊于国际法院的大门之外。为了实现国际法治和维护国际秩序的和平，国际法院想方设法地在国家同意原则的基础之上开辟新的管辖途径。鼓励各国通过迟延同意管辖权将争端提交国际法院裁决便是其中的一项重大举措。就在本世纪初，迟延同意管辖权得到了两次典型的适用，取得了较好的效果并得到国际法院和有关方面的积极肯定与认可。因此，对该管辖权的研究兼具理论和现实意义。 除绪论和结论外，论文共分五章。第一章首先对迟延同意管辖权做了比较明确的界定，接着对该管辖权的法律特征、历史发展和法律依据等内容做了必要的论述。第二章从被告国、原告国和国际法院三个角度出发，集中探讨了迟延同意管辖权的三大运行原则——同意原则、善意原则和管辖权的管辖权原则，力图澄清若干相关争议问题。第三章主要涉及与迟延同意管辖权相关的附带程序。本章通过对相关理论和司法实践的分析，，逐步厘清其与各附带程序相互间的关系以及在适用时需要注意的问题。第四章是对迟延同意管辖权相关案件的法律剖析，既有常设国际法院时期的案件概述，也有最新典型案件的详尽分析，力图做到详略得当，重点突出。第五章回顾了中国与国际法院关系的历史与现状，并对中国不接受国际法院管辖的原因进行了深入探讨。在此基础之上，本文得出结论认为，积极利用迟延同意管辖权的优越性，根据具体情况有选择地将重要性为中等程度的案件提交国际法院的做法，不失为我国利用国际法院的一个潜在突破口。同时，这也是维护我国国家利益、顺应国际法治进程的理性选择。
[Abstract]:Since the end of the cold war, the bipolar pattern has ceased to exist, the trend of globalization and multipolarization has strengthened, and the international community has gradually entered the era of global governance and international rule of law. The international community is a society of equal rights, and there is no central authority beyond the state. Accordingly, the International Court of Justice does not have compulsory jurisdiction similar to that of domestic courts, and the exercise of its jurisdiction must be based on the consent of the state. In order to realize the international rule of law and maintain the peace of international order, the International Court of Justice has tried every means to open up new jurisdictional channels on the basis of the principle of consent by States. It encourages States to delay consent to jurisdiction to settle disputes. Referring to the International Court of Justice is one of the important measures. At the beginning of this century, the deferred consent jurisdiction has been applied twice, and achieved good results, and has been positively affirmed and recognized by the International Court of Justice and related parties. Therefore, the study of this jurisdiction has both theoretical and practical significance.
The first chapter defines the jurisdiction of deferred consent clearly, and then discusses the legal characteristics, historical development and legal basis of the jurisdiction. The second chapter focuses on the defence, plaintiff and the International Court of justice. The third chapter mainly deals with the incidental procedure related to the jurisdiction of delayed consent. Through the analysis of relevant theories and judicial practice, this chapter gradually clarifies the relationship between the principle of consent, the principle of good faith and the principle of jurisdiction of jurisdiction. Chapter Four is the legal analysis of the cases related to the deferred consent jurisdiction, including the summary of the cases in the period of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the detailed analysis of the latest typical cases. It tries to be detailed and appropriate, with emphasis. Chapter Five reviews the history and current situation of the relationship between China and the International Court of Justice, and also makes a detailed analysis of the latest typical cases. On this basis, the article concludes that it is a potential breakthrough for China to actively utilize the superiority of delayed consent jurisdiction and selectively refer cases of intermediate importance to the International Court of Justice according to specific circumstances. At the same time, it is also a rational choice to safeguard our national interests and conform to the international rule of law.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D997.9
本文编号：2196509
[Abstract]:Since the end of the cold war, the bipolar pattern has ceased to exist, the trend of globalization and multipolarization has strengthened, and the international community has gradually entered the era of global governance and international rule of law. The international community is a society of equal rights, and there is no central authority beyond the state. Accordingly, the International Court of Justice does not have compulsory jurisdiction similar to that of domestic courts, and the exercise of its jurisdiction must be based on the consent of the state. In order to realize the international rule of law and maintain the peace of international order, the International Court of Justice has tried every means to open up new jurisdictional channels on the basis of the principle of consent by States. It encourages States to delay consent to jurisdiction to settle disputes. Referring to the International Court of Justice is one of the important measures. At the beginning of this century, the deferred consent jurisdiction has been applied twice, and achieved good results, and has been positively affirmed and recognized by the International Court of Justice and related parties. Therefore, the study of this jurisdiction has both theoretical and practical significance.
The first chapter defines the jurisdiction of deferred consent clearly, and then discusses the legal characteristics, historical development and legal basis of the jurisdiction. The second chapter focuses on the defence, plaintiff and the International Court of justice. The third chapter mainly deals with the incidental procedure related to the jurisdiction of delayed consent. Through the analysis of relevant theories and judicial practice, this chapter gradually clarifies the relationship between the principle of consent, the principle of good faith and the principle of jurisdiction of jurisdiction. Chapter Four is the legal analysis of the cases related to the deferred consent jurisdiction, including the summary of the cases in the period of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the detailed analysis of the latest typical cases. It tries to be detailed and appropriate, with emphasis. Chapter Five reviews the history and current situation of the relationship between China and the International Court of Justice, and also makes a detailed analysis of the latest typical cases. On this basis, the article concludes that it is a potential breakthrough for China to actively utilize the superiority of delayed consent jurisdiction and selectively refer cases of intermediate importance to the International Court of Justice according to specific circumstances. At the same time, it is also a rational choice to safeguard our national interests and conform to the international rule of law.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D997.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许楚旭;;国际法院诉讼案件判决的执行问题探析[J];北方法学;2009年05期
2 姜琪;简论国际法上的管辖权制度[J];当代法学;2001年05期
3 赵海峰;;论国际司法程序的发展及其对国际法的影响[J];当代法学;2011年01期
4 宋杰;;国际法院司法实践中的反诉问题研究[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2006年03期
5 徐杰;联合国国际法院作用之辨析[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1996年03期
6 钟继军;;政府间组织成为国际法院诉讼当事者之辨析[J];法学杂志;2008年05期
7 林泰;陈红;;非政府组织与联合国、国际法院关系比较析论[J];法学杂志;2009年09期
8 赵海峰;;中国与国际司法机构关系的演进[J];法学评论;2008年06期
9 苏晓宏;国际司法对国际关系转型的影响[J];法学;2005年04期
10 何志鹏;;国际社会的法治路径[J];法治研究;2010年11期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 张卫彬;国际法院解决领土争端中的证据问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
2 黄建中;国际法庭管辖权研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
本文编号：2196509
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2196509.html
