欧盟针对中国反倾销调查相关问题研究
发布时间:2018-08-25 07:43
【摘要】:加入世界贸易组织,不仅给中国带来了许多机遇同时也带来了更多挑战。在全球经济都呈现发展放缓甚至衰退的今天,中国的对外贸易总量及经济总量却保持着高速稳定的发展。欧盟作为世界上最大的经济体,是目前中国最大的贸易合作伙伴。与此同时,欧盟是世界上对中国发起反倾销调查最多的地区。大量的反倾销调查不仅损害了中国出口企业的经济利益,也对整个中国出口产业造成了严重影响。由于欧盟经济的持续衰退,欧盟的贸易保护倾向越来越严重,这意味着针对中国发起的反倾销调查将会越来越多。中国目前还处在应对反倾销调查的初期阶段,中国政府与企业都缺乏相关经验和相关法律人才。因此,深入了解欧盟的反倾销法规并找准应对的方法是首要任务。 本文通过对大量的反倾销案例进行分析,深入发掘了欧盟在认定中国企业存在倾销时的重要依据与原则。在此基础上,笔者发现中国的“非市场经济地位”是中国与欧盟在面对反倾销调查时最大的分歧点。本文首先通过运用经济学的数据分析方法如规范分析法与实证分析法,结合横向分析与纵向分析对近几年中欧之间的贸易数据及反倾销调查数据进行分类与比较,发现欧盟针对中国发起的反倾销调查存在快速增长、肯定性终裁率高及涉案产品范围广、特定产品数量大的特点。同时发现中国企业难以在倾销认定时获得欧盟认可的“市场经济地位”。面对这样的特点,笔者通过具体案例对欧盟的《反倾销条例》中关于“市场经济地位”认定的五条标准进行了深入的剖析。其次,笔者对中国的市场经济地位进行了全方位的肯定性论证。最后,针对“非市场经济地位”这一争议点笔者分别给出了针对中国政府及企业的对策。
[Abstract]:China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) has not only brought China many opportunities, but also brought more challenges. Today, when the global economy is slowing down or even declining, China's foreign trade volume and total economic volume maintain a rapid and stable development. As the world's largest economy, the EU is currently China's largest trading partner. At the same time, the European Union is the world's largest anti-dumping investigation against China. A large number of anti-dumping investigations not only hurt the economic interests of China's export enterprises, but also have a serious impact on the entire Chinese export industry. As the European Union's economy continues to decline, the EU's tendency to protect trade is growing, which means more anti-dumping investigations will be launched against China. China is still in the early stage of dealing with anti-dumping investigations, and the Chinese government and enterprises lack relevant experience and relevant legal personnel. Therefore, the most important task is to understand EU anti-dumping regulations and to find out how to deal with them. Based on the analysis of a large number of anti-dumping cases, this paper explores the important basis and principles of the EU in determining the existence of dumping in Chinese enterprises. On this basis, the author finds that China's "non-market economy status" is the biggest divergence point between China and EU in the face of anti-dumping investigation. Firstly, this paper classifies and compares the trade data and anti-dumping investigation data between China and Europe in recent years by using economic data analysis methods such as normative analysis and empirical analysis, combining horizontal analysis and longitudinal analysis. It is found that the anti-dumping investigation initiated by the European Union against China has the characteristics of rapid growth, high positive final arbitration rate, wide range of products involved, and large quantity of specific products. At the same time, it is difficult for Chinese enterprises to obtain the "market economy status" recognized by the European Union when the dumping is confirmed. In the face of such characteristics, the author makes a thorough analysis of the five standards concerning the recognition of "market economy status" in the EU's Anti-dumping regulations through specific cases. Second, the author of the market economy status of China has all-round positive argument. Finally, aiming at the dispute of "non-market economy status", the author puts forward the countermeasures for Chinese government and enterprises respectively.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.1;F752.02
本文编号:2202223
[Abstract]:China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) has not only brought China many opportunities, but also brought more challenges. Today, when the global economy is slowing down or even declining, China's foreign trade volume and total economic volume maintain a rapid and stable development. As the world's largest economy, the EU is currently China's largest trading partner. At the same time, the European Union is the world's largest anti-dumping investigation against China. A large number of anti-dumping investigations not only hurt the economic interests of China's export enterprises, but also have a serious impact on the entire Chinese export industry. As the European Union's economy continues to decline, the EU's tendency to protect trade is growing, which means more anti-dumping investigations will be launched against China. China is still in the early stage of dealing with anti-dumping investigations, and the Chinese government and enterprises lack relevant experience and relevant legal personnel. Therefore, the most important task is to understand EU anti-dumping regulations and to find out how to deal with them. Based on the analysis of a large number of anti-dumping cases, this paper explores the important basis and principles of the EU in determining the existence of dumping in Chinese enterprises. On this basis, the author finds that China's "non-market economy status" is the biggest divergence point between China and EU in the face of anti-dumping investigation. Firstly, this paper classifies and compares the trade data and anti-dumping investigation data between China and Europe in recent years by using economic data analysis methods such as normative analysis and empirical analysis, combining horizontal analysis and longitudinal analysis. It is found that the anti-dumping investigation initiated by the European Union against China has the characteristics of rapid growth, high positive final arbitration rate, wide range of products involved, and large quantity of specific products. At the same time, it is difficult for Chinese enterprises to obtain the "market economy status" recognized by the European Union when the dumping is confirmed. In the face of such characteristics, the author makes a thorough analysis of the five standards concerning the recognition of "market economy status" in the EU's Anti-dumping regulations through specific cases. Second, the author of the market economy status of China has all-round positive argument. Finally, aiming at the dispute of "non-market economy status", the author puts forward the countermeasures for Chinese government and enterprises respectively.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.1;F752.02
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张文科,刘晓洁;非市场经济国家地位与对华反倾销[J];边疆经济与文化;2005年02期
2 王胜伟;;反倾销非市场经济国家问题研究[J];江苏技术师范学院学报;2010年01期
3 陈明聪;我国应对因非市场经济地位问题被反倾销的对策[J];东南学术;2003年04期
4 俞姣红;;我国出口贸易风险的会计应对措施[J];北方经贸;2007年07期
5 高鹏程;;论两反调查程序共存时倾销幅度确定过程中的价格调整——WTO规则和美国的实践[J];国际经济法学刊;2008年04期
6 高维新;;欧盟对华反倾销的经济影响及对策分析[J];国际经济合作;2010年05期
7 张芳 ,邹俊;中国“非市场经济地位”问题研究[J];技术经济;2005年05期
8 吴总建;张小南;;我国出口产品遭受国外歧视性反倾销的原因及应对策略[J];理论与改革;2006年06期
9 王美莹;李雪;;试论中国的“非市场经济地位”与对华反倾销[J];内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
10 李金玲;李晓燕;;“非市场经济地位”相关问题的理论分析[J];前沿;2006年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 方曙光;[N];财经时报;2006年
2 外经贸大学教授、中国WTO研究会副会长 薛荣久;[N];中国贸易报;2004年
,本文编号:2202223
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2202223.html