太平岛法律争议及其解决路径探索
[Abstract]:The full text includes introduction, three main parts, conclusion, a total of more than 21000 characters. Introduction Since the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea does not specify the criteria for the division of islands and reefs, there are many disputes in the international academic circles on the division of islands and reefs, so the rules of interpretation of the Convention are taken into account. It is of great significance to study the legal dispute of Taiping Island in China in order to prove its legal status. I. Overview of legal disputes in Taiping Island. Taiping Island has superior natural geographical advantage and high strategic value in the South China Sea region, so it has become a necessary place for military experts and has been changed hands seven times in history. In January 2013, the Philippines formally launched a mandatory arbitration case against China over the South China Sea, sparking a dispute over the legal status of Taiping Island. Second, comments on the legal dispute over Taiping Island. In January 2013, the Philippines initiated a case of compulsory arbitration of China on the South China Sea, which involves the determination of the legal status of Taiping Island and whether it can claim an economic exclusive zone. Issues related to marine rights and interests such as the continental shelf. In view of the legal dispute between China and Philippines, the focus is on how to characterize Article 121 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Third, Taiping Island legal dispute settlement path. In view of the fact that there are neither clear international norms to refer to nor unified international judicial jurisprudence and State practice to draw lessons from, the author tries to improve the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by advancing the Convention on the Law of the Sea. Some suggestions are put forward to resolve the dispute of islands and reefs in Taiping Island of China and Philippines from the perspective of reasonable explanation and other flexible comprehensive measures. Conclusion As for the problem of defining islands and reefs, it is the most important problem to be solved in maritime boundary disputes. In view of the legal dispute between China and Philippines Taiping Island, the article mainly discusses the natural geography of Taiping Island, the status quo and evolution of ownership, the background of the dispute, the analysis of the dispute and the exploration of the settlement path, etc. He also expressed his own opinion on the legal status of Taiping Island.
【学位授予单位】:海南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D993.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 江淮;;太平岛——见证南海百年沧桑[J];世界知识;2009年07期
2 陈明;中国南海太平岛掠影[J];江海侨声;1996年02期
3 桑海;;台军弃守太平岛[J];海洋世界;2000年02期
4 豫夫;;台军决意要在太平岛修建机场[J];当代海军;2006年03期
5 雨田;;太平岛:两岸联手抗敌的前沿阵地[J];中国边防警察;2011年04期
6 盛荣 ,章强;今日太平岛[J];水兵;1994年04期
7 豫夫;;建南海军事基地,图谋扩大战略纵深 风云太平岛——台军重新进驻太平岛内幕[J];国际展望;2006年07期
8 一木;国民党海军缘何撤离太平岛[J];当代海军;2000年02期
9 马骏杰;;1956年,台军三登太平岛[J];环球军事;2010年19期
10 ;外交部发言人关于南沙群岛主权问题的声明[J];中华人民共和国国务院公报;1956年21期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 巫文隆;;台湾贝类多样性研究[A];中国动物学会、中国海洋湖沼学会贝类学分会第八次会员代表大会暨第十三次全国贝类学术讨论会论文摘要集[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 李劲松;解密海上要塞太平岛[N];中国国防报;2008年
2 薛理泰;港媒:越南若在南海动武,将首取太平岛[N];国防时报;2010年
3 江天;担心太平岛失守,,台民间希望两岸共护南海[N];国防时报;2010年
4 本报特约撰稿 梅锋;台湾大陆共守太平岛?[N];中国国防报;2011年
5 梅锋;两岸协防保太平岛太平[N];国防时报;2011年
6 本报特约记者 王大可;台当局提升太平岛驻军战力[N];人民日报海外版;2011年
7 王进 董伟;太平岛可作两岸合作基地[N];国防时报;2011年
8 本报特约记者 王大可;越舰挑衅南沙太平岛[N];人民日报海外版;2012年
9 姜廉海;越南武装船只逼近南沙太平岛[N];中国国防报;2012年
10 小婉;台“立委”南沙太平岛“劳军”[N];团结报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 仪媛媛;太平岛法律争议及其解决路径探索[D];海南大学;2017年
本文编号:2202519
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2202519.html