中国政策性贷款的WTO合规性研究
[Abstract]:Since Canada first applied countervailing investigation to products originating in China in 2004, WTO members have gradually applied countervailing law to China. In a growing number of U.S. and Canadian countervailing investigations into products originating in China, the United States and Canada accused Chinese policy banks and state-owned commercial banks of providing policy-oriented loans to specific companies. In both U.S. and Canadian countervailing investigations into products originating in China, more than half of the cases involved investigations into preferential loans to specific enterprises by Chinese policy banks and state-owned commercial banks. In their view, since China's policy banks and state-owned commercial banks are effectively controlled by the government, these policy loans constitute financial assistance provided by the Chinese government and have a special orientation. As a result, many "policy loan projects" have been recognized as constituting subsidies. Therefore, whether the loans provided by Chinese policy banks and state-owned commercial banks to specific enterprises constitute policy loans prohibited by WTO subsidies and countervailing rules are worth exploring. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter systematically introduces the connotation of policy loan, analyzes the meaning of "policy" in policy loan, its forms of expression and the relationship between policy loan and loan. It is also pointed out that "policy" must be a binding document for the main body of the loan, and there must be a direct causal relationship between the "policy" and the loan, otherwise, a loan cannot be categorically regarded as a policy loan. Then, through the study of the types of policy loans in major countries and China, the author finds that there are a large number of policy loans issued to specific industries or enterprises through policy banks and state-owned commercial banks at present in China. The second chapter analyzes the current situation of countervailing investigation of China's policy loans by WTO members through the investigation of the United States and Canada on China's policy loans. The third chapter studies the discipline of WTO countervailing rules and discusses what kind of loans are prohibited by WTO subsidy and countervailing rules. Through the analysis of the constituent elements of subsidy in the SCM agreement and the demonstration of the WTO compliance of the United States and China to the Chinese policy loan in the "double countervailing case", this paper probes into the main body of the Chinese policy loan in the loan supply. The exclusivity and the conferral of benefits accord with the constitution of actionable subsidy under SCM agreement. The fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the WTO compliance challenges faced by policy loans, and points out that on the one hand, China should fundamentally change its thinking, reduce the use of policy loans, and improve the relevant legislation at the legislative level. Standardize industrial policy, on the other hand, should adjust the train of thought to respond to suit, deal with countervailing investigation actively.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D996.1;D922.28;F832.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 管守安,张宇润;政策性贷款法律制度探析[J];安徽大学学报;1999年06期
2 黄文旭;;加拿大反补贴法律制度初探[J];大经贸;2007年12期
3 李仲平;李炼;;“美国对华铜版纸案”述评——基于反补贴申诉的考察[J];法商研究;2008年01期
4 张乃根;;论WTO争端解决的国内法审查[J];法学家;2008年03期
5 黄青燕;姜发根;;我国面临的反补贴形势及对策分析[J];改革与战略;2009年10期
6 龚柏华;倪洁颖;;中美有关铜版纸征收反倾销和反补贴税WTO磋商案评析[J];国际商务研究;2007年06期
7 王弈通;;论补贴专向性的标准与评判——兼议专向性标准在美国对华反补贴调查案中的适用[J];国际商务研究;2009年01期
8 孙南申;彭岳;;中国补贴现状与面临反补贴措施的法律应对[J];河北法学;2007年06期
9 彭毛字;专项贷款与政策性贷款的异同[J];经济问题;1998年12期
10 陈利强;;美国反补贴税法之事实专向性标准探究[J];商场现代化;2008年13期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 郭新双;国外政策性金融机构研究[D];吉林大学;2005年
2 毛骁骁;WTO框架下的中国国企补贴法律问题研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 吕莹;论SCM协议中的补贴构成与认定[D];中南大学;2005年
2 邓广磊;论WTO《SCM协定》下补贴的认定[D];华东政法大学;2007年
3 张琼芳;WTO框架下欧盟、美国补贴与反补贴规则之比较[D];湖南师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:2210714
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2210714.html