航空产品责任案件管辖权的确定:美国实践及其启示
发布时间：2018-09-07 14:23
【摘要】：航空产品责任是美国乃至全球航空事故索赔诉讼的一个难题。该类案件具有显著的国际性特征,因此决定了其国际管辖权的分配。美国法院在航空产品责任领域适用属人管辖理论,基于当事人和国家利益,针对四类产品责任案件,积极利用持续"业务活动"联系因素、"代理机构"理论、"商业流通"标准、"公平正义"传统观念,抑制适用不方便法院原则,灵活调控案件,使其回归本国管辖。中国制造的C919大飞机不久将进入国际市场,为防范航空产品责任诉讼泛滥和防止与中国有关的案件流向他国法院,中国司法实践可借鉴美国经验,对域外发生的航空产品责任案件,谨慎适用不方便法院原则,将其视为一种例外规则,适度扩张管辖权,做到"管""拒"自如,以保护航空器制造商和国家的核心权益。
[Abstract]:Aviation product liability is a difficult problem in American and even global aviation accident claim litigation. This kind of case has the remarkable international characteristic, therefore determines its international jurisdiction assignment. American courts apply the theory of personal jurisdiction in the field of aviation product liability. Based on the interests of the parties and the state, American courts apply to four types of product liability cases. Active use of continuous "business activities" contact factors, "agency" theory, "commercial circulation" standard, "fair and just" traditional concept, restrain the application of inconvenient court principle, flexible regulation and control of cases, so that they return to domestic jurisdiction. The C919 aircraft made in China will soon enter the international market. In order to prevent the proliferation of aviation product liability litigation and prevent the flow of China-related cases to the courts of other countries, China's judicial practice can draw lessons from the experience of the United States. In order to protect the core rights and interests of the aircraft manufacturer and the state, the principle of inconvenient court should be applied prudently in the case of aviation product liability outside the territory, which should be regarded as an exceptional rule, expand jurisdiction moderately and "refuse" freely.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学凯原法学院;
【基金】：2016年中国博士后科学基金第60批面上资助项目“中国大飞机发展背景下民用航空器适航责任研究”(2016M601570) 2017年中国博士后科学基金第10批特别资助项目“中国大飞机发展战略法律保障机制研究”(2017T100292) 西北政法大学“一带一路”重大国际法问题研究青年学术创新团队科研项目
【分类号】：D993.4
，
本文编号：2228518
[Abstract]:Aviation product liability is a difficult problem in American and even global aviation accident claim litigation. This kind of case has the remarkable international characteristic, therefore determines its international jurisdiction assignment. American courts apply the theory of personal jurisdiction in the field of aviation product liability. Based on the interests of the parties and the state, American courts apply to four types of product liability cases. Active use of continuous "business activities" contact factors, "agency" theory, "commercial circulation" standard, "fair and just" traditional concept, restrain the application of inconvenient court principle, flexible regulation and control of cases, so that they return to domestic jurisdiction. The C919 aircraft made in China will soon enter the international market. In order to prevent the proliferation of aviation product liability litigation and prevent the flow of China-related cases to the courts of other countries, China's judicial practice can draw lessons from the experience of the United States. In order to protect the core rights and interests of the aircraft manufacturer and the state, the principle of inconvenient court should be applied prudently in the case of aviation product liability outside the territory, which should be regarded as an exceptional rule, expand jurisdiction moderately and "refuse" freely.
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学凯原法学院;
【基金】：2016年中国博士后科学基金第60批面上资助项目“中国大飞机发展背景下民用航空器适航责任研究”(2016M601570) 2017年中国博士后科学基金第10批特别资助项目“中国大飞机发展战略法律保障机制研究”(2017T100292) 西北政法大学“一带一路”重大国际法问题研究青年学术创新团队科研项目
【分类号】：D993.4
，
本文编号：2228518
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2228518.html
