后代人权利理论批判
发布时间：2018-09-09 11:13
【摘要】：当今世界环境学科领域存在着具有广泛影响的"后代人权利"理论。但后代人权利论者用以支持后代人权利的各种证据都无法在逻辑上必然推出后代人享有权利的结论。后代人权利理论赖以成立的预设性前提也是虚构的客观事实。虽然近代以来,传统权利的主体范围确实有所扩展,但这种扩展并非是随意的。权利不可能扩展到后代人权利论者所说的"后代人"身上。环境义务是后代人权利理论的本质,也是后代人权利理论的正确出路和归宿。
[Abstract]:In the field of environmental science in the world today, there is a theory of "the rights of future generations" which has extensive influence. However, all kinds of evidences used by descendant rights theorists to support the rights of future generations cannot logically infer the conclusion that the later generations have rights. The presupposition premise on which the theory of human rights is established is also a fictional objective fact. Although the scope of the subject of traditional rights has been expanded since modern times, this expansion is not random. Rights cannot be extended to future generations, as the rights theorists call them. Environmental obligation is the essence of the theory of human rights of future generations, and the correct way and destination of the theory of human rights of future generations.
【作者单位】： 清华大学法学院环境资源与能源法研究中心;
【分类号】：D911;D996.9
[Abstract]:In the field of environmental science in the world today, there is a theory of "the rights of future generations" which has extensive influence. However, all kinds of evidences used by descendant rights theorists to support the rights of future generations cannot logically infer the conclusion that the later generations have rights. The presupposition premise on which the theory of human rights is established is also a fictional objective fact. Although the scope of the subject of traditional rights has been expanded since modern times, this expansion is not random. Rights cannot be extended to future generations, as the rights theorists call them. Environmental obligation is the essence of the theory of human rights of future generations, and the correct way and destination of the theory of human rights of future generations.
【作者单位】： 清华大学法学院环境资源与能源法研究中心;
【分类号】：D911;D996.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 陈泉生;环境时代与宪法环境权的创设[J];福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年04期
2 吕忠梅;论公民环境权[J];法学研究;1995年06期
3 陈冬;美国环境公民诉讼的理论基础之探析[J];郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年06期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘雪斌;代际正义研究[D];吉林大学;2006年
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 唐建生;关于可持续发展观的伦理思考[J];安徽教育学院学报;2003年03期
2 莫湘益;论附带民事赔偿范围的扩张[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2003年03期
3 李青武,刘锐;法律视角中的公司信用[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期
4 张，
本文编号：2232213
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2232213.html
