中国对欧美进口耐磨纸产品反倾销案例分析
发布时间:2018-09-17 09:55
【摘要】:改革开放以来,由于我国的非市场经济地位及其对外贸易的快速增长,一直受到反倾销的指控。尤其是上世纪九十年代以来,中国作为世界贸易大国地位的确立把中国推到了国际经济贸易的风口浪尖上,使得中国与欧盟、美国、日本等发达国家的贸易摩擦越演越烈,国外对中国发起的反倾销数量与日剧增,致使中国的国际贸易屡遭创伤,各国对我出口产品的频频反倾销已经构成了对我国经贸发展的实质性障碍。在发达国家纷纷向我国发起反倾销措施的同时,大量的美国、欧盟等发达国家的国内产品也正在以倾销的方式进入中国,给中国的国内相关产业造成了损失。但是由于我国在反倾销方面的立法不完善、组织机构设置不紧密、反倾销意识的淡薄、反倾销手段的不成熟等导致我国在面临国外产品的危害时没有积极有效的应对策略。这也就是进些年虽然中国对外发起的反倾销案件在数量上有所增加,但在质量上仍然有限的原因。 本文就是以中国向美国、欧盟发起关于耐磨纸倾销案为背景,以WTO《反倾销协议》为基本理论框架、以《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》为具体法律依据对中国反倾销进行分析。本文主要从四个部分进行分析。第一部分主要以案例为基准,在概述案例的基础上分析我国的反倾销立法概况、对倾销与反倾销的具体规定,进而分析对本案决定发起反倾销调查的主要认定依据。第二部分主要是在WTO的理论框架下,结合中国现有的立法,具体从事实方面与法律方面来分析本案的焦点问题。第三部分结合中国国反倾销的现状来分析反倾销的积极与消极的经济效应,进而对发起反倾销调查进行理性的思考。第四部分综合中国反倾销方面的不足,提出应对之策。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has been accused of anti-dumping because of its non-market economy status and the rapid growth of its foreign trade. In particular, since the 1990s, the establishment of China's status as a major trading power in the world has pushed China to the forefront of international economic and trade affairs, making trade frictions between China and developed countries such as the European Union, the United States, Japan and other developed countries more and more intense. The number and daily increase of anti-dumping launched by foreign countries against China have caused China's international trade to be traumatized repeatedly. The frequent anti-dumping of China's export products has already constituted a substantial obstacle to the development of China's economy and trade. While developed countries have launched anti-dumping measures against China, a large number of developed countries, such as the United States, the European Union and other domestic products are also dumping into China, causing losses to China's domestic related industries. However, due to the imperfection of our country's antidumping legislation, the lack of close organization, the weak awareness of anti-dumping and the immature of anti-dumping measures, China has no active and effective countermeasures in the face of the harm of foreign products. This is why the number of anti-dumping cases initiated by China has increased, but the quality is still limited. This paper is based on the case of wear-resistant paper dumping initiated by China to the United States and the European Union, taking the Anti-dumping Agreement of WTO as the basic theoretical framework, and taking the Anti-dumping regulations of the people's Republic of China as the specific legal basis to analyze China's anti-dumping. This article mainly carries on the analysis from four parts. The first part is mainly based on the case, on the basis of an overview of the case analysis of China's anti-dumping legislation, dumping and anti-dumping specific provisions, and then analyzed the decision to initiate anti-dumping investigation of the main basis of the case. The second part is mainly under the WTO theory frame, unifies the Chinese present legislation, concretely from the fact aspect and the legal aspect to analyze the case the focal point question. The third part analyzes the positive and negative economic effects of antidumping combined with the current situation of anti-dumping in China, and then carries on rational thinking on initiating anti-dumping investigation. The fourth part synthesizes China's anti-dumping deficiency and puts forward countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:F752.02;D996
本文编号:2245505
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has been accused of anti-dumping because of its non-market economy status and the rapid growth of its foreign trade. In particular, since the 1990s, the establishment of China's status as a major trading power in the world has pushed China to the forefront of international economic and trade affairs, making trade frictions between China and developed countries such as the European Union, the United States, Japan and other developed countries more and more intense. The number and daily increase of anti-dumping launched by foreign countries against China have caused China's international trade to be traumatized repeatedly. The frequent anti-dumping of China's export products has already constituted a substantial obstacle to the development of China's economy and trade. While developed countries have launched anti-dumping measures against China, a large number of developed countries, such as the United States, the European Union and other domestic products are also dumping into China, causing losses to China's domestic related industries. However, due to the imperfection of our country's antidumping legislation, the lack of close organization, the weak awareness of anti-dumping and the immature of anti-dumping measures, China has no active and effective countermeasures in the face of the harm of foreign products. This is why the number of anti-dumping cases initiated by China has increased, but the quality is still limited. This paper is based on the case of wear-resistant paper dumping initiated by China to the United States and the European Union, taking the Anti-dumping Agreement of WTO as the basic theoretical framework, and taking the Anti-dumping regulations of the people's Republic of China as the specific legal basis to analyze China's anti-dumping. This article mainly carries on the analysis from four parts. The first part is mainly based on the case, on the basis of an overview of the case analysis of China's anti-dumping legislation, dumping and anti-dumping specific provisions, and then analyzed the decision to initiate anti-dumping investigation of the main basis of the case. The second part is mainly under the WTO theory frame, unifies the Chinese present legislation, concretely from the fact aspect and the legal aspect to analyze the case the focal point question. The third part analyzes the positive and negative economic effects of antidumping combined with the current situation of anti-dumping in China, and then carries on rational thinking on initiating anti-dumping investigation. The fourth part synthesizes China's anti-dumping deficiency and puts forward countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:F752.02;D996
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许丹;;反倾销会计下中外成本核算差异及对策思考[J];财会月刊;2012年01期
2 邢乃千;;WTO规则与我国反倾销法的完善[J];财经政法资讯;2006年01期
3 方潇;中国反倾销立法的缺陷和完善[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2002年02期
4 郭寿康;;加入世界贸易组织与我国立法的有关问题[J];法学家;2001年02期
5 程卫东;国与国之间的利益协调——国际反倾销法的晚近发展[J];国际贸易;2001年08期
6 陈汉林;;美国对华反倾销的贸易转移效应分析及对策[J];国际贸易;2008年09期
7 李邦君;入世后中国外贸结构的新变化及其发展新趋势[J];国际商务研究;2005年03期
8 龚家友,滕玉华;中国反倾销实施中的投资跨越效应分析[J];华东经济管理;2005年08期
9 方勇,张二震;出口产品反倾销预警的经济学研究[J];经济研究;2004年01期
10 鲍晓华;中国实施反倾销措施的经济效应分析[J];经济纵横;2004年01期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 PHO DANIEL(符勇);反倾销法与公平贸易研究[D];西南政法大学;2003年
2 陈明聪;经济全球化趋势下反倾销的法律问题研究[D];华东政法学院;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 史云庆;反倾销产业损害及因果关系评判的多因素研究[D];北京化工大学;2005年
2 郑丽娜;WTO规则下我国反倾销立法与实践的研究[D];大连海事大学;2003年
,本文编号:2245505
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2245505.html