论反倾销调查程序中证据规则的应用
发布时间：2018-10-05 19:28
【摘要】：随着国际贸易的不断发展，倾销也经历了不同的阶段，它起源于重商主义时期的“奖出罚入”的贸易政策，是以扩大产品的市场份额，增加贸易顺差为目的，至今已经有很久远的历史了。倾销实质上是一种不正当的竞争行为，出口商希望通过倾销来打击进口国同类产品的市场份额，以此来打击竞争对手，在进口国市场上获得长久的优势地位，这种行为是应当通过进口国的国内的反不正当竞争法或者垄断法来调整的。今天，反倾销已经成为各国贸易重要的非关税壁垒，是一种变相的贸易保护形式。如果我国要很好地利用反倾销机制，是需要有完善、合理、公正、可操作性的反倾销程序来支持的，而这其中的关键的部分就是证据问题，只有正确得把握证据的相关的规定、不利的举证后果才能更好地运用反倾销机制来达到保护本国产业的目的。 本文主要从反倾销调查过程的证据规则这一角度来对我国的反倾销机制来进行研究，共分为四章。第一章是对反倾销调查程序概念、性质的介绍，，结合证据的定义、作用，对反倾销调查程序证据规则这一概念作了新的厘定，并突出比较反倾销立案程序与反倾销调查程序的异同；第一章的后半部分着重介绍GATT/WTO时期的立法演进过程，对其中涉及调查过程中的证据规则作了总结。第二章介绍了WTO框架下关于反倾销调查程序证据规则的分类，主要是根据不同证据规则所起的作用来划分，分为证据提供主体的规则，证据提供的期限规则，信息保密规则，证据核实规则及可获得最佳信息规则。第三章分别介绍了美国、欧盟对反倾销调查过程涉及证据方面分别作了相关的总结，对这些国家或地区的涉及证据的规定的重要规则作了重点的介绍。文章的第四部分是对我国反倾销法的立法和实践作了介绍，结合反倾销证据规则具体的案例，对我国的反倾销的立法和实践提出建议。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of international trade, dumping also experienced different stages. It originated in the mercantilist period of "reward out penalty" trade policy, with the purpose of expanding the market share of products and increasing trade surplus. There is a long history so far. Dumping is essentially an unfair competitive act. Exporters hope to crack down on the market share of similar products in the importing country by dumping, so as to strike a blow at their competitors and gain a long-term advantage in the market of the importing country. This behavior should be regulated by the domestic anti-unfair competition law or the ridge-cutting law of the importing country. Today, anti-dumping has become an important non-tariff barrier and a disguised form of trade protection. If China wants to make good use of the anti-dumping mechanism, it needs a sound, reasonable, fair and operational anti-dumping procedure to support it, and the key part of this is the evidence problem. Only by correctly grasping the relevant provisions of the evidence, Adverse consequences of proof can better use the anti-dumping mechanism to achieve the purpose of protecting domestic industries. This paper mainly studies the anti-dumping mechanism of China from the point of view of the rules of evidence in the process of anti-dumping investigation, which is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the introduction of the concept and nature of anti-dumping investigation procedure, combined with the definition and function of evidence, and makes a new definition of the concept of the rules of evidence of anti-dumping investigation procedure. The second half of the first chapter focuses on the legislative evolution of the period of GATT/WTO, and summarizes the rules of evidence involved in the process of investigation. The second chapter introduces the classification of evidence rules of anti-dumping investigation procedure under the framework of WTO, which is divided into the rules of the main body of evidence, the time limit of providing evidence and the rules of information confidentiality according to the function of different rules of evidence. Evidence verification rules and best available information rules. The third chapter introduces the United States and the European Union respectively to the anti-dumping investigation process involved in evidence aspects of the relevant summary of these countries or regions of the important rules relating to evidence made a focus on the introduction. The fourth part introduces the legislation and practice of our country's anti-dumping law, and puts forward some suggestions on our country's antidumping legislation and practice in combination with the specific cases of anti-dumping evidence rules.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
本文编号：2254595
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of international trade, dumping also experienced different stages. It originated in the mercantilist period of "reward out penalty" trade policy, with the purpose of expanding the market share of products and increasing trade surplus. There is a long history so far. Dumping is essentially an unfair competitive act. Exporters hope to crack down on the market share of similar products in the importing country by dumping, so as to strike a blow at their competitors and gain a long-term advantage in the market of the importing country. This behavior should be regulated by the domestic anti-unfair competition law or the ridge-cutting law of the importing country. Today, anti-dumping has become an important non-tariff barrier and a disguised form of trade protection. If China wants to make good use of the anti-dumping mechanism, it needs a sound, reasonable, fair and operational anti-dumping procedure to support it, and the key part of this is the evidence problem. Only by correctly grasping the relevant provisions of the evidence, Adverse consequences of proof can better use the anti-dumping mechanism to achieve the purpose of protecting domestic industries. This paper mainly studies the anti-dumping mechanism of China from the point of view of the rules of evidence in the process of anti-dumping investigation, which is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the introduction of the concept and nature of anti-dumping investigation procedure, combined with the definition and function of evidence, and makes a new definition of the concept of the rules of evidence of anti-dumping investigation procedure. The second half of the first chapter focuses on the legislative evolution of the period of GATT/WTO, and summarizes the rules of evidence involved in the process of investigation. The second chapter introduces the classification of evidence rules of anti-dumping investigation procedure under the framework of WTO, which is divided into the rules of the main body of evidence, the time limit of providing evidence and the rules of information confidentiality according to the function of different rules of evidence. Evidence verification rules and best available information rules. The third chapter introduces the United States and the European Union respectively to the anti-dumping investigation process involved in evidence aspects of the relevant summary of these countries or regions of the important rules relating to evidence made a focus on the introduction. The fourth part introduces the legislation and practice of our country's anti-dumping law, and puts forward some suggestions on our country's antidumping legislation and practice in combination with the specific cases of anti-dumping evidence rules.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 刘新宇;试析美国对华第一起特殊保障措施案[J];当代法学;2003年09期
2 陈明聪,陶立峰;反倾销调查中证据提供的法律问题[J];法学;2004年06期
3 海闻;李清亮;;加入WTO十年来中国对外反倾销实践分析[J];国际商务研究;2011年03期
4 张炳生;姚立国;蒋敏;;中美轮胎特保案的法律困境及WTO下的贸易政策[J];宁波大学学报(人文科学版);2010年01期
5 黄志瑾;;中美轮胎特保案专家组报告评析——败诉的启示[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2011年02期
6 丁国民;;立法破解对华贸易保护危机——基于WTO框架下的中国反倾销立法思考[J];中国社会科学院研究生院学报;2010年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 孙娜;关于印度反倾销机制问题的研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
2 张兰;论WTO框架下反倾销调查程序中的证据问题[D];中国政法大学;2007年
3 杨刚;欧盟反倾销法律制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2003年
本文编号：2254595
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2254595.html
