论我国承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的程序规则

发布时间：2018-10-11 13:24

【摘要】：我国是《纽约公约》的缔约国,对于符合《纽约公约》条件的外国仲裁裁决有义务承认与执行。但是,我国目前承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的程序规则存在着诸多弊端和立法空白,导致法院在审查外国仲裁裁决时无法可依、审查效率低下,当事人的权益难以及时有效的实现。我国现行的程序规则已不能满足司法实践的需要,亟需完善。本文从介绍外国仲裁裁决的不同标准入手,对文章所采外国裁决之标准进行了界定,分析了我国目前承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的做法及弊端,阐述了国外先进国家的仲裁立法,通过比较研究和实证研究,提出了完善承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的程序规则的建议。本文分为三章。第一章外国仲裁裁决承认与执行程序规则概述。首先介绍了外国仲裁裁决认定标准,介绍了国际上和我国及本文的界定标准。其次阐述了承认与执行的概念和关系。最后对本文的核心概念程序规则进行了论述,并说明笔者采取定义的理由。第二章我国承认与执行外国仲裁裁决程序规则的现状及问题。该部分全面地介绍和分析了目前我国承认与执行外国仲裁裁决程序规则之现状及存在的问题,包括申请、管辖、时限、审查范围及内部报告制度,分析指出了各个程序环节所暴露的弊端。第三章完善我国承认与执行外国仲裁裁决程序规则的建议。本部分提出了我国承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的具体完善建议：规范申请材料、延长申请期限、确定民事涉外庭审查、明确立案及答辩期限、限制审查范围、构建听证制度、建立上诉制度,并在其中列举了一些外国先进国家的立法和我国的规定进行对比,希望可以对我国的司法实践起到一定的借鉴作用。
[Abstract]:China is a signatory to the New York Convention, and is obliged to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards which meet the requirements of the New York Convention. However, there are many drawbacks and legislative gaps in the rules of procedure for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in China at present, which leads to the inefficiency of the review of foreign arbitral awards. The rights and interests of the parties are difficult to be realized in a timely and effective manner. The current procedural rules in our country can not meet the needs of judicial practice and need to be perfected. This paper begins with the introduction of different standards of foreign arbitral awards, defines the standards adopted in the article, analyzes the practices and drawbacks of recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards in China, and expounds the arbitration legislation of advanced countries abroad. Through comparative and empirical studies, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the procedural rules for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. This paper is divided into three chapters. Chapter I Summary of rules of procedure for recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. First, it introduces the standards of foreign arbitration awards, the international and China, and the definition standard of this article. Secondly, it expounds the concept and relation of recognition and enforcement. Finally, this paper discusses the core concept of procedural rules, and explains the reasons for the author to take the definition. Chapter two: the status quo and problems of the rules of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in China. This part comprehensively introduces and analyzes the current situation and existing problems of the rules of procedure for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in China, including application, jurisdiction, time limit, scope of review and internal reporting system. The disadvantages of each procedure are analyzed and pointed out. The third chapter consummates our country recognition and the enforcement foreign arbitration award procedure rule suggestion. In this part, the author puts forward some specific suggestions for the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: standardizing the application materials, extending the application period, determining the civil foreign court examination, defining the time limit of filing and defending, limiting the scope of examination, and constructing the hearing system. It is hoped that the establishment of appeal system and the comparison between the legislation of some foreign advanced countries and the provisions of our country can serve as a reference for the judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4;D925.1

【参考文献】