南海仲裁案实体裁决的岛礁法律地位判定:法律悖误与中国应对
发布时间：2018-10-17 14:11
【摘要】：中菲南海争端的实质是相关岛礁的领土主权争端以及与之相关的海域划界争端。菲律宾无视中国将南沙群岛作为一个整体主张权利的事实,将南沙群岛进行分割,要求对中国占领或控制的9个岛礁的海洋权利进行逐一判定。仲裁庭无视自身对争端主题事项并无管辖权的事实,错误地认定事实与适用法律,使用本末倒置、自相矛盾的论证方式支持了菲律宾几乎全部的仲裁请求。面对已经作出的仲裁裁决,中国的当务之急是加强对裁决书细节的分析研究,在法理上进行有理有据的批驳,为中国“不接受、不承认”的立场找出正当的依据。从长远看,中国还应为今后可能出现的连锁反应提前做好对案,而最理想、最有效的对案就是证明中国在南海是以“群岛”为单位主张海洋权利以及洋中群岛制度适用于南海四大群岛具有习惯国际法的基础,防止中国在南海的权利被“切割”。
[Abstract]:The essence of the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines is the territorial sovereignty dispute between the islands and reefs and the maritime delimitation dispute. Ignoring the fact that China claims the Nansha Islands as a whole, the Philippines divides the Spratly Islands and demands that the maritime rights of the nine islands and reefs under China's occupation or control be determined one by one. Ignoring the fact that it does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dispute, the arbitral tribunal wrongly finds the facts and applicable law, uses the reverse of the cart and contradicts the argument to support almost all the arbitration requests of the Philippines. In the face of the arbitration award that has been made, China's urgent task is to strengthen the analysis and study of the details of the award, and to refute the legal principles in order to find a legitimate basis for China's stand of "not accepting and not recognizing." In the long run, China should also prepare the case in advance for the possible chain reaction in the future, and ideally, The most effective case is to prove that China claims maritime rights on the basis of "islands" in the South China Sea, and that the application of the "mid-ocean archipelago" system to the four islands in the South China Sea has the basis of customary international law to prevent China's rights in the South China Sea from being "cut".
【作者单位】： 吉林大学法学院;
【分类号】：D993.5
本文编号：2276929
[Abstract]:The essence of the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines is the territorial sovereignty dispute between the islands and reefs and the maritime delimitation dispute. Ignoring the fact that China claims the Nansha Islands as a whole, the Philippines divides the Spratly Islands and demands that the maritime rights of the nine islands and reefs under China's occupation or control be determined one by one. Ignoring the fact that it does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the dispute, the arbitral tribunal wrongly finds the facts and applicable law, uses the reverse of the cart and contradicts the argument to support almost all the arbitration requests of the Philippines. In the face of the arbitration award that has been made, China's urgent task is to strengthen the analysis and study of the details of the award, and to refute the legal principles in order to find a legitimate basis for China's stand of "not accepting and not recognizing." In the long run, China should also prepare the case in advance for the possible chain reaction in the future, and ideally, The most effective case is to prove that China claims maritime rights on the basis of "islands" in the South China Sea, and that the application of the "mid-ocean archipelago" system to the four islands in the South China Sea has the basis of customary international law to prevent China's rights in the South China Sea from being "cut".
【作者单位】： 吉林大学法学院;
【分类号】：D993.5
【相似文献】
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 姜世波;习惯国际法的司法确定[D];山东大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 邓荷琳;美国投资条约实践中的习惯国际法问题[D];厦门大学;2014年
2 刘懿德;论“或引渡或起诉”义务[D];外交学院;2011年
，本文编号：2276929
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2276929.html
