从香蕉卡特尔案看欧盟对协同行为的认定
发布时间：2018-10-17 19:46
【摘要】：协同行为是卡特尔的一种表现形式。认定协同行为需要证实当事人之间存在意思上的联络、由意思联络而达成的市场上的一致行为以及意思联络与一致行为之间的因果关系。由于无法轻易得到直接证据,竞争执法机构往往要依靠充分的间接证据证明存在协同行为。在香蕉卡特尔案中,欧盟委员会认定经销商在行情价格确定前一天通过电话进行沟通,从而对香蕉的参考行情价格进行协调,构成了反竞争的协同行为。该案对理解协同行为具有一定的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Synergistic behavior is a form of cartel. It is necessary to confirm the existence of the meaning connection between the parties, the consistent behavior in the market reached by the will liaison, and the causality between the intention liaison and the consistent behavior. Since direct evidence is not readily available, competition enforcement agencies often rely on sufficient circumstantial evidence to prove synergy. In the banana cartel case, the European Commission found that dealers communicated by telephone the day before the market price was set, thus coordinating the reference prices of bananas, which constituted an anti-competitive synergistic act. This case has certain reference significance to understand the synergetic behavior.
【作者单位】： 中国世界贸易组织研究会竞争政策与法律专业委员会;
【分类号】：D996.1
[Abstract]:Synergistic behavior is a form of cartel. It is necessary to confirm the existence of the meaning connection between the parties, the consistent behavior in the market reached by the will liaison, and the causality between the intention liaison and the consistent behavior. Since direct evidence is not readily available, competition enforcement agencies often rely on sufficient circumstantial evidence to prove synergy. In the banana cartel case, the European Commission found that dealers communicated by telephone the day before the market price was set, thus coordinating the reference prices of bananas, which constituted an anti-competitive synergistic act. This case has certain reference significance to understand the synergetic behavior.
【作者单位】： 中国世界贸易组织研究会竞争政策与法律专业委员会;
【分类号】：D996.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丰畸光卫;姚梅镇;;经济法[J];法学评论;1980年03期
2 董t犛，
本文编号：2277762
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2277762.html
