投资者—国家间争端解决仲裁机制研究
发布时间：2018-10-22 12:49
【摘要】：随着当前世界经济的深入发展以及国际投资自由化程度的提高,以条约为基础的解决投资者与投资东道国间投资争议的国际仲裁机制,在其自身国际商事仲裁属性所致缺陷尚未解决的背景下,又迎来了新的法律问题。随着各国吸引外资和鼓励对外投资政策的深入推进,国际投资环境整体改善。与此同时,近年投资者-国家间仲裁案件数量呈快速上升趋势,这一趋势反映了投资者-国家间争端解决仲裁机制的重要特点。在对中外投资协定内容比较分析的基础之上,审视投资者-国家间仲裁机制面临的重要问题,并根据投资者-国家间仲裁实践的新发展,完善中外投资条约的相关规定,显得尤为必要。 本文除引言和结论外,正文分为四个部分。 第一部分概述了以条约为基础的投资者-国家间争端解决仲裁机制。首先,就这一机制形成的历史和近年发展现状进行简要阐述。其次,就这一机制主要基础概念进行阐述。 第二部分分析了以条约为基础的投资者-国家间争端解决仲裁机制的管辖权问题,其中阐述了以条约为基础的投资者-国家间争端管辖权基础,并对当前最为重要的投资者-国家间争端解决机制的实现机制之一,即ICSID仲裁管辖权特殊性进行论述。 第三部分论述了投资者-国家间争端解决仲裁的法律适用问题,包括仲裁程序方面的法律适用问题和仲裁实体方面的法律适用问题。 第四部分通过对投资者-国家间仲裁发展实践中的具体问题进行分析,并逐一提出针对我国的启示。首先就当前投资者-国家间争端解决仲裁机制的裁决一致性存在的问题进行阐述,并针对性的提出中国在对外缔结相关投资条约时就该问题应采取的应对方法。其次通过对NAFTA仲裁案件中公正与公平待遇标准内涵的发展变化,进一步提出中外投资条约中应完善内容。再次就阿根廷危机引起的就该国提起的仲裁案件数量显著增加问题进行了分析,并从中寻找对中国的重要启示。最后就近年出现的部分国家退出公约并终止BIT的现象进行分析,提出中国的应对之策。 本文通过对国际投资仲裁实践中具体问题的分析,以投资者-国家间争端解决仲裁案件裁决为基础,结合本国实际,从实证的角度就本国投资者和国家利益的维护,提出重要应对之策。
[Abstract]:With the deepening development of the current world economy and the improvement of the degree of international investment liberalization, the treaty-based international arbitration mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes between investors and host countries of investment, Under the background that the defects caused by its own attribute of international commercial arbitration have not been resolved, it ushered in new legal problems. The overall international investment environment has improved with the deepening of policies to attract foreign investment and encourage foreign investment. At the same time, the number of investor-state arbitration cases has increased rapidly in recent years, which reflects the important characteristics of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism. On the basis of comparative analysis of the contents of Sino-foreign investment agreements, this paper examines the important problems faced by investor-state arbitration mechanism, and consummates the relevant provisions of Sino-foreign investment treaties according to the new development of investor-state arbitration practice. It is especially necessary. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism based on treaty. First of all, the formation of this mechanism and the recent development of the history of a brief description. Secondly, the main basic concepts of this mechanism are expounded. The second part analyzes the jurisdiction of treaty-based investor-State dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, which describes the treaty-based basis of investor-State dispute jurisdiction. It also discusses the particularity of ICSID arbitration jurisdiction, one of the most important investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. The third part discusses the legal application of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration, including the legal application of arbitration procedure and arbitration entity. The fourth part analyzes the specific problems in the practice of investor-state arbitration and puts forward the enlightenment one by one for our country. First of all, this paper expounds the problems existing in the consistency of the adjudication of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, and puts forward the countermeasures that China should take when concluding the relevant investment treaties with foreign countries. Secondly, through the development and change of the standard of fair and equitable treatment in NAFTA arbitration cases, the author puts forward that the contents of Chinese and foreign investment treaties should be improved. In this paper, the author analyzes the significant increase in the number of arbitration cases brought about by the Argentine crisis, and looks for some important implications for China. Finally, this paper analyzes the phenomenon of some countries withdrawing from the convention and terminating BIT in recent years, and puts forward China's countermeasures. Based on the analysis of the specific problems in the practice of international investment arbitration, this paper, on the basis of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration case award, combines the reality of our country, and from the empirical point of view, discusses the protection of national investors and national interests. Put forward important countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4
本文编号：2287202
[Abstract]:With the deepening development of the current world economy and the improvement of the degree of international investment liberalization, the treaty-based international arbitration mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes between investors and host countries of investment, Under the background that the defects caused by its own attribute of international commercial arbitration have not been resolved, it ushered in new legal problems. The overall international investment environment has improved with the deepening of policies to attract foreign investment and encourage foreign investment. At the same time, the number of investor-state arbitration cases has increased rapidly in recent years, which reflects the important characteristics of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism. On the basis of comparative analysis of the contents of Sino-foreign investment agreements, this paper examines the important problems faced by investor-state arbitration mechanism, and consummates the relevant provisions of Sino-foreign investment treaties according to the new development of investor-state arbitration practice. It is especially necessary. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, the text is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism based on treaty. First of all, the formation of this mechanism and the recent development of the history of a brief description. Secondly, the main basic concepts of this mechanism are expounded. The second part analyzes the jurisdiction of treaty-based investor-State dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, which describes the treaty-based basis of investor-State dispute jurisdiction. It also discusses the particularity of ICSID arbitration jurisdiction, one of the most important investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. The third part discusses the legal application of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration, including the legal application of arbitration procedure and arbitration entity. The fourth part analyzes the specific problems in the practice of investor-state arbitration and puts forward the enlightenment one by one for our country. First of all, this paper expounds the problems existing in the consistency of the adjudication of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration mechanism, and puts forward the countermeasures that China should take when concluding the relevant investment treaties with foreign countries. Secondly, through the development and change of the standard of fair and equitable treatment in NAFTA arbitration cases, the author puts forward that the contents of Chinese and foreign investment treaties should be improved. In this paper, the author analyzes the significant increase in the number of arbitration cases brought about by the Argentine crisis, and looks for some important implications for China. Finally, this paper analyzes the phenomenon of some countries withdrawing from the convention and terminating BIT in recent years, and puts forward China's countermeasures. Based on the analysis of the specific problems in the practice of international investment arbitration, this paper, on the basis of investor-state dispute settlement arbitration case award, combines the reality of our country, and from the empirical point of view, discusses the protection of national investors and national interests. Put forward important countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 叶兴平;《北美自由贸易协定》争端解决机制的创新及意义[J];当代法学;2002年07期
2 沈慧骅;国家和私人间投资争端解决机制的冲突和协调——兼比较WTO与ICSID争端解决机制的冲突和协调[J];当代法学;2003年11期
3 刘笋;;国际投资仲裁裁决的不一致性问题及其解决[J];法商研究;2009年06期
4 向玉兰;;“BIT条款”和“协议条款”对ICSID管辖权的影响[J];法学杂志;2006年01期
5 蔡从燕;;外国投资者利用国际投资仲裁机制新发展反思——国际法实施机制与南北矛盾的双重视角[J];法学家;2007年03期
6 黄华;;国际投资仲裁研究及上诉机制探讨[J];法制与社会;2009年34期
7 陈安;;中外双边投资协定中的四大“安全阀”不宜贸然拆除——美、加型BITs谈判范本关键性“争端解决”条款剖析[J];国际经济法学刊;2006年01期
8 李万强;;晚近美国对国际投资争端仲裁机制态度的转变——以NAFTA为例[J];国际经济法学刊;2006年01期
9 沈志韬;;论国际投资仲裁正当性危机[J];时代法学;2010年02期
10 梁丹妮;;美式投资条约的新近发展对中国的启示[J];云南社会科学;2007年02期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 石慧;以条约为基础的投资者与国家间仲裁机制的评判[D];华东政法学院;2007年
2 林爱民;国际投资协定争议仲裁研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 马凌;国际投资争端解决机制的构建研究[D];天津财经学院;2005年
2 马迅;《北美自由贸易协定》第十一章争议解决机制研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
3 林笑霞;国际投资仲裁中危急情况的适用[D];厦门大学;2009年
，本文编号：2287202
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2287202.html
