国际法院咨询意见背景下科索沃独立合法性置疑

发布时间：2018-11-01 11:01

【摘要】：国际法学界对于科索沃问题的研究历来颇具争议，，以最新出台的科索沃国际法院咨询意见为研究主体对这一问题的再度研究具有重要的理论意义。国际法院就科索沃问题公布的咨询意见虽然没有强制力，但是其影响力却是巨大的，它有可能打破现今国际社会稳定的格局，影响和谐的国际秩序，对于这一问题的研究更具有现实意义。本文将采用理论分析法、规范分析法、对比分析法和例证法相结合的综合分析法进行研究。本文主要将以最新发布的科索沃独立国际法院咨询意见为背景，分析国际法院咨询意见的背景、特征，着重对国际法院咨询意见涉及到的程序和实体问题进行研究。国际法院咨询意见虽然没有强制力，但是却有极大的影响力，它的价值在于为联合国提供参考性建议。咨询意见发布后，它也成为各国分裂势力的风向标，它所产生的消极影响远远大于它的积极影响，透过科索沃独立国际法院咨询意见的剖析来反思科索沃要想独立成为一个国家需要满足的条件，反思国际法院咨询意见到底违反了那些国际法原理。从研究成果上看，科索沃独立必须满足国家构成的要件，需要符合联合国决议的法律效力，还应该对民族自决权合法、适当的运用。虽然国际法院宣布科索沃单方面宣布独立没有违反国际法的相关规定，但并不能就些认为其独立是成立的。本篇文章希望借助对科索沃国际法院咨询意见的解读和对理论的研究，提出科索沃独立不合法的国际法理论依据，对存在类似分离势力和活动的国家给予法律上的警示和根据，履行一名法律人的社会使命和责任。
[Abstract]:The research on Kosovo has always been controversial in the field of international law. It is of great theoretical significance to take the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of Kosovo as the research subject. The advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice on the question of Kosovo, although not coercive, has enormous influence and is likely to break the present pattern of stability in the international community and affect a harmonious international order, The study of this problem has more practical significance. In this paper, a comprehensive analysis method combining theoretical analysis, normative analysis, comparative analysis and illustrative analysis is adopted. Based on the newly issued advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in Kosovo, this paper will analyze the background and characteristics of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, focusing on the procedural and substantive issues involved in the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice. The advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice, although not coercive, has great influence, and its value lies in providing the United Nations with reference advice. After the advisory opinion was issued, it also became a bellwether of separatist forces in various countries, and its negative impact was far greater than its positive impact. Through the analysis of the advisory opinion of the Independent International Court of Justice in Kosovo, this paper reflects on the conditions that Kosovo needs to satisfy if it wants to become an independent state, and reflects on the principles of international law that the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice has violated. From the point of view of the research results, the independence of Kosovo must meet the requirements of the constitution of the state, the legal effect of the UN resolutions, and the legitimate and proper application of the right of national self-determination. Although the declaration by the International Court of Justice of Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence does not violate the relevant provisions of international law, it cannot be regarded as valid. This article hopes that with the help of the interpretation of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice in Kosovo and the study of theory, this article will put forward the theoretical basis of international law for Kosovo's independence and illegality, and give legal warnings and bases to countries with similar separatist forces and activities. Fulfill the social mission and responsibility of a legal person.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】