可再生能源政策与WTO补贴制度的相符性分析——以加拿大可再生能源案为中心的考察
发布时间：2018-11-03 19:32
【摘要】：尽管可再生能源发电产业政策的合理性被广泛认可,但这类政策与WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》的相符性问题并不甚明确。加拿大可再生能源案第一次将这一问题带到WTO上诉机构面前。虽然补贴与反补贴自身缺乏对补贴合理性予以认可的文本基础,但是上诉机构创造性地解读了补贴认定中的"利益"要件,认为政府通过"混合能源供给"政策为风能和太阳能电力创设一个新的市场本身并不构成补贴。这一解读认可了电网回购计划这类可再生能源发电政策的合理性,并会促进这一产业的发展,但是,上诉机构对于《补贴与反补贴措施协定》中"利益"要件的解读与协定的整体结构和内在逻辑相悖离。当WTO争端解决机制不断面临新问题和新发展的挑战,而多边贸易谈判机制裹足不前无法提供新的规则供给时,上诉机构的司法创造需要更具法律理性的推理予以支持。
[Abstract]:Although the rationality of the renewable energy generation industry policy is widely accepted, the compatibility of such policies with the WTO Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures is not very clear. The Canadian Renewable Energy case brought the issue before the WTO Appellate body for the first time. Although the subsidy and countervailing itself lack the textual basis to approve the rationality of the subsidy, the appellate body creatively interprets the "benefit" element in the subsidy confirmation. The idea that creating a new market for wind and solar power through the government's "mixed energy supply" policy does not in itself constitute a subsidy. This interpretation recognizes the rationality of renewable energy generation policies such as grid buy-back schemes and will boost the industry, but, The interpretation of the "benefit" in the Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures by the Appellate body contradicts the overall structure and internal logic of the Agreement. When the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is confronted with new problems and new challenges, and the multilateral trade negotiation mechanism is unable to provide new rules, the judicial creation of the appellate body needs to be supported by more rational reasoning.
【作者单位】： 清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D996.1
[Abstract]:Although the rationality of the renewable energy generation industry policy is widely accepted, the compatibility of such policies with the WTO Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures is not very clear. The Canadian Renewable Energy case brought the issue before the WTO Appellate body for the first time. Although the subsidy and countervailing itself lack the textual basis to approve the rationality of the subsidy, the appellate body creatively interprets the "benefit" element in the subsidy confirmation. The idea that creating a new market for wind and solar power through the government's "mixed energy supply" policy does not in itself constitute a subsidy. This interpretation recognizes the rationality of renewable energy generation policies such as grid buy-back schemes and will boost the industry, but, The interpretation of the "benefit" in the Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures by the Appellate body contradicts the overall structure and internal logic of the Agreement. When the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is confronted with new problems and new challenges, and the multilateral trade negotiation mechanism is unable to provide new rules, the judicial creation of the appellate body needs to be supported by more rational reasoning.
【作者单位】： 清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D996.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;我国积极推动可再生能源产业发展[J];领导决策信息;2000年49期
2 苗俊杰;“激励”可再生能源开发[J];w挛胖芸，
本文编号：2308774
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2308774.html
