当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

论公共秩序保留制度及其在我国的适用及完善

发布时间:2018-11-09 16:10
【摘要】:国际私法赖以存在的基础是涉外民商事关系中承认外国法的域外效力,并根据冲突规范的指引而适用外国法。但是在国际私法中有一项重要的制度,就是“公共秩序保留制度”。它是为限制和排除外国法在本国的适用而制定的,其目的是为了维护本国的社会公共利益,二者显然是相互矛盾的。然而纵观整个国际私法的发展史,我们不难看出,国际私法的发展是在一方面适用外国法,一方面限制或排除适用外国法的矛盾中前进的。 “公共秩序保留制度”在各国适用缺乏统一规则的控制和引导,这会直接导致各国法官在判案时自由裁量权的扩大,从而损害到司法的公正和法律的权威,这会降低国际私法在协调各国法律冲突中的价值。 本文从公共秩序保留制度的概念和内涵出发,探究了这一制度在国际私法中的作用、适用条件及排除外国法后的法律适用问题。对于公共秩序保留制度,不仅需要有相应的限制规定,还要防止法官自由裁量权的滥用。 我国对于公共秩序保留制度,是持肯定态度的,但也存在很多问题和不足。我国要从立法上对其加以规范,弥补现有法律的不足。
[Abstract]:The existence of private international law is based on the recognition of the extraterritorial effects of foreign laws in civil and commercial relations involving foreign countries and the application of foreign laws according to the guidance of conflict norms. However, there is an important system in private international law, that is, the reservation of public order. It is made to limit and exclude the application of foreign law in our country, and its purpose is to safeguard the social and public interests of our country. However, throughout the history of private international law, it is not difficult to see that the development of private international law advances in the contradiction of the application of foreign law on the one hand and the restriction or exclusion of the application of foreign law on the other. The lack of control and guidance of uniform rules in the application of the "Public order Reservation system" will directly lead to the expansion of the discretion of judges in the adjudication of cases, thereby undermining the justice of justice and the authority of the law. This reduces the value of private international law in reconciling conflicts of laws between countries. Starting from the concept and connotation of public order reservation system, this paper probes into the role of this system in private international law, the applicable conditions and the legal application after excluding foreign law. For the reservation of public order, not only should there be corresponding restrictions, but also the abuse of the judge's discretion should be prevented. Our country holds the affirmative attitude to the public order reservation system, but also has many problems and the insufficiency. Our country should regulate it from the legislation, make up the deficiency of the existing law.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D997;D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 甘华玖;公共秩序保留制度的限制适用[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2005年05期

2 屈广清;曲波;;公共秩序保留与弱势群体权利的保护[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2007年02期

3 徐青森;;2000年国际私法研究的回顾与展望[J];法学家;2001年01期

4 金正佳 ,郭生平;涉外海事审判中的法律适用[J];法学评论;1989年06期

5 张潇剑;国际私法上的公共政策机制之剖析[J];法学评论;2005年04期

6 李健男,,吕国民;对公共秩序保留制度的反思与展望[J];法学评论;1996年04期

7 江龙兵;;浅析公共秩序保留制度[J];法制与社会;2008年32期

8 姚杨;;浅议我国公共秩序保留制度[J];法制与社会;2011年06期

9 杨威;令狐情;;海峡两岸区际冲突法中公共秩序保留制度的和谐发展[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2007年05期

10 徐伟功;国际私法中的自由裁量权论纲[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2002年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 沈涓;[N];财经时报;2004年



本文编号:2320903

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2320903.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c3e23***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com