服务贸易原产地的确定
发布时间：2018-11-13 16:45
【摘要】：当今,经济全球化深入发展,服务业在世界经济的发展中所占比重迅速扩张,其增长速度快于货物贸易的增长。《服务贸易总协定》(GATS)就是在这种经济发展背景中产生,是全球范围内第一套规制国际服务贸易的多边规则与框架体系。服务贸易领域逐渐成为国内外学者关注的热门课题,却鲜有人对GATS条文进行细致解读,特别是很少有人对服务贸易领域原产地确定这一个基础理论问题进行关注和研究。出于当前这种研究现状,笔者选取该问题进行初步研究。 整篇文章共三部分:引言、正文、结语。正文分四个章节进行阐述: 第一章是对服务贸易原产地规则概述。首先对原产地、原产地规则的概念、由来以及服务原产地规则的缺位现状作出简要介绍,接着通过总结服务贸易的特点阐述了服务原产地规则确立的必要性以及不能把货物贸易原产地规则直接适用于服务贸易领域的原因。 第二章为分析GATS下的服务原产地规则。首先介绍了GATS划分的四种服务提供方式,并将其分成两类来探讨服务来源问题。本部分着重于法人服务提供者的来源地识别,特别是在商业存在的情况下,应该区分多种情形。笔者引入“第三次欧共体香蕉案”与“加拿大汽车案”对这些标准做了实证分析和总结。 第三章是通过分析区域一体化协定及中国法律规范中的原产地规则作比较研究。本章分别总结和评价了NAFTA与欧盟服务原产地规则,并着重分析了以CEPA为代表的我国的服务原产地规则,而后对此进行了简要评价。 第四章引入实质性投入标准,以期解决GATS现有原产地规则存在的几种适用困难的情形。笔者以货物贸易领域的增值标准作为借鉴,分析实质性投入标准的合理性、可行性及现实中可能存在的障碍问题,提出自己的思考及困惑。最后,笔者提出,这些问题并非短期内可以解决,有赖于学界更多关注及GATS成员的进一步谈判。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the deepening development of economic globalization, the proportion of service industry in the development of the world economy is expanding rapidly, and its growth rate is faster than that of trade in goods. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) has emerged in this background of economic development. It is the first set of multilateral rules and framework to regulate international trade in services. The field of trade in services has gradually become a hot topic that scholars at home and abroad pay close attention to, but few people interpret the provisions of GATS in detail, especially few people pay attention to and study the basic theoretical issue of origin determination in the field of trade in services. In view of the present research situation, the author chooses this question to carry on the preliminary research. The whole article consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is an overview of rules of origin of trade in services. First of all, a brief introduction is made to the concept of origin, the origin of rules of origin and the status quo of the absence of rules of origin for services. Then the necessity of establishing rules of origin of services and the reasons why rules of origin of trade in goods can not be directly applied to the field of trade in services are expounded by summarizing the characteristics of trade in services. The second chapter analyzes the rules of origin under GATS. This paper first introduces four kinds of service providing methods divided by GATS, and divides them into two categories to discuss the problem of service source. This section focuses on the source identification of corporate service providers, especially in the case of commercial presence, should distinguish between multiple situations. The author introduces the third Banana case of EC and the car case of Canada to make an empirical analysis and summary of these standards. The third chapter makes a comparative study by analyzing the regional integration agreement and the rules of origin in China's legal norms. This chapter summarizes and evaluates the rules of origin of service in NAFTA and EU respectively, and analyzes the rules of origin of service in China, represented by CEPA, and then gives a brief evaluation. Chapter four introduces substantive input standard to solve the difficulties of GATS existing rules of origin. The author uses the value-added standards in the field of goods trade as a reference, analyzes the rationality, feasibility and possible obstacles in reality of substantive input standards, and puts forward his own thinking and confusion. Finally, the author points out that these problems can not be solved in the short term, but depend on more academic attention and further negotiation among GATS members.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1;F746.18
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the deepening development of economic globalization, the proportion of service industry in the development of the world economy is expanding rapidly, and its growth rate is faster than that of trade in goods. The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) has emerged in this background of economic development. It is the first set of multilateral rules and framework to regulate international trade in services. The field of trade in services has gradually become a hot topic that scholars at home and abroad pay close attention to, but few people interpret the provisions of GATS in detail, especially few people pay attention to and study the basic theoretical issue of origin determination in the field of trade in services. In view of the present research situation, the author chooses this question to carry on the preliminary research. The whole article consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is an overview of rules of origin of trade in services. First of all, a brief introduction is made to the concept of origin, the origin of rules of origin and the status quo of the absence of rules of origin for services. Then the necessity of establishing rules of origin of services and the reasons why rules of origin of trade in goods can not be directly applied to the field of trade in services are expounded by summarizing the characteristics of trade in services. The second chapter analyzes the rules of origin under GATS. This paper first introduces four kinds of service providing methods divided by GATS, and divides them into two categories to discuss the problem of service source. This section focuses on the source identification of corporate service providers, especially in the case of commercial presence, should distinguish between multiple situations. The author introduces the third Banana case of EC and the car case of Canada to make an empirical analysis and summary of these standards. The third chapter makes a comparative study by analyzing the regional integration agreement and the rules of origin in China's legal norms. This chapter summarizes and evaluates the rules of origin of service in NAFTA and EU respectively, and analyzes the rules of origin of service in China, represented by CEPA, and then gives a brief evaluation. Chapter four introduces substantive input standard to solve the difficulties of GATS existing rules of origin. The author uses the value-added standards in the field of goods trade as a reference, analyzes the rationality, feasibility and possible obstacles in reality of substantive input standards, and puts forward his own thinking and confusion. Finally, the author points out that these problems can not be solved in the short term, but depend on more academic attention and further negotiation among GATS members.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1;F746.18
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 石静霞,胡荣国;区域经济一体化中的服务贸易问题[J];法学评论;2005年05期
2 姚瑶;;简析WTO《原产地规则协议》[J];法制与社会;2006年24期
3 孟国碧;;服务原产地规则设计的国际实践及思考——兼评中国的实践[J];国际经济法学刊;2008年01期
4 吴洁;;国际服务外包的发展趋势及对策[J];国际经济合作;2007年05期
5 田宝峰;论公司法人国籍制度中几个法律问题及其对完善我国公司法律的启示[J];甘肃政法成人教育学院学报;2004年01期
6 张晓君;;服务贸易多边法律制度的现状、问题与发展——以GATS为主线[J];湖湘论坛;2007年05期
7 Aaditya Mattoo ,Carsten Fink ,吴幼华,廖传杰;论区域协定和服务贸易的政策问题[J];经济资料译丛;2005年03期
8 朱慈蕴;资本多数决原则与控制股东的诚信义务[J];法学研究;2004年04期
9 厉力;;论原产地规则适用领域的扩张[J];绍兴文理学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年01期
10 周云;战pだ，
本文编号：2329725
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2329725.html
