TRIPS框架下企业商业秘密的国际保护
发布时间：2018-11-17 11:44
【摘要】：随着市场经济的深入发展,国际国内经济竞争日趋激烈,商业秘密作为竞争取胜的重要手段之一,其作用也越来越大,受到了各国的广泛关注和重视。与专利等传统知识产权相比,商业秘密具有保护范围广,保护期限长等优点,发展空间越来越大;但是对商业秘密的法律保护与救济等措施却相对落后,许多国家尤其是发展中国家并没有认识到商业秘密背后的经济价值。近年来,伴随着《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(以下简称TRIPS协定)的生效,商业秘密的国际保护趋势愈加明显。TRIPS协定对各国,尤其是发展中国家的商业秘密保护提供了法律指导。多数企业对传统知识产权保护已经形成了相应的意识,但企业对于自身商业秘密的保护仍处于一种不规范的状态,侵犯商业秘密的案件时有发生,权利得不到保障和救济。因此本文欲在TRIPS协定的框架下,通过比较研究方法,希望能对企业商业秘密的保护提供现实帮助。 本文共有四个部分,主要内容如下: 第一部分:商业秘密基本理论问题概述。 从商业秘密受保护的原因入手,对各国及国际组织对商业秘密的界定进行归纳,从而总结出商业秘密的一般特征。同时,还研究了商业秘密的范围和分类标准,尤其对客户名单这一特殊的商业秘密分析了具体的认定标准。 第二部分:TRIPS协定对商业秘密的保护与限制。 第二部分以TRIPS协定为核心,介绍了TRIPS协定对商业秘密保护的规定及法律性质的认定;着重阐述了TRIPS协定下商业秘密的构成要件:秘密性、价值性和合理措施。同时,分析了对商业秘密保护的限制,以防止权力的滥用。 第三部分:商业秘密法律救济制度的比较研究。 该部分通过比较分析方法,以TRIPS协定为蓝本,比较分析了美国、德国、日本和我国对侵犯商业秘密构成要件的法律规定以及法律救济制度。同时以民事救济为核心,深入探讨了商业秘密的禁令救济制度,并对我国提出了相应的立法建议。 第四部分:企业商业秘密保护的新课题——竞业禁止问题。 概述我国商业秘密保护的现状,介绍了竞业禁止协议对防范企业商业秘密流失的重要作用;论述了竞业禁止的有效要件,从而为企业提供了一种较为有效的保护方式。
[Abstract]:With the further development of market economy, the international and domestic economic competition is becoming more and more fierce. As one of the important means to win the competition, trade secret is playing a more and more important role. Compared with traditional intellectual property rights such as patents, trade secrets have the advantages of wide scope of protection and long term of protection. However, the legal protection and relief of trade secrets are relatively backward, and many countries, especially developing countries, do not realize the economic value behind trade secrets. In recent years, with the entry into force of the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), the trend of international protection of trade secrets has become increasingly obvious. In particular, the protection of trade secrets in developing countries provides legal guidance. Most enterprises have formed the corresponding consciousness to the protection of traditional intellectual property rights, but the protection of their own trade secrets is still in an irregular state, the cases of infringing trade secrets occur from time to time, and the rights are not guaranteed and relieved. Therefore, under the framework of TRIPS agreement, this paper hopes to provide practical help for the protection of business secrets through comparative research methods. There are four parts in this paper. The main contents are as follows: the first part: an overview of the basic theory of trade secrets. Starting with the reasons why trade secrets are protected, this paper sums up the definition of trade secrets in various countries and international organizations, and sums up the general characteristics of trade secrets. At the same time, the scope and classification criteria of trade secret are studied, especially the identification standard of customer list, which is a special trade secret. Part two: the protection and restriction of trade secret under TRIPS agreement. The second part takes the TRIPS Agreement as the core, introduces the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement on the protection of trade secrets and the recognition of its legal nature, and focuses on the constitutive requirements of trade secrets under the TRIPS Agreement: secrecy, value and reasonable measures. At the same time, it analyzes the limitation of trade secret protection to prevent abuse of power. The third part: the comparative study of the legal remedy system of trade secret. Based on the TRIPS Agreement, this part compares and analyzes the legal provisions and the legal relief system of the constitutive elements of violating trade secrets in the United States, Germany, Japan and China through the method of comparative analysis. At the same time, taking civil relief as the core, this paper probes deeply into the prohibition relief system of trade secret, and puts forward corresponding legislative suggestions to our country. The fourth part: the new topic of business secret protection-non-competition. This paper summarizes the current situation of the protection of commercial secrets in China, introduces the important role of non-compete agreement in preventing the loss of business secrets, and discusses the effective elements of the prohibition of competition, thus providing an effective way for enterprises to protect themselves.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.1;D996.1
本文编号：2337664
[Abstract]:With the further development of market economy, the international and domestic economic competition is becoming more and more fierce. As one of the important means to win the competition, trade secret is playing a more and more important role. Compared with traditional intellectual property rights such as patents, trade secrets have the advantages of wide scope of protection and long term of protection. However, the legal protection and relief of trade secrets are relatively backward, and many countries, especially developing countries, do not realize the economic value behind trade secrets. In recent years, with the entry into force of the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), the trend of international protection of trade secrets has become increasingly obvious. In particular, the protection of trade secrets in developing countries provides legal guidance. Most enterprises have formed the corresponding consciousness to the protection of traditional intellectual property rights, but the protection of their own trade secrets is still in an irregular state, the cases of infringing trade secrets occur from time to time, and the rights are not guaranteed and relieved. Therefore, under the framework of TRIPS agreement, this paper hopes to provide practical help for the protection of business secrets through comparative research methods. There are four parts in this paper. The main contents are as follows: the first part: an overview of the basic theory of trade secrets. Starting with the reasons why trade secrets are protected, this paper sums up the definition of trade secrets in various countries and international organizations, and sums up the general characteristics of trade secrets. At the same time, the scope and classification criteria of trade secret are studied, especially the identification standard of customer list, which is a special trade secret. Part two: the protection and restriction of trade secret under TRIPS agreement. The second part takes the TRIPS Agreement as the core, introduces the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement on the protection of trade secrets and the recognition of its legal nature, and focuses on the constitutive requirements of trade secrets under the TRIPS Agreement: secrecy, value and reasonable measures. At the same time, it analyzes the limitation of trade secret protection to prevent abuse of power. The third part: the comparative study of the legal remedy system of trade secret. Based on the TRIPS Agreement, this part compares and analyzes the legal provisions and the legal relief system of the constitutive elements of violating trade secrets in the United States, Germany, Japan and China through the method of comparative analysis. At the same time, taking civil relief as the core, this paper probes deeply into the prohibition relief system of trade secret, and puts forward corresponding legislative suggestions to our country. The fourth part: the new topic of business secret protection-non-competition. This paper summarizes the current situation of the protection of commercial secrets in China, introduces the important role of non-compete agreement in preventing the loss of business secrets, and discusses the effective elements of the prohibition of competition, thus providing an effective way for enterprises to protect themselves.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.1;D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 潘冬,潘晴;TRIPs协议与相关知识产权国际公约比较[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年05期
2 赵哲锋;;中小企业商业秘密保护之法律探析[J];产业与科技论坛;2008年10期
3 郑成思;论知识产权的国际保护[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1997年03期
4 左剑君;;论企业商业秘密保护存在的问题及对策[J];鄂州大学学报;2008年01期
5 胡开忠;论无形财产权的体系及其在民法典中的地位和归属[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2001年01期
6 谢晓尧;商业秘密保护的国际最低标准——对TRIPS第39条的解析[J];国际贸易问题;2002年05期
7 徐朝贤;美、德、日商业秘密侵权救济制度的发展及借鉴[J];河北法学;2001年02期
8 于强;;竞业限制与企业商业秘密保护[J];湖北经济学院学报;2009年01期
9 罗立;;网络背景下的商业秘密保护[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年06期
10 陈海峰;;TRIPS框架下商业秘密权与劳动权冲突问题探讨[J];广西社会科学;2010年05期
，本文编号：2337664
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2337664.html
