中美轮胎特保案之法律思考
发布时间：2018-11-20 04:13
【摘要】：中美轮胎特保案是启动世界贸易组织争端解决程序解决的第一个针对中国产品的特别保障措施案件。该案也是美国对中国所发动的特保调查案件中规模最大的一个,在后金融危机时期,各国都处于经济重创后的恢复期,系统性的消费能力下降,正是在这样的大背景下奥巴马政府于2009年宣布对中国输美轮胎产品实施特别保障措施,具体做法为附加高额的关税。双方磋商未果后经WTO争端解决机构裁决,本文正是立足于特保机制的研究并对专家组的裁决进行分析。 本论文分为四个部分： 第一部分：轮胎特保案案情简介,简要回顾轮胎特保案的发生背景。另外还根据案件进展情况所制作了一个完整又简单清楚的案情发展回顾,在序列的最后部分列出了上诉机构对此案的最终核心意见。 第二部分：轮胎特保案法律问题解析,首先介绍了保障措施及特别保障措施,包括其渊源、性质、原则。然后将“中国式特保”特别作为一个方面进行解析。再次,将《保障措施协议》体系下的保障措施与《中国入世议定书》中的,“中国式特保”进行了一个较为全面的比较,并其后阐明了两者的关系及适用,力图明确全案的法律问题。 第三部分对专家组裁决的分析：以中国提交至WTO争端解决机构的申诉报告为基础,穿插了WTO法律解释之规则的分析,再就专家组案件争议焦点的裁决进行逐一评析、总结。 第四部分败诉的思考及对策：针对上一部分专家组的裁决,分析来自于中国自身的原因,并就未来应对“中国式特保”提出一些对策。
[Abstract]:The Sino-American tire protection case is the first special safeguard case against Chinese products to start the WTO dispute settlement process. This case is also the largest of the special protection investigations launched by the United States against China. In the post-financial crisis period, all countries are in the recovery period after the economic downfall, and the systemic spending power has declined. It is against this backdrop that the Obama administration announced in 2009 special safeguards for Chinese tire exports to the United States by imposing high tariffs. After the negotiation between the two sides failed, the WTO dispute settlement body ruled, this article is based on the research of the special safeguard mechanism and the analysis of the panel ruling. This thesis is divided into four parts: the first part: brief introduction of tire protection case, briefly review the background of tire protection case. In addition, a complete, simple and clear review of developments is made based on the progress of the case, and the final core opinion of the appellate body on the case is set out in the final part of the sequence. The second part: the analysis of the legal problems of tire special protection case. Firstly, it introduces the safeguard measures and special safeguard measures, including their origin, nature and principle. Then the "Chinese special safeguard" as a particular aspect of the analysis. Thirdly, the safeguard measures under the safeguards Agreement system are compared with those in the Protocol of China's accession to the WTO, and the relationship and application of the two measures are expounded. Try to clarify the legal issues of the whole case. The third part analyzes the panel decision: based on the complaint report submitted by China to the WTO dispute settlement body, the author intersperses the analysis of the rules of the WTO legal interpretation, and then evaluates the dispute focus of the panel case one by one, and summarizes the conclusion. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the reasons from China and puts forward some countermeasures to deal with the "Chinese special safeguard" in the future.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
本文编号：2343681
[Abstract]:The Sino-American tire protection case is the first special safeguard case against Chinese products to start the WTO dispute settlement process. This case is also the largest of the special protection investigations launched by the United States against China. In the post-financial crisis period, all countries are in the recovery period after the economic downfall, and the systemic spending power has declined. It is against this backdrop that the Obama administration announced in 2009 special safeguards for Chinese tire exports to the United States by imposing high tariffs. After the negotiation between the two sides failed, the WTO dispute settlement body ruled, this article is based on the research of the special safeguard mechanism and the analysis of the panel ruling. This thesis is divided into four parts: the first part: brief introduction of tire protection case, briefly review the background of tire protection case. In addition, a complete, simple and clear review of developments is made based on the progress of the case, and the final core opinion of the appellate body on the case is set out in the final part of the sequence. The second part: the analysis of the legal problems of tire special protection case. Firstly, it introduces the safeguard measures and special safeguard measures, including their origin, nature and principle. Then the "Chinese special safeguard" as a particular aspect of the analysis. Thirdly, the safeguard measures under the safeguards Agreement system are compared with those in the Protocol of China's accession to the WTO, and the relationship and application of the two measures are expounded. Try to clarify the legal issues of the whole case. The third part analyzes the panel decision: based on the complaint report submitted by China to the WTO dispute settlement body, the author intersperses the analysis of the rules of the WTO legal interpretation, and then evaluates the dispute focus of the panel case one by one, and summarizes the conclusion. In the fourth part, the author analyzes the reasons from China and puts forward some countermeasures to deal with the "Chinese special safeguard" in the future.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 刘新宇;试析美国对华第一起特殊保障措施案[J];当代法学;2003年09期
2 李娟;;“美国对华轮胎特保案”述评——以WTO相关规则为参照系[J];法商研究;2010年01期
3 曾令良;中国特定产品过渡性保障机制的有效性与合理性问题[J];法学评论;2005年05期
4 杨威;;从美国对华轮胎特保案浅析贸易保护主义[J];经济研究导刊;2010年34期
5 武立宏;;论特别保障措施涉及的法律问题[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2003年08期
6 贺小勇;;论近期中美贸易摩擦的法律对策[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2004年04期
7 黄志瑾;;中美轮胎特保案专家组报告评析——败诉的启示[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2011年02期
8 M.希尔夫,朱益宇,黄列;权力,规则和原则——哪一个是WTO/GATT的法律导向?[J];环球法津评论;2001年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 杨璐;论中美轮胎特保案中专家组的裁决[D];中国政法大学;2011年
2 董磊;对华特殊保障措施法律问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
，本文编号：2343681
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2343681.html
