新加坡XZ银行信用证拒付案分析
发布时间：2018-11-25 21:07
【摘要】：受益人提交的单据中,原产地证上的FOB价与发票显示的CIF价相等,开证行以此为不符点,拒付了受益人信用证项下款项。受益人不服并上诉,江苏高院根据UCP600第14条d款推定CIF和FOB为不同类型的数据,判决不符点不成立。论文从三个方面论质疑了江苏高院的结论,并结合本案对受益人、交单行和开证行提出了相关建议。
[Abstract]:In the documents submitted by the beneficiary, the FOB price on the certificate of origin was equal to the CIF price shown in the invoice, and the issuing bank rejected the payment under the beneficiary's letter of credit as a discrepancy. The beneficiary refused to appeal and the Jiangsu Supreme Court presumed CIF and FOB to be different types of data according to section 14d of UCP600. The paper questions the conclusion of Jiangsu High Court from three aspects, and puts forward some suggestions on beneficiary, single bank and issuing bank.
【作者单位】： 江苏工程职业技术学院;
【分类号】：D996.1
，
本文编号：2357372
[Abstract]:In the documents submitted by the beneficiary, the FOB price on the certificate of origin was equal to the CIF price shown in the invoice, and the issuing bank rejected the payment under the beneficiary's letter of credit as a discrepancy. The beneficiary refused to appeal and the Jiangsu Supreme Court presumed CIF and FOB to be different types of data according to section 14d of UCP600. The paper questions the conclusion of Jiangsu High Court from three aspects, and puts forward some suggestions on beneficiary, single bank and issuing bank.
【作者单位】： 江苏工程职业技术学院;
【分类号】：D996.1
，
本文编号：2357372
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2357372.html
