正常基线中海图的效力
发布时间：2018-12-10 17:42
【摘要】：有关正常基线中海图的效力问题,存在"海图低潮线优先"和"海图低潮线并不具备当然的法律拘束力"两种意见。基于《联合国海洋法公约》正常基线条款的立法史料以及现公约各文本措辞的梳理,并不能就何种意见更为可取得出清晰结论,但从公约上下文及国际司法实践来看,"海图低潮线并不具备当然的法律拘束力"的意见更占优势。具有法律拘束力的基线应当以实际的基线(低潮线)为准,海图上的领海基线并不是具有法律拘束力的基线,它是具有法律拘束力的正常基线的一种呈现形式,具备推定的准确度。但当有证据表明相关海岸或海洋地物的构造发生明显的重大变化时,这种推定就是不成立的,而应当以实际低潮线为准。
[Abstract]:There are two opinions on the validity of normal baselines: "low tide line priority" and "chart low tide line does not have natural legal binding force". Based on the legislative historical data of the normal baseline provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the current wording of each text of the Convention, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion as to which opinions can be more clearly concluded, but from the perspective of the context of the Convention and international judicial practice, "Chart low tide line does not have the legal binding force of course," the opinion is more dominant. The baselines with legal binding force shall be based on the actual baselines (low tide lines). The baselines of the territorial sea on charts are not legally binding baselines, but are a form of presentation of normal baselines with legal binding force, With presumptive accuracy. But when there is evidence that there is a significant change in the structure of the relevant coastal or marine features, this presumption is not true and should be based on the actual low tide line.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学重大项目(15JZD036);教育部人文社科研究规划项目(12YJA820104) 国家社会科学基金项目(12BFX129) 西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划重点项目
【分类号】：D993.5
本文编号：2370969
[Abstract]:There are two opinions on the validity of normal baselines: "low tide line priority" and "chart low tide line does not have natural legal binding force". Based on the legislative historical data of the normal baseline provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the current wording of each text of the Convention, it is not possible to draw a clear conclusion as to which opinions can be more clearly concluded, but from the perspective of the context of the Convention and international judicial practice, "Chart low tide line does not have the legal binding force of course," the opinion is more dominant. The baselines with legal binding force shall be based on the actual baselines (low tide lines). The baselines of the territorial sea on charts are not legally binding baselines, but are a form of presentation of normal baselines with legal binding force, With presumptive accuracy. But when there is evidence that there is a significant change in the structure of the relevant coastal or marine features, this presumption is not true and should be based on the actual low tide line.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学重大项目(15JZD036);教育部人文社科研究规划项目(12YJA820104) 国家社会科学基金项目(12BFX129) 西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划重点项目
【分类号】：D993.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 何学武;李令华;;我国及周边海洋国家领海基点和基线的基本状况[J];中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
2 李令华;;关于领海基点和基线的确定问题[J];中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
，本文编号：2370969
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2370969.html
