中外能源管道中的投资争端解决途径探析

发布时间：2018-12-11 19:41

【摘要】：在我国与周边的俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦、乌兹别克斯坦、土库曼斯坦、缅甸开展的能源管道合作中存有出现投资争端的可能性。现有的《能源宪章条约》、我国参与的区域性条约、缔结的涉外能源合作领域的双边条约和政府间协议却不能适用于解决此类投资争端。但是我国与上述五国签订的双边投资保护协定中包含投资争端解决的专门性规定,因此本文选择从双边投资保护协定的角度探讨该领域的投资争端解决途径。对于投资者母国与东道国之间的争端,本文认为通过政治或者外交途径解决是首选。因为我国与这五国之间保持着良好的外交传统,并且也确实存有多方面、多层次的外交谈判平台。如果通过政治或者外交途径不能解决此类争端,则可以尝试通过国际仲裁的方式解决。对于我国投资者与东道国之间的投资争端,本文建议选择ICSID仲裁的途径予以解决。虽然解决投资者与东道国之间的投资争端的途径很多,包括：通过友好协商解决、通过东道国国内行政或司法程序解决、通过设立个案仲裁庭解决等,但是通过ICSID解决更有利于最大限度的保护我国投资者的利益。通过ICSID仲裁的优势在于：ICSID框架内严谨的仲裁庭组成方式和成熟的仲裁程序规则可以为裁决的公正性提供强有力的保障；同时,ICSID的裁决解释、修改、撤销程序可以将争端方国内法院在执行ICSID裁决时的干预程度降至最低。若要将投资者与东道国之间的投资争端提交ICSID仲裁,必须满足ICSID管辖的三个必要条件：当事方必须满足一定的资质；争端必须具有投资性和法律性；当事人之间必须存在书面的将争端提交ICSID仲裁的协议。在中外能源管道领域,我国投资者与东道国之间的投资争端是能够满足上述条件,可以适用ICSID进行仲裁的。
[Abstract]:There is the possibility of investment disputes in China's cooperation with neighboring Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Myanmar on energy pipelines. The existing "Energy Charter Treaty", the regional treaties to which China is a party, bilateral treaties and intergovernmental agreements in the field of foreign energy cooperation cannot be applied to the settlement of such investment disputes. However, the bilateral investment protection agreements signed by China and the five countries mentioned above contain special provisions on the settlement of investment disputes. Therefore, this paper chooses to explore the approaches to the settlement of investment disputes in this field from the angle of bilateral investment protection agreements. For the disputes between home country and host country, this paper thinks that political or diplomatic solution is the first choice. Because China and these five countries maintain a good diplomatic tradition, and indeed there are many, multi-level diplomatic negotiation platform. If such disputes cannot be resolved politically or diplomatically, an attempt can be made to settle them through international arbitration. For the investment dispute between the investor and the host country, this paper suggests that ICSID arbitration should be chosen to settle the dispute. Although there are many ways to resolve investment disputes between investors and host countries, including through friendly negotiations, through domestic administrative or judicial proceedings of the host country, and through the establishment of arbitration tribunals in individual cases, etc. However, the ICSID solution is more conducive to the maximum protection of the interests of Chinese investors. The advantages of ICSID arbitration lie in: the rigorous constitution of arbitration tribunal and the mature rules of arbitration procedure within the framework of ICSID can provide a strong guarantee for the fairness of the award; At the same time, ICSID's ruling explains that amending and setting aside procedures can minimise the intervention of domestic courts of disputing parties in enforcing the ICSID ruling. In order to submit the investment dispute between the investor and the host country to ICSID arbitration, three necessary conditions of ICSID jurisdiction must be satisfied: the parties must satisfy certain qualifications, the dispute must be investment and legal; There must be a written agreement between the parties to submit the dispute to ICSID arbitration. In the field of domestic and foreign energy pipeline, the investment dispute between Chinese investors and host country can meet the above conditions and can be applied to ICSID arbitration.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4

【参考文献】