跨国代孕的国际私法问题研究
[Abstract]:Transnational surrogacy is becoming more and more popular in the world in an unofficial, semi-underground form, which has aroused the widespread concern of governments, the Hague Conference on Private International Law, human rights protection organizations and so on. Conflicts of laws exist in various countries on surrogacy related issues, coupled with the lack of uniform regulatory controls, and the uncertainty of the legality, effectiveness and enforcement of transnational surrogacy agreements. The protection of the rights and interests of the parties involved in transnational surrogacy, especially the uncertainty of the attribution of parental rights of surrogate children, and the uncertainty of legal status are becoming increasingly prominent. Existing cases and data show that China has been in the trend of transnational surrogacy. However, in mainland China, there is no stipulation on surrogacy in law, and there is also a problem that is not applicable to surrogacy. Moreover, the complexity of transnational surrogacy makes the judicial practice face difficulties. The problems related to transnational surrogacy need to be solved urgently. This paper will discuss the general path of uniform substantive law and conflict norm path to solve the problems of private international law. This paper also discusses the specific application of public order reservation in view of some controversial issues in the world. First of all, the path analysis of uniform substantive law, the analysis of the project of parenthood / surrogacy carried out by the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the practice of uniform substantive law carried out by the Group of experts of the European Parliament. Combined with the application of the Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in respect of Intercountry Adoption and the European Convention on Human Rights in practice, it is concluded that the problems related to intercountry surrogacy still need to be dealt with by conflict norms. Secondly, based on the special property of both property and person in transnational surrogacy agreement, this paper uses the theory of "division" to design conflict rules for contract items and parental matters respectively. In view of the status gap between willing parents and surrogate mothers in the process of conclusion and implementation of transnational surrogacy agreements, combined with the current situation of legislation on the validity and enforcement of surrogacy agreements in many countries and the new trend of paying attention to substantive justice in private international law. It draws the conclusion that the principle of protecting the legal interests of the weak party, the theory of "division" and the principle of autonomy of will have applicability in the transnational surrogacy contract, and analyzes the concrete application scheme; In view of the damage to the basic rights and interests of surrogate children caused by the parental right of "lameness", the principle of "protecting the best interests of the child" is embodied in the existing international treaties, jurisprudence and relevant conflict norms of various countries. Ensure that the applicable law that best protects the interests of the child is applied by adding new or applicable associative points. Finally, according to the trend of restriction and application of the reservation system of public order, the pursuit of substantive fairness in private international law and the uncertainty of public order itself, from the angle of balancing national and individual interests, Aiming at the exploitation and commercialization of surrogate mothers, this paper discusses the application of international public order and the relationship between the reservation of public order and domestic public law. In order to avoid the influence of the abuse of public order reservation system on surrogate children and same-sex willing parents, this paper mainly discusses the application of the "objective theory" which emphasizes the result and justice and the protection of the best interests of the child as well as the concrete application of the public order reservation system.
【学位授予单位】:东南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D997.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒋生元;;“国际代孕”争议多[J];决策与信息;2015年02期
2 杨立民;;国际私法“弱者保护原则”的实现方式评析——以我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》为中心[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2014年06期
3 王萍;;代孕法律的比较考察与技术分析[J];法治研究;2014年06期
4 任巍;王倩;;我国代孕的合法化及其边界研究[J];河北法学;2014年02期
5 任际;;国际私法中公共秩序保留的综合要素及适用趋势[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年06期
6 吴国平;;“完全代孕”协议的效力及其法律规制[J];上海政法学院学报(法治论丛);2013年04期
7 于晶;;代孕技术合理使用之探究[J];河北法学;2013年01期
8 李斌;;代孕:在法理与伦理之间——兼及公序良俗原则的社会变迁[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2010年02期
9 刘萃;张卓娅;;商业性代孕合同性质探究[J];学理论;2010年10期
10 罗满景;;中国代孕制度之立法重构——以无偿的完全代孕为对象[J];时代法学;2009年04期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 张丽珍;冲突法的正义问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2014年
2 刘艳娜;国际私法的适当主权论[D];吉林大学;2012年
3 康茜;代孕关系的法律调整问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 齐玲星;跨国代孕亲子关系确定问题研究[D];浙江工商大学;2015年
2 王琴;代孕亲子关系认定研究[D];扬州大学;2014年
3 王卫华;论代孕的正当性基础及法律规制[D];苏州大学;2014年
4 刘凌云;论公共秩序保留在涉外婚姻中的适用[D];西南政法大学;2013年
5 张继海;论国际私法中的公共秩序保留[D];大连海事大学;2010年
6 杨敏;论国际私法对弱者利益的保护[D];贵州大学;2008年
7 杨军;代孕法律问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
8 秦琳;论国际私法上的弱方当事人问题[D];西南政法大学;2007年
9 罗满景;代孕合同合法性研究[D];湖南师范大学;2007年
10 翟婷;代孕正当性法理学研究[D];山东大学;2007年
,本文编号:2377802
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2377802.html