可口可乐收购汇源的反垄断法律问题研究
发布时间：2018-12-30 14:44
【摘要】：《反垄断法》实施后，商务部加大了对外资企业并购内资企业的审查力度，可口可乐收购汇源成为自该法实施以来未被审查通过的第一案。 可口可乐公司并不是自己发起对汇源的收购，而是通过其全资子公司进行收购，收购汇源全部股权。根据我国相关法律规定，达到一定条件的并购必须向商务部进行申报，而此次可口可乐对汇源的收购就达到了法律规定的要求。在收到申报材料后，商务部对此案正式开始立案审查。但在经过初步审查后，商务部发现其并未完全按照法律的要求提供充足的材料，遂要求其提供相应的修改方案。虽然可口可乐按照要求对材料进行了补充修改后仍未能达到商务部许可的标准，最终这次在策划中的收购还是以失败告终，成为首例未被商务部审核通过的案例。 文章主要以我国跨国并购反垄断法律体系框架的构建为最终目的来分析此案，通过全面、深入的分析达到笔者期望的目标。文章包含四个部分主要内容： 第一部分介绍案件基本情况，商务部对于该案是如何进行审查的，最终导致商务部否决这次并购的理由是什么。主要论述“可口可乐收购汇源案”的整个过程、商务部的审查程序以及做出的裁决。 第二部分深入分析了商务部是根据什么禁止可口可乐收购汇源的，其具体的反垄断依据进是什么。主要从法律依据和事实依据两个方面入手，深层次分析可口可乐收购汇源最终被禁止的反垄断理由。 第三部分对可口可乐收购汇源案所反映的法律焦点问题结合相关理论知识进行分析，深入评析商务部对本次收购双方各自产品在市场占有的份额、传导效应在本案中的使用情况、搭售对收购的影响、收购是否会挤压其他企业的生存空间这些问题。 第四部分对于我国跨国并购反垄断法律制度还可以做出哪些完善提出构想。在这一部分，笔者具体分析了本案所反映出实体与程序方面我国反垄断审查实制度规定的不足，建议借鉴欧美立法及实践经验，来完善我国跨国并购反垄断法律制度，笔者期望能通过自己的努力为我国跨国并购反垄断问题的研究做出些许贡献。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law, the Ministry of Commerce has stepped up the examination of foreign-funded enterprises' mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises, and Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan has become the first case that has not been examined and passed since the implementation of the law. Coca-Cola is not launching its own acquisition of Huiyuan, but through its wholly owned subsidiary to acquire a full stake in Huiyuan. According to the relevant laws of our country, mergers and acquisitions that meet certain conditions must be declared to the Ministry of Commerce, and the Coca-Cola acquisition of Huiyuan has met the requirements of the law. After receiving the declaration materials, the Ministry of Commerce formally began to file the case for examination. However, after preliminary examination, the Ministry of Commerce found that it did not provide sufficient materials in accordance with the requirements of the law, and requested it to provide the corresponding amendment plan. Although Coke failed to meet the MOFCOM's approval criteria after making the required supplementary changes, the planned acquisition ended in failure and became the first case not approved by the ministry. This paper analyzes the case with the final purpose of constructing the legal framework of transnational merger and acquisition in China, and achieves the desired goal through comprehensive and in-depth analysis. The article includes four main parts: the first part introduces the basic situation of the case, how the MOFCOM reviews the case, and what is the reason why the MOFCOM vetoed the merger and acquisition. This paper mainly discusses the whole process of the "Coca Cola acquisition of Huiyuan case", the examination procedure and the ruling made by the Ministry of Commerce. The second part deeply analyzes what the Ministry of Commerce forbids Coca Cola to buy Huiyuan and what its antitrust basis is. Starting from the legal basis and the factual basis, the paper deeply analyzes the antitrust reasons why Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan was finally prohibited. The third part analyzes the legal focus issues reflected in the case of Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan and analyzes the respective market share of the respective products of the Ministry of Commerce. The use of conduction effect in this case, the effect of tying on the acquisition, and whether the acquisition will squeeze the living space of other enterprises. The fourth part puts forward some ideas about how to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of cross-border M & A in our country. In this part, the author concretely analyzes the deficiency of the actual anti-monopoly examination system in the aspect of entity and procedure, and suggests to use European and American legislation and practical experience for reference to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of transnational M & A in our country. The author hopes to make some contributions to the study of anti-monopoly problem of cross-border M & A in China through his own efforts.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
本文编号：2395720
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the Anti-monopoly Law, the Ministry of Commerce has stepped up the examination of foreign-funded enterprises' mergers and acquisitions of domestic enterprises, and Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan has become the first case that has not been examined and passed since the implementation of the law. Coca-Cola is not launching its own acquisition of Huiyuan, but through its wholly owned subsidiary to acquire a full stake in Huiyuan. According to the relevant laws of our country, mergers and acquisitions that meet certain conditions must be declared to the Ministry of Commerce, and the Coca-Cola acquisition of Huiyuan has met the requirements of the law. After receiving the declaration materials, the Ministry of Commerce formally began to file the case for examination. However, after preliminary examination, the Ministry of Commerce found that it did not provide sufficient materials in accordance with the requirements of the law, and requested it to provide the corresponding amendment plan. Although Coke failed to meet the MOFCOM's approval criteria after making the required supplementary changes, the planned acquisition ended in failure and became the first case not approved by the ministry. This paper analyzes the case with the final purpose of constructing the legal framework of transnational merger and acquisition in China, and achieves the desired goal through comprehensive and in-depth analysis. The article includes four main parts: the first part introduces the basic situation of the case, how the MOFCOM reviews the case, and what is the reason why the MOFCOM vetoed the merger and acquisition. This paper mainly discusses the whole process of the "Coca Cola acquisition of Huiyuan case", the examination procedure and the ruling made by the Ministry of Commerce. The second part deeply analyzes what the Ministry of Commerce forbids Coca Cola to buy Huiyuan and what its antitrust basis is. Starting from the legal basis and the factual basis, the paper deeply analyzes the antitrust reasons why Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan was finally prohibited. The third part analyzes the legal focus issues reflected in the case of Coca-Cola 's acquisition of Huiyuan and analyzes the respective market share of the respective products of the Ministry of Commerce. The use of conduction effect in this case, the effect of tying on the acquisition, and whether the acquisition will squeeze the living space of other enterprises. The fourth part puts forward some ideas about how to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of cross-border M & A in our country. In this part, the author concretely analyzes the deficiency of the actual anti-monopoly examination system in the aspect of entity and procedure, and suggests to use European and American legislation and practical experience for reference to perfect the anti-monopoly legal system of transnational M & A in our country. The author hopes to make some contributions to the study of anti-monopoly problem of cross-border M & A in China through his own efforts.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 崔本强;;外资并购对我国的影响及法律对策[J];商业研究;2008年10期
2 韩立余;欧盟合并控制法的根本变革[J];当代法学;2005年02期
3 潘志成;;析商务部禁止可口可乐收购汇源的相关理由[J];法学;2009年07期
4 商梦莹;;反垄断法中相关市场界定问题研究[J];法制与社会;2009年25期
5 张世国;;可口可乐收购汇源案的相关“规制”[J];中国外资;2008年10期
6 孙晋;翟孟;;对我国外资并购的反垄断法思考——以美国可口可乐收购我国汇源为例[J];新疆大学学报(哲学人文社会科学版);2009年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 林飞翔;中国反垄断相关市场的界定研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
，本文编号：2395720
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2395720.html
