论不当得利自体法

发布时间：2019-01-05 13:41

【摘要】：英美学者的"不当得利自体法"理论,主张涉外不当得利之债应由其自体法支配。在不同的情势下,自体法可以是原因合同关系准据法、不动产所在地法、得利地法或不当因素产生地法。虽然学界对上述观点褒贬不一,但其对我国不当得利冲突立法有着现实的借鉴意义:原因合同关系准据法主义不仅与不当得利制度的地位与作用相匹配,而且可以解决因识别差异导致的准据法偏差问题;不动产所在地法若随着物权冲突规则的发展而扩展至与动产有关的不当得利,则亦可避免因识别差异导致的准据法偏差;而至于得利地法,则已经在大陆法系国家的早期立法中得到体现。此外,鉴于不当得利制度的核心是得利原因之不正当,故将"不当得利发生地"理解为"不当因素产生地",并作为指引不当得利准据法的连结点之一,亦可为我国立法所用。
[Abstract]:According to the theory of "unjust enrichment autologous method", British and American scholars hold that the debt of improper enrichment should be controlled by its own law. In different situations, the autologous law may be the law applicable to the contractual relationship of cause, the law of the location of immovable property, the law of enrichment or the law of the place where improper factors arise. Although the academic circles have different opinions on the above views, they have practical significance for reference to the legislation of improper enrichment conflict in our country: the doctrine of applicable law of reason contract relation not only matches the position and function of improper enrichment system, Moreover, it can solve the problem of the deviation of the applicable method caused by the difference of identification. If the law of the location of immovable property extends to the improper enrichment related to movable property with the development of the rules of conflict of rem, it can also avoid the deviation of applicable law caused by the difference of identification. As for the law of enrichment, it has been embodied in the early legislation of civil law countries. In addition, since the core of the unjust enrichment system is the improper cause of enrichment, it can be used in our legislation to interpret the "place of improper enrichment" as "the place where improper factors are produced" and to act as one of the connecting points to guide the applicable law of improper enrichment.
【作者单位】：浙江大学宁波理工学院;浙江大学光华法学院;
【分类号】：D997

【二级参考文献】