论公捕之禁止：法理论证与规则建议
发布时间：2019-01-15 21:10
【摘要】：联合国《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第14条第2款规定：凡受刑事控告者,在未依法证实有罪之前,应有权被视为无罪。但从现在各地密集举行的“公捕大会”等,可以看出无罪推定的法律意识在我国尚未深入人心。犯罪嫌疑人虽然在法律上被认为是无罪的,但在实践中却往往是被认为有罪的。公开批捕,就等于在相当开放的群体范围内宣布其构成犯罪,专横而明确地给犯罪嫌疑人带上了“有罪”的烙印,同时他们的人格尊严等人身权利也得不到尊重和保护。究其原因,主要是犯罪嫌疑人在刑事诉讼中的法律身份和诉讼地位决定的,故在分析和探讨禁止公捕的法理基础上,对公民被公捕如何做权利救济提出相应的规则建议,具有很大的现实指导意义。
[Abstract]:Article 14, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights of the United Nations states that anyone accused of a criminal offence shall have the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty by law. However, we can see that the legal consciousness of presumption of innocence has not been deeply accepted in our country. Although suspects are considered innocent in law, they are often considered guilty in practice. Public arrest is tantamount to declaring that it constitutes a crime within a fairly open group, arbitrarily and explicitly bearing the mark of "guilt" on the suspects, and at the same time, their personal rights such as human dignity cannot be respected and protected. The reasons are mainly determined by the legal status and status of criminal suspects in criminal proceedings. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing and discussing the legal principle of prohibiting public arrests, the author puts forward corresponding rules and suggestions on how citizens can do right relief by public arrest. It has great practical significance.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.9
本文编号：2409123
[Abstract]:Article 14, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights of the United Nations states that anyone accused of a criminal offence shall have the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty by law. However, we can see that the legal consciousness of presumption of innocence has not been deeply accepted in our country. Although suspects are considered innocent in law, they are often considered guilty in practice. Public arrest is tantamount to declaring that it constitutes a crime within a fairly open group, arbitrarily and explicitly bearing the mark of "guilt" on the suspects, and at the same time, their personal rights such as human dignity cannot be respected and protected. The reasons are mainly determined by the legal status and status of criminal suspects in criminal proceedings. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing and discussing the legal principle of prohibiting public arrests, the author puts forward corresponding rules and suggestions on how citizens can do right relief by public arrest. It has great practical significance.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈卫东,刘计划;论犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼主体地位[J];法商研究;2003年03期
2 申君贵;臧艳华;;公捕大会应依法禁止[J];法学;2007年02期
3 周炜;;违法行为示众性公开处理不具有正当性——从福田警方公开处理涉黄人员说开去[J];法制与社会;2007年01期
4 陈果;王新清;;情、理、法视野中的示众行为[J];求索;2008年01期
5 于秀艳;英国新闻自由与藐视法庭之间的界线[J];人民司法;1999年02期
6 韩克芳;;反酷刑政策与罪犯人权保障[J];法学论坛;2007年02期
7 胡亚球;张熠;;无罪推定的规则及其正当性论述——以新闻舆论报道的规范化为视角[J];社会科学家;2008年12期
8 金文彤;;试论无罪推定原则[J];铁道警官高等专科学校学报;2008年06期
9 王久良;;人权与反酷刑[J];齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报;2008年01期
10 邹思平;关于媒体犯罪案件报道的思考[J];云南警官学院学报;2004年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张小海;无罪推定权利论[D];中国政法大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 王生胜;刑事法官与传媒关系研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
2 杨晓锋;论无罪推定下犯罪嫌疑人的人身权利及救济[D];苏州大学;2009年
3 周奕;无罪推定原则立法比较研究[D];苏州大学;2010年
，本文编号：2409123
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2409123.html
