外空军事化的法律学说评析

发布时间：2019-02-18 08:48

【摘要】：外空法对外空军事化这一概念没有明确界定,因此国际社会对外空军事化存在不同的解读,并形成了相应的法律学说。禁止外空军事化说认为,人类利用外空应出于和平目的,而一切形式的外空军事化都是与和平目的相违背的。允许外空军事化学说认为不仅被动的外空军事化是正当的,而且主动的外空武器化也是正当的。部分禁止外空军事化学说则反对毫无限制的外空武器化,但认可在一定范围内的外空军事化利用。第一种学说过于理想主义而且与现行法律并不相符;第二种学说是霸权主义和冒险主义的体现,将导致外空军备竞赛,并可能带来众多恶果;第三种观点更趋现实主义,但需要凝聚共识,以构筑可操作的法律机制。面对由安全困境所导致的军备竞赛的可能性,必须通过国际法来缓解困境,寻求外层空间的共同安全。
[Abstract]:The concept of outer space militarization is not clearly defined in outer space law, so the international community has different interpretations of outer space militarization and forms the corresponding legal doctrine. The theory of banning the militarization of outer space holds that the use of outer space by mankind should be for peaceful purposes, and all forms of militarization of outer space are contrary to peaceful purposes. The doctrine of allowing the militarization of outer space is justified not only by passive militarization of outer space, but also by active weaponization of outer space. Part of the theory of banning the militarization of outer space opposes the weaponization of outer space without restriction, but accepts the militarization of outer space to a certain extent. The first doctrine is too idealistic and inconsistent with existing laws; the second is a manifestation of hegemonism and adventurism, which will lead to an arms race in outer space and may have many adverse consequences; The third view is more realistic, but requires consensus to build an operational legal mechanism. In the face of the possibility of an arms race caused by security dilemmas, the dilemma must be alleviated through international law and the common security of outer space must be pursued.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨工业大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部2008年度“国际法治与法学理论研究项目‘外空非武器化的发展构建’”(08SFB5027)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D999.1

【参考文献】