中国南沙群岛主权的国际法论证
发布时间：2019-03-18 11:05
【摘要】：南沙群岛自古以来就是中国的神圣领土。中国南沙群岛的主权不仅是基于历史事实的先占,而且具有国际法上的依据,包括国际条约、国际习惯法、法律原则、司法判例。有关双边条约和多边条约确立了中国对南沙群岛的主权,中国主张的"历史性权利"与《联合国海洋法公约》的规定是相容的;根据国际社会公认的禁反言原则,南沙群岛其他争端国都曾承认中国对南沙群岛的主权;时际法等国际法一般法律原则和相关司法判例也支持中国对南沙群岛的主权。越南、菲律宾等国所主张的继承说、邻接权和有效控制说在国际法上都没有法理依据。
[Abstract]:Nansha Islands has been the sacred territory of China since ancient times. The sovereignty of Nansha Islands in China is not only preemption based on historical facts, but also based on international law, including international treaties, international customary law, legal principles and judicial jurisprudence. The relevant bilateral and multilateral treaties have established China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands, and the "historic rights" advocated by China are compatible with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; According to the principle of proscription accepted by the international community, other disputing countries of the Nansha Islands have recognized China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands, and the general legal principles of international law, such as inter-temporal law and relevant judicial jurisprudence, have also supported China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands. The succession claims of Vietnam, Philippines and other countries have no legal basis in international law, such as adjacency right and effective control.
【作者单位】： 中国人民武装警察部队学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“海警制度研究”(14GJ003——265)
【分类号】：D993.5
[Abstract]:Nansha Islands has been the sacred territory of China since ancient times. The sovereignty of Nansha Islands in China is not only preemption based on historical facts, but also based on international law, including international treaties, international customary law, legal principles and judicial jurisprudence. The relevant bilateral and multilateral treaties have established China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands, and the "historic rights" advocated by China are compatible with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; According to the principle of proscription accepted by the international community, other disputing countries of the Nansha Islands have recognized China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands, and the general legal principles of international law, such as inter-temporal law and relevant judicial jurisprudence, have also supported China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands. The succession claims of Vietnam, Philippines and other countries have no legal basis in international law, such as adjacency right and effective control.
【作者单位】： 中国人民武装警察部队学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“海警制度研究”(14GJ003——265)
【分类号】：D993.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蔺运珍;;论马克思国际法思想的产生和演进[J];中国石油大学胜利学院学报;2009年02期
2 刘杰花;梁静娴;;和谐世界的国际法基础[J];法制与社会;2010年22期
3 周忠海;国际法史与国际法的发展[J];政法论坛;1994年05期
4 万霞;回顾与展望——改革开放20年国际法在中国的发展[J];外交学院学报;1999年02期
5 江虹;;国际法与国内法关系的思考[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2014年03期
6 李林芮;;论国际法与国内法的关系[J];大众商务;2010年08期
7 秦晓程;从国际法看“撞机事件”是非[J];w挛胖芸，
本文编号：2442804
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2442804.html
