中欧涉外侵权冲突法适用比较研究
发布时间：2019-03-24 17:06
【摘要】：随着2010年10月28日我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》的通过，国际私法体系中涉外侵权领域的法律适用法又一次被学界瞩目。《涉外民事关系法律适用法》主要用第六章的篇幅将有关涉外侵权的法律条文纳入其中，这一章不仅吸纳了涉外侵权的一般规则，还纳入了一些特殊规则的适用。处于世界范围内首屈一指的区域性组织欧盟也曾在2007年颁布了一部类似的法律，即《罗马条例II》。《罗马条例II》是欧盟立法者在国际私法领域积累的大量先进的法律理念和立法技术的成果。这两部法律是目前中国与欧盟涉外侵权领域的法律适用法。 从中国和欧盟涉外侵权领域的法律冲突入手，，结合个案研究对中国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》与欧盟《罗马条例II》这两部涉外侵权冲突法的共有规则及其相应法条进行规范分析和比较分析得出差异，进一步对这些差异的产生原因进行深入的剖析和阐明，并进行相应的价值判断和法律思考，得到我国法律可以借鉴之处，最终实现帮助完善我国涉外法律冲突法不足之处的目的，为我国涉外侵权领域法律的发展做出贡献。
[Abstract]:With the adoption of the Law applicable to Foreign Civil Relations on 28 October 2010, The applicable law in the field of foreign tort in the system of private international law has once again attracted the attention of the academic circles. The Law on the Application of Law concerning Foreign Civil Relations mainly includes the legal provisions on foreign tort in the sixth chapter. This chapter not only absorbs the general rules of foreign infringement, but also includes the application of some special rules. The European Union, the world's leading regional organization, enacted a similar law in 2007. Rome Regulation II. Rome Regulation II is the result of a large number of advanced legal ideas and legislative techniques accumulated by EU legislators in the field of private international law. These two laws are the applicable laws in the field of foreign-related infringement between China and the European Union. Starting with the conflict of laws in the field of foreign-related infringement between China and the European Union, Combining with the case study, this paper makes a normative and comparative analysis of the common rules of the two foreign-related tort conflict laws, the applicable Law of the Law on Civil Relations concerning Foreign Affairs and the European Union Regulation II, and their corresponding laws and regulations, and draws a conclusion of the differences between the two laws. The causes of these differences are further analyzed and clarified, and the corresponding value judgment and legal thinking are carried out, which can be used for reference by the law of our country. Finally realize the purpose of helping to perfect the deficiency of the law of conflict of laws concerning foreign affairs, and make contribution to the development of the law of the field of infringement concerning foreign affairs in our country.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997
本文编号：2446518
[Abstract]:With the adoption of the Law applicable to Foreign Civil Relations on 28 October 2010, The applicable law in the field of foreign tort in the system of private international law has once again attracted the attention of the academic circles. The Law on the Application of Law concerning Foreign Civil Relations mainly includes the legal provisions on foreign tort in the sixth chapter. This chapter not only absorbs the general rules of foreign infringement, but also includes the application of some special rules. The European Union, the world's leading regional organization, enacted a similar law in 2007. Rome Regulation II. Rome Regulation II is the result of a large number of advanced legal ideas and legislative techniques accumulated by EU legislators in the field of private international law. These two laws are the applicable laws in the field of foreign-related infringement between China and the European Union. Starting with the conflict of laws in the field of foreign-related infringement between China and the European Union, Combining with the case study, this paper makes a normative and comparative analysis of the common rules of the two foreign-related tort conflict laws, the applicable Law of the Law on Civil Relations concerning Foreign Affairs and the European Union Regulation II, and their corresponding laws and regulations, and draws a conclusion of the differences between the two laws. The causes of these differences are further analyzed and clarified, and the corresponding value judgment and legal thinking are carried out, which can be used for reference by the law of our country. Finally realize the purpose of helping to perfect the deficiency of the law of conflict of laws concerning foreign affairs, and make contribution to the development of the law of the field of infringement concerning foreign affairs in our country.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 宋晓;;双重可诉规则:进退之际[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年01期
2 董海洲;;从“身份”到“场所”——属人法连结点的历史与发展[J];法学家;2010年01期
3 王秀转;;欧盟《非合同之债的法律适用条例》之规则批判[J];河北法学;2009年12期
4 肖永平;崔相龙;;欧盟《非合同之债法律适用条例》评析[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期
5 程汉大;英国宪政传统的历史成因[J];法制与社会发展;2005年01期
6 李双元,邓杰,熊之才;国际社会本位的理念与法院地法适用的合理限制[J];武汉大学学报(社会科学版);2001年05期
7 马瑞丽;涉外侵权行为法律适用的发展趋势[J];学习论坛;2005年11期
本文编号：2446518
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2446518.html
