《联合国国际货物买卖合同公约》宣告合同无效制度研究
[Abstract]:The contract annulment system of the United Nations Convention on the contract for International Sale of goods (hereinafter referred to as the Convention) is one of the important relief measures for the parties to the contract of international sale of goods. This system plays a very important role in protecting the legal rights and interests of the parties and promoting the smooth and effective operation of the international contract for the sale of goods. Annulment of contract annulment is a severe relief method, once established, it will lead to the elimination and restitution of the contract, which has a great impact on the rights of the parties. According to the concept of abiding by the contract, the parties to the contract should fulfill their obligations in strict accordance with the agreement. However, in the practice of international trade, if there is a fundamental breach of contract by one party and the purpose of the contract cannot be realized, the injured party is directly deprived of what the injured party is entitled to expect under the contract. From a fair point of view, the injured party should be allowed the right to choose to get out of the bondage of the contract. In addition, due to the high cost of the performance of the international contract for the sale of goods, the defaulting party annulled the contract so as to cancel the contract instead of requiring the defaulting party to continue to perform the contract in practice, which is also beneficial to the defaulting party. The correct understanding and understanding of the contract annulment system is of great significance to the relief law of breach of contract and the whole trade law in international trade, and it is also of great significance to perfect the corresponding legal rescission of contract in our country's law. The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale and Sale of goods, as a uniform law regulating international trade in goods, its annulment system combines the two legal systems, such as the legal rescission of contracts and the system of breach of contract. This article takes the convention annulment system as the object, uses the continental law, the common law and the convention relevant rule combs, analyzes and compares, strives to clarify the convention annulment contract annulment system general rule. In order to achieve this purpose, this article uses the article comparison method and the case analysis method, pays attention to the normative analysis of the legal rules, at the same time, carries on the corroboration with the related case. The article is divided into five parts: the first part briefly describes the basic background of the United Nations Convention on International sales contracts and the basic contents of the annulment system of contract annulment, and points out the topic and research significance of this paper. The second part introduces the three causes of contract annulment from the perspective of comparative law, namely, fundamental breach of contract, the system of grace period for delay of performance, the source of expected fundamental breach of contract and the corresponding provisions of the Convention. As well as the special case of partial delivery contract applicable to annulment of contract annulment of different circumstances. The third part of the exercise of the right to declare a contract invalid procedures and restrictions. The fourth part analyzes the legal effect of the contract annulment system. The fifth part summarizes the corresponding system of rescission of contract in our country and analyzes the existing problems, and puts forward some suggestions for reference according to the system of annulment of contract in accordance with the Convention. Finally, in the conclusion part, the author reviews the gradual deepening of the system of annulment of contract in the process of writing, and points out the writing purpose and research focus of the article again.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D923.6;D996.1;D997.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩文江;;浅析CISG的预期违约制度[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2009年10期
2 吴晓燕;;试析国际货物买卖合同与国内货物买卖合同之比较——以CISG和中国合同法为例[J];法制与社会;2009年09期
3 王增岩;;论分批交货合同中的宣告无效制度——《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》第73条评析[J];法制与社会;2010年07期
4 蔡春生;国际货物买卖中预期违约和分批交货合同违约的救济方法[J];国际贸易问题;1991年02期
5 蔡春生;试论《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》关于实际履行的规定[J];国际贸易问题;1991年09期
6 韩世远;根本违约论[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1999年04期
7 马克·R.舒尔曼;;商人、法律人与法治(英文)[J];武大国际法评论;2009年02期
8 王利明;论根本违约与合同解除的关系[J];中国法学;1995年03期
9 张用江,汪少鹏;关于合同解除的几个问题[J];中国法学;1998年03期
10 崔建远;解除权问题的疑问与释答(上篇)[J];政治与法律;2005年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 郝磊;合同解除权制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 李江;合同解除权制度的比较法研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
2 徐光新;论CISG中的预期违约制度及对中国的借鉴[D];安徽大学;2007年
3 裴媛;《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》中的预期违约制度研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
,本文编号:2453221
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2453221.html