国际法基本原则的迷失:动因与出路

发布时间：2019-04-03 21:06

【摘要】：中国国际法理论界和实践界长期高度重视国际法基本原则的地位和作用,一些国外的学者也曾对此进行专门阐述。然而,在国际法的实践、特别是国际司法实践中,国际法的基本原则却很少被专门提及,处于一种迷失状态。通过国际法的基本原则与《国际法院规约》规定的"一般法律原则"的对比,可以看出国际法基本原则存在着在法律渊源的列表中未能被正式规定的缺憾;通过对国际法的基本原则与近期被高度重视的"强行法"的比较,可以发现国际法基本原则的纯政治血统是其在国际法整体上趋向专业化、技术化进程中被边缘化的主要原因。道德驱动的政治决议与技术掩盖的利益导向进行博弈,后者取得了优势。然而,从未来出路看,具有权衡特征的国际法基本原则在当代国际法体系中具有指引、协调、整合的作用,满足国际法未来健康发展进程的需求,故而应赋予和提升国际法基本原则的地位,中国作为国际法的后发国家应继续高度重视并倡导国际法的基本原则。
[Abstract]:The theoretical and practical circles of international law in China attach great importance to the status and function of the basic principles of international law for a long time, and some foreign scholars have expounded it specially. However, in the practice of international law, especially in the practice of international justice, the basic principles of international law are seldom mentioned and are in a state of loss. Through the comparison between the basic principles of international law and the "general principles of law" stipulated in the Statute of the International Court of Justice, it can be seen that the basic principles of international law have the defect that they have not been formally stipulated in the list of sources of law; Through the comparison between the basic principles of international law and the recent "jus cogens", it can be found that the pure political origin of the basic principles of international law is the main cause of its tendency towards specialization and marginalization in the process of technicalization of international law as a whole. Moral-driven political decisions play with technology-masked interest-oriented, the latter gaining an advantage. However, from the perspective of the way forward, the fundamental principles of international law, characterized by trade-offs, play a guiding, coordinating and integrated role in the contemporary system of international law in order to meet the needs of the future healthy development of international law, Therefore, we should give and promote the status of the basic principles of international law. China, as a latecomer of international law, should continue to attach great importance to and advocate the basic principles of international law.
【作者单位】： 2011计划·司法文明协同创新中心;吉林大学法学院;武汉大学国际法研究所;吉林大学理论法学研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重点研究基地项目“提升中国话语权与国际法律制度变革”(16JJD820010)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D99

【相似文献】