国际商事仲裁裁决司法审查制度研究
[Abstract]:International commercial arbitration means that the parties to the dispute refer the commercial dispute to the agreed arbitration tribunal, and the arbitration tribunal shall make a binding decision to the parties. Compared with the transnational civil action, the international commercial arbitration has the advantages of high efficiency, confidentiality, rapidness, easy implementation and the like, and is favored by most international commercial subjects, and the number of cases submitted to the international commercial arbitration every year is high. International commercial arbitration has a very clear meaning of self-government. However, if the international commercial arbitration award is to be enforced, it must meet the requirements of a certain substantive law and procedural law. Both the international convention and the national legislative level provide for the recognition and enforcement of the international commercial arbitration award. When a party applies for enforcement of an international commercial arbitration award to a court of a State, national courts generally conduct judicial review of the legality of the entity of the commercial arbitration award and the legality of the procedure in accordance with its national legislation. The reason is that, on the one hand, in the event of international commercial arbitration, the autonomy of the parties acting as the subject of private law is subject to the restriction of the law; on the other hand, since the enforcement of the international commercial arbitration award is often involved in the property in the country and in the country, The judicial review of the international commercial arbitration award is also the need for the State to exercise judicial sovereignty. Therefore, the author has made a textual research on the judicial review system of the international commercial arbitration award, and summarized the relevant legislation in China and the problems encountered in the judicial practice in recent years, and put forward some suggestions. In particular, the contents of this paper are divided into four parts.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 熊瑛子;;国际体育仲裁中越权裁决的司法审查[J];苏州大学学报(法学版);2016年04期
2 肖蓓;;《纽约公约》背景下我国对外国仲裁裁决承认及执行的实证研究[J];现代法学;2016年03期
3 于喜富;;论争议可仲裁性司法审查之启动程序[J];法学评论;2016年03期
4 金鑫;;论法国法上仲裁庭否认自身管辖权的仲裁裁决——以Abela案为例[J];法学评论;2015年02期
5 何其生;;国际商事仲裁司法审查中的公共政策[J];中国社会科学;2014年07期
6 毛海波;;刍议国际商事仲裁裁决司法监督的最新趋势——以英国达纳案件为切入[J];仲裁研究;2013年02期
7 杨弘磊;;中国内地法院《纽约公约》项下外国仲裁裁决司法审查之新近实践述评[J];武大国际法评论;2012年02期
8 石现明;;国际商事仲裁当事人扩大司法审查范围之协议及其效力探析[J];北京交通大学学报(社会科学版);2012年01期
9 谢新胜;;国际商事仲裁裁决撤销制度“废弃论”之批判[J];法商研究;2010年05期
10 卞建林;;我国司法权威的缺失与树立[J];法学论坛;2010年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 宋家法;国际商事仲裁司法审查制度研究[D];武汉大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 李晨;国际商事仲裁管辖权的司法审查研究[D];复旦大学;2013年
2 徐飞云;论法院对国际商事仲裁裁决程序性瑕疵的司法审查[D];南京大学;2012年
3 张伟;论国际商事仲裁裁决的司法审查[D];山东大学;2007年
,本文编号:2456307
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2456307.html