当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

国际法视野下的知识产权与人权

发布时间:2019-04-19 08:11
【摘要】:由发达国家主导的知识产权保护标准基本上实现了全球化的目标。知识产权法律全球化的直接后果就是知识产权与人权的冲突,尤其是《世界贸易组织与贸易有关的知识产权协议》(以下简称TRIPS协议)对人权构成了直接冲击,本文针对人权与知识产权两种权利范畴探讨两种国际体制(Regime),探讨知识产权法律全球化的演进,并描述全球化过程中知识产权的权利扩张图景;以人权条约产生、发展和人权本身的演变轨迹考察全球化条件下人权的成长情况。分析两种权利在全球化条件下冲突与并存的情况,通过对国际条约的文本分析、伦理分析以及经济分析,研究人权与知识产权两种权利的冲突原因、冲突表现和冲突的全球治理情况,并尝试探求知识产权全球治理的人权进路。 引言部分,主要提出研究的问题与研究目的,阐明分析的路径与方法。 第一章,对作为财产权的知识产权进行研究,讨论了有关知识产权的概念和特征、评价关于知识产权正当性(Justification)的学说,通过对财产权意义上的知识产权的讨论与分析,为界定知识产权与人权的不同权利属性提供理论基础。 第二章,知识产权与人权的冲突产生的原因。知识产权对人权产生冲击,正是知识产权法律全球化过程中产生的结果,本章主要讨论知识产权法律全球化的进程与影响,探析知识产权与人权冲突的各种原因。 第三章,分析知识产权与人权冲突的表现,重点分析《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》(TRIPS协议)对人权的冲击。初步分析知识产权与人权冲突的表现;鉴于正是世界贸易组织的TRIPS协议引起国际社会对知识产权与人权冲突问题的高度关注并开展相应的全球治理行动,TRIPS协议是触发国际社会“知识产权的人权”议题的触媒剂,也是人权与知识产权冲突的焦点,因此本章着重对TRIPS协议与人权问题展开讨论,指出实现国际人权条约下的人权义务和实现TRIPS条约下的知识产权保护义务两方面具有不平衡性。 第四章,分析知识产权与人权的冲突产生的原因。首先,明确了利益冲突是知识产权与人权的冲突产生的根本原因。其次,全球化条件下人权的成长与知识产权的扩展导致权利冲突。最后,由于国际法律对人权的识别和确认模糊不清,也导致了在更多的方面潜在人权与知识产权的冲突与紧张。而另外还有一种冲突源自“软法”和“硬法”的冲突。 结束语部分得出研究结论:现存的知识产权国际体制是与人权相冲突的,必须通过全球治理建立一个符合人权目标的知识产权体制。我国应采取积极措施,在满足知识产权国际公约最低保护要求前提下,充分利用国际公约的选择性条款和限制性条款,从最大程度地保障我国知识产权利益出发,确定是否应当保护以及如何保护;以利益平衡原则为指导,进一步完善知识产权法律制度,尤其是要尽快出台规制知识产权滥用行为的法律条款;紧密结合国家知识产权战略,建立以知识产权为导向的公共政策体系;密切关注国际知识产权制度发展的最新动态,积极参与到知识产权国际事务的交流与合作。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property protection standard led by developed countries has basically realized the goal of globalization. The direct consequence of the legal globalization of intellectual property is that the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, in particular the TRIPS Agreement, is a direct impact on human rights, In the light of the two categories of rights and intellectual property rights, this paper discusses the two international regimes (Regime), discusses the evolution of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and describes the expansion of the right of the intellectual property right in the process of globalization; it is produced by the human rights treaty, The evolution of the development and human rights itself examines the growth of human rights in the context of globalization. By analyzing the conflicts and co-existence of the two rights under the conditions of globalization, through the text analysis, the ethical analysis and the economic analysis of the international treaties, the causes of the conflict between the two rights of human rights and intellectual property, the conflict performance and the global governance of the conflict are studied. And try to explore the human rights approach to the global governance of intellectual property. The introduction part, mainly put forward the research question and the research purpose, clarify the path and the party of the analysis The first chapter studies the intellectual property right as property right, discusses the concept and characteristics of the intellectual property right, and evaluates the theory about the legitimacy of intellectual property, and through the discussion of the intellectual property right in the sense of property right and analysis to provide a basis for defining the different rights attributes of intellectual property rights and human rights On the foundation. Chapter two, the conflict between intellectual property and human rights The impact of intellectual property rights on human rights is the result of the process of the legal globalization of intellectual property. This chapter mainly discusses the process and influence of the legal globalization of intellectual property, and probes into the conflict between intellectual property and human rights. The third chapter analyses the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights, with a focus on the analysis of the TRIPS Agreement (TRIPS) ) Impact on human rights. Initial analysis of the performance of the conflict between intellectual property and human rights; in view of the fact that the TRIPS Agreement of the World Trade Organization has raised the international community's high interest in the issue of intellectual property and human rights conflicts and the corresponding global governance action, the TRIPS Agreement is the trigger of the international community "Human rights of international property" The topic's catalytic agent is also the focus of the conflict between human rights and intellectual property rights, so this chapter focuses on the discussion on the TRIPS Agreement and human rights issues, pointing out the realization of the human rights obligations under international human rights treaties and the realization of the protection of intellectual property rights under the TRIPS Treaty There is an imbalance in the face. Chapter 4, Analysis of Intellectual Property and Human The conflict of the right is the cause of the conflict. First, it is clear that the conflict of interest is intellectual property and human rights The root causes of the conflict. Second, the growth of human rights and intellectual property rights under the condition of globalization The extension of the right to conflict leads to a conflict of rights. Finally, the recognition and recognition of human rights by international law has also led to the potential human rights and knowledge in more ways To recognize the conflict and tension of property rights. There is also a conflict that is derived from the "soft method" and the "hard method" The conclusion is that the existing international system of intellectual property is in conflict with human rights and must be established through global governance. Our country should take active measures to make full use of the optional clauses and restrictive clauses of the international conventions, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country to the greatest extent, in order to guarantee the interests of the intellectual property rights of our country. No protection and protection should be protected; in the light of the principle of interest balance, the legal system of intellectual property rights should be further improved, in particular, the legal provisions regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights should be introduced as soon as possible; and the national intellectual property strategy should be closely integrated, and knowledge production should be established. Right-oriented public policy system; pay close attention to the latest developments in the development of the international intellectual property system, and actively participate in the knowledge production
【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D996.1;D997.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 叶传星;;人权概念的理论分歧解析[J];法学家;2005年06期

2 鲁浪浪;;论知识产权领域社会正义的实现[J];法制与社会;2009年15期

3 李良才;;人权理念对国际法价值取向的人本化改造[J];甘肃联合大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期

4 徐莉;;论贸易与人权保护制度的协调[J];时代法学;2009年02期

5 陈瑛琦;;TRIPS协议第31条修正案研究[J];合作经济与科技;2009年17期

6 沈宗灵;权利、义务、权力[J];法学研究;1998年03期

7 李杨;陈思琴;;传统知识保护的自然法合理性初探——从集体人权与罗尔斯“正义论”的角度来审视[J];南昌航空大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期

8 陈亦超;;国际知识产权保护中的人权问题——从药品强制许可谈起[J];丽水学院学报;2009年01期

9 郑欣;;论知识产权人身权与人权[J];牡丹江大学学报;2009年08期

10 胜雅律;;人权概念在联合国的发展[J];人权;2009年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 马秀山;[N];中国知识产权报;2004年

2 邵培樟;[N];中国知识产权报;2004年

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 王培舒;知识产权与人权的联系、冲突与协调发展[D];吉林大学;2007年

2 赵宴群;文化权利的确立与实现[D];复旦大学;2007年

3 胡朝阳;论知识产权的正当性[D];南京师范大学;2006年

4 衣淑玲;国际人权法视角下《TRIPS协定》的变革研究[D];厦门大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 田胜;知识产权与人权的冲突和协调[D];中南民族大学;2007年

2 孙秀红;知识产权国际保护与人权关系问题研究[D];吉林大学;2008年

3 侯淑芬;论艾滋病防治领域的国际法新问题[D];中国海洋大学;2008年

4 颜君;WTO中人权相关条款研究[D];外交学院;2009年



本文编号:2460778

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2460778.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c9e01***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com