船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体问题研究
发布时间：2019-04-29 18:23
【摘要】：船舶碰撞损害赔偿问题是船舶发生碰撞事故后亟需解决的紧要问题,而确定适格的责任主体来承担赔偿责任又是其中至关重要的一环。对于船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体的确定问题,国际上1910年的《统一船舶碰撞若干法律规定的国际公约》中规定,由有过失的船舶承担赔偿责任,但因我国是不承认“对物诉讼”的国家,故受害人不能将“船舶”作为被告而对其直接提出诉讼。纵观我国法律体系,《中华人民共和国海商法》中并未对此有明确规定,只能依赖《最高人民法院关于审理船舶碰撞纠纷案件若干问题的规定》这一司法解释,而该司法解释也未从根本上解决这个问题。鉴于此,本文意从我国实际情况出发,以船舶碰撞的立法和实践为基础,以侵权责任法的理论为支撑,参照国内外有关船舶碰撞的理论研究成果,对船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体进行比较系统的、全面的研究,并在此基础上提出一些关于船舶碰撞立法的建议和意见,为我国船舶碰撞责任制度的建设贡献一份微薄之力。 本文共分为4章。 第1章,船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体概述。本章主要从船舶碰撞责任主体的定义、特点以及构成要件三个方面,对本文涉及的基本概念进行阐释,同时指出当前国内立法关于船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体问题的规定所存在的问题,为后文的研究奠定基础。 第2章,相关国家关于船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体的立法研究。本章从国际视角出发,对其他先进国家船舶碰撞责任制度的立法进行述评和研究,并从中借鉴和吸取对我国国内立法有用的宝贵经验。 第3章,船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体的确定原则。本章在侵权责任法理论的支撑下,借鉴英国、加拿大等国家成功的立法经验,总结出确定船舶碰撞责任主体应遵循的两个原则,替代责任原则和实际管理控制船舶原则,为下文确定责任主体提供依据。 第4章,船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体的识别与判定。本章从航运实践出发,运用判定船舶碰撞责任主体的两大原则,着重分析了船舶所有人、光船承租人、船舶经营人以及船舶管理人的责任主体法律地位,以此确定船舶碰撞法律关系中真止的责任主体。
[Abstract]:The problem of ship collision damage compensation is an urgent problem to be solved after the collision accident, and it is very important to determine the suitable liability subject to bear the liability. With regard to the determination of the subject of liability for ship collision damage, the International Convention for the Unification of certain provisions of laws governing collision of ships in 1910 stipulates that the ship with fault shall bear liability for damages. However, because China is a country that does not recognize the "action against rem", the victim cannot take the ship as the defendant and bring a suit against it directly. Throughout China's legal system, there is no clear provision in the Maritime Law of the people's Republic of China, which can only rely on the judicial interpretation of the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on certain issues in handling ship collision disputes, And the judicial interpretation has not fundamentally solved this problem. In view of this, this paper aims to proceed from the actual situation of our country, based on the legislation and practice of ship collision, with the theory of tort liability law as the support, and referring to the theoretical research results of ship collision at home and abroad. This paper makes a systematic and comprehensive study on the subject of liability for ship collision damage, and on this basis, puts forward some suggestions and suggestions on the legislation of ship collision, which contributes a slight contribution to the construction of ship collision liability system in China. This paper is divided into four chapters. Chapter 1 summarizes the main body of liability for ship collision damage. This chapter mainly explains the basic concepts involved in this paper from three aspects: the definition, the characteristics and the constituent elements of the subject of ship collision liability. At the same time, it points out the problems existing in the current domestic legislation on the subject of liability for ship collision damage, which lays a foundation for the later research. Chapter 2, related countries on the main body of liability for ship collision damage legislation research. From the international angle of view, this chapter reviews and studies the legislation of ship collision liability system in other advanced countries, and draws lessons from the valuable experience which is useful to our country's domestic legislation. Chapter 3, the principle of determining the subject of liability for ship collision damage. Supported by the theory of tort liability law, this chapter draws lessons from the successful legislative experiences of Britain, Canada and other countries, and summarizes the two principles that should be followed to determine the subject of ship collision liability, the principle of substitute liability and the principle of actual management and control of ships. To provide the basis for determining the subject of responsibility below. Chapter 4, the identification and judgment of the subject of liability for ship collision damage. Starting from the practice of shipping, using the two principles of determining the subject of ship collision liability, this chapter emphatically analyzes the legal status of the liability subject of ship owner, bareboat charterer, ship operator and ship manager, and analyzes the legal status of ship owner, ship charterer, ship operator and ship manager. So as to determine the real liability subject in the legal relationship of ship collision.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.294;D996.19
本文编号：2468429
[Abstract]:The problem of ship collision damage compensation is an urgent problem to be solved after the collision accident, and it is very important to determine the suitable liability subject to bear the liability. With regard to the determination of the subject of liability for ship collision damage, the International Convention for the Unification of certain provisions of laws governing collision of ships in 1910 stipulates that the ship with fault shall bear liability for damages. However, because China is a country that does not recognize the "action against rem", the victim cannot take the ship as the defendant and bring a suit against it directly. Throughout China's legal system, there is no clear provision in the Maritime Law of the people's Republic of China, which can only rely on the judicial interpretation of the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on certain issues in handling ship collision disputes, And the judicial interpretation has not fundamentally solved this problem. In view of this, this paper aims to proceed from the actual situation of our country, based on the legislation and practice of ship collision, with the theory of tort liability law as the support, and referring to the theoretical research results of ship collision at home and abroad. This paper makes a systematic and comprehensive study on the subject of liability for ship collision damage, and on this basis, puts forward some suggestions and suggestions on the legislation of ship collision, which contributes a slight contribution to the construction of ship collision liability system in China. This paper is divided into four chapters. Chapter 1 summarizes the main body of liability for ship collision damage. This chapter mainly explains the basic concepts involved in this paper from three aspects: the definition, the characteristics and the constituent elements of the subject of ship collision liability. At the same time, it points out the problems existing in the current domestic legislation on the subject of liability for ship collision damage, which lays a foundation for the later research. Chapter 2, related countries on the main body of liability for ship collision damage legislation research. From the international angle of view, this chapter reviews and studies the legislation of ship collision liability system in other advanced countries, and draws lessons from the valuable experience which is useful to our country's domestic legislation. Chapter 3, the principle of determining the subject of liability for ship collision damage. Supported by the theory of tort liability law, this chapter draws lessons from the successful legislative experiences of Britain, Canada and other countries, and summarizes the two principles that should be followed to determine the subject of ship collision liability, the principle of substitute liability and the principle of actual management and control of ships. To provide the basis for determining the subject of responsibility below. Chapter 4, the identification and judgment of the subject of liability for ship collision damage. Starting from the practice of shipping, using the two principles of determining the subject of ship collision liability, this chapter emphatically analyzes the legal status of the liability subject of ship owner, bareboat charterer, ship operator and ship manager, and analyzes the legal status of ship owner, ship charterer, ship operator and ship manager. So as to determine the real liability subject in the legal relationship of ship collision.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.294;D996.19
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曲涛;;船舶碰撞损害赔偿责任主体之认定[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
2 翟新辉;;租赁权公示是取得物权对抗效力的要件[J];法律适用;2007年09期
3 杨立新;;中国侵权责任法应当如何规定侵权责任形态[J];法律适用;2008年08期
4 张丽敏;;船舶经营人与船舶管理人之辨析[J];广东交通职业技术学院学报;2006年01期
5 胡正良;船舶管理公司的法律地位与责任[J];世界海运;2004年03期
6 曲涛;;船舶管理人在船舶碰撞中的法律责任研究[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年03期
7 米健;再论现代侵权行为法的归责原则——兼答张佩霖先生[J];政法论坛;1991年02期
8 毛瑞兆;论雇主的替代责任[J];政法论坛;2004年03期
9 沈晓平;英国对物诉讼的新发展——评“Indian Grace(No.2)”一案[J];中国海商法年刊;2000年00期
10 朱作贤;光船租赁权与物权公示原则——兼论对我国《船舶登记条例》第6条的理解[J];中国海商法年刊;2001年00期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 吴辉生;船舶碰撞原因分析及责任认定[D];上海海事大学;2004年
2 王益烽;船舶碰撞损害赔偿研究[D];上海海事大学;2004年
3 耿新颖;船舶经营人的识别及其法律地位[D];大连海事大学;2006年
4 杨安山;“船舶经营人”研究[D];上海海事大学;2006年
，本文编号：2468429
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2468429.html
