开放发展与国际法:风险及应对

发布时间：2019-05-14 23:05

【摘要】：采取疏离国际法的策略去参与全球化、推进开放发展,可能给中国带来的是认同风险和声誉风险;反之,如果采用借助国际法的方式,遇到的主要风险是观点风险和能力风险。认同风险是国家与民众对于本国在国际社会中的行为方式和身份的认同缺失;声誉风险是国家在世界上采取行动所积累的信用降低。这些是对国家发展至关重要的核心决定因素,国家无法克服这两种风险转化为现实威胁的严重后果。所以,这种风险是不可解的,必须尽最大努力避免此种风险,改为借助国际法的策略进行发展。观念风险主要是国家开放发展过程中的各种国际法无用论或虚无论观念;能力风险则主要是国家所存在的体系认知、立法技术和专业队伍的差距。如果采用借助国际法的策略开放发展,应对两种风险的主要决定因素来自国家内部,因而是可以克服和改变的。通过自身的认真钻研、锐意创新,就能够达到充分利用国际法、改进原有国际法体系的目标,从而为中国及世界各国寻求互利共赢的发展道路。
[Abstract]:Adopting the strategy of alienation from international law to participate in globalization and promote open development may bring identity risk and reputation risk to China. On the contrary, if we adopt the way of international law, the main risks encountered are viewpoint risk and capacity risk. The risk of identity is the lack of recognition between the state and the people of their own behavior and identity in the international community, and the risk of reputation is the decrease of credit accumulated by the state taking action in the world. These are the core determining factors critical to national development, and the state is unable to overcome the serious consequences of translating these two risks into real threats. Therefore, this risk is inexplicable, and every effort must be made to avoid it and to develop it in the light of the strategies of international law. Concept risk is mainly a variety of useless theories of international law or virtual ideas in the process of national opening and development, while capacity risk is mainly the gap between system cognition, legislative technology and professional team in the process of national opening up. If the strategy of international law is adopted to open up development, the main determining factors to deal with the two risks come from within the State, so they can be overcome and changed. Through their own careful study and determined innovation, we can achieve the goal of making full use of international law and improving the original system of international law, so as to find a mutually beneficial and win-win development path for China and other countries in the world.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重点研究基地项目“提升中国话语权与国际法律制度变革”(16JJD820010)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D99

【相似文献】