利用ICSID解决中非投资争议的思考
发布时间：2019-05-21 08:21
【摘要】：国际投资争端解决中心ICSID为解决有关国际投资的投资者与东道国之间的纠纷提供了一套有效的解决机制，对促进国际投资争端的合理解决有着十分重要的积极意义。从中心解决的案件来看，有很大一部分涉及非洲国家，这不仅是因为国际投资的资金主要由相对发达国家流向相对欠发达国家，而且因为非洲国家法制体系欠健全以及法律公正性的相对欠缺致使非洲地区成为国际投资争端的高发地区。近年来，中非投资数量也呈大幅上升趋势，我国对非直接投资不断增加的同时，有关中国海外投资的纠纷也呈上升趋势，因此，合理有效利用ICSID机制成为解决中非投资争端需要重要考虑的问题，对中心争端解决机制的分析研究对我国投资者利益合理有效的保护将起到十分重要的作用。 本文将涉及非洲国家参与ICSID仲裁的主要问题分为三大部分，“投资”界定，“管辖权”问题，以及涉及的非洲国家裁决的承认和执行问题。文章第二章主要目的是通过对中心有关“投资”定义产生争议的案件分析，总结中心通过关于投资定义案件的处理确立管辖权的方式，分析相关的重要案情，从而对我国与非洲国家签订的投资条约中得“投资”界定提供有效的建议。文章第三章主要概括中心处理的有关非洲国家投资争端的属人管辖问题，根据相关的涉及非洲国家案件的处理分析属人管辖的特点和发展，总结ICSID确立属人管辖权的发展趋势，对我国的投资主体的同意方式以及如何规定投资主体做出有利的提示。文章的第四章主要分析了涉及对非洲国家仲裁裁决执行中出现的困难，揭示我国寻求对非洲国家仲裁裁决的承认与执行中可能出现的问题。文章的最后一章是对前三章分析的三大问题的总结，并结合中非投资现状和中非投资条约分析我国应对中非投资争端中可能出现的问题以及应当如何完善中非投资条约，分别就“投资”界定、管辖权、仲裁裁决承认与执行三部分对我国利用ICSID机制解决中非投资争端提出相应的建议，，对我国与非洲国家签订双边投资条约时内容规定以及条款的完善进行相应的分析。
[Abstract]:The Center for the settlement of International Investment disputes (ICSID) provides an effective settlement mechanism for the settlement of disputes between investors and host countries related to international investment, which is of great positive significance to promote the rational settlement of international investment disputes. Judging from the cases resolved by the Centre, a large proportion of them involve African countries, not only because funds for international investment flow mainly from relatively developed countries to relatively less developed countries, And because of the imperfect legal system and the relative lack of legal fairness in African countries, Africa has become a high incidence of international investment disputes. In recent years, the amount of China-Africa investment has also shown a sharp upward trend. While China's indirect investment is increasing, disputes over China's overseas investment are also on the rise. Therefore, The rational and effective use of ICSID mechanism has become an important problem to be considered in the settlement of investment disputes between China and Africa. The analysis and study of the central dispute settlement mechanism will play a very important role in the reasonable and effective protection of the interests of investors in our country. In this paper, the main issues related to the participation of African countries in ICSID arbitration are divided into three parts: the definition of "investment", the issue of "jurisdiction", and the recognition and enforcement of African national awards. The main purpose of the second chapter of the article is to analyze the important cases related to the definition of "investment" through the analysis of the controversial cases concerning the definition of "investment" by the center, and to summarize the way in which the center establishes jurisdiction through the handling of the cases concerning the definition of investment. Thus, it provides effective suggestions for the definition of investment in the investment treaties signed between China and African countries. The third chapter of the article mainly summarizes the issues related to the personal jurisdiction of investment disputes in African countries dealt with by the Centre. According to the analysis of the characteristics and development of personal jurisdiction in the handling of cases involving African countries, this paper summarizes the development trend of establishing personal jurisdiction in ICSID. Make favorable tips on the consent mode of the investment subject in our country and how to stipulate the investment subject. The fourth chapter of the article mainly analyzes the difficulties involved in the enforcement of arbitral awards in African countries, and reveals the problems that may arise in the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in African countries. The last chapter of the article is a summary of the three major problems analyzed in the first three chapters, and analyzes the possible problems in China's response to China-Africa investment disputes and how to improve the China-Africa investment treaties in the light of the current situation of China-Africa investment and the China-Africa investment treaties. Three parts, namely, the definition of "investment", jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, put forward corresponding suggestions for China to use ICSID mechanism to solve investment disputes between China and Africa. This paper analyzes the perfection of the contents and provisions of bilateral investment treaties between China and African countries.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4
本文编号：2481961
[Abstract]:The Center for the settlement of International Investment disputes (ICSID) provides an effective settlement mechanism for the settlement of disputes between investors and host countries related to international investment, which is of great positive significance to promote the rational settlement of international investment disputes. Judging from the cases resolved by the Centre, a large proportion of them involve African countries, not only because funds for international investment flow mainly from relatively developed countries to relatively less developed countries, And because of the imperfect legal system and the relative lack of legal fairness in African countries, Africa has become a high incidence of international investment disputes. In recent years, the amount of China-Africa investment has also shown a sharp upward trend. While China's indirect investment is increasing, disputes over China's overseas investment are also on the rise. Therefore, The rational and effective use of ICSID mechanism has become an important problem to be considered in the settlement of investment disputes between China and Africa. The analysis and study of the central dispute settlement mechanism will play a very important role in the reasonable and effective protection of the interests of investors in our country. In this paper, the main issues related to the participation of African countries in ICSID arbitration are divided into three parts: the definition of "investment", the issue of "jurisdiction", and the recognition and enforcement of African national awards. The main purpose of the second chapter of the article is to analyze the important cases related to the definition of "investment" through the analysis of the controversial cases concerning the definition of "investment" by the center, and to summarize the way in which the center establishes jurisdiction through the handling of the cases concerning the definition of investment. Thus, it provides effective suggestions for the definition of investment in the investment treaties signed between China and African countries. The third chapter of the article mainly summarizes the issues related to the personal jurisdiction of investment disputes in African countries dealt with by the Centre. According to the analysis of the characteristics and development of personal jurisdiction in the handling of cases involving African countries, this paper summarizes the development trend of establishing personal jurisdiction in ICSID. Make favorable tips on the consent mode of the investment subject in our country and how to stipulate the investment subject. The fourth chapter of the article mainly analyzes the difficulties involved in the enforcement of arbitral awards in African countries, and reveals the problems that may arise in the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in African countries. The last chapter of the article is a summary of the three major problems analyzed in the first three chapters, and analyzes the possible problems in China's response to China-Africa investment disputes and how to improve the China-Africa investment treaties in the light of the current situation of China-Africa investment and the China-Africa investment treaties. Three parts, namely, the definition of "investment", jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, put forward corresponding suggestions for China to use ICSID mechanism to solve investment disputes between China and Africa. This paper analyzes the perfection of the contents and provisions of bilateral investment treaties between China and African countries.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 祝海燕;;论我国双边投资条约对ICSID管辖权的接受[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
2 金成华;;评析国际投资争端中心仲裁制度[J];国际商务.对外经济贸易大学学报;2006年05期
3 李万强;;ICSID管辖权行使的法律实践与中国的对策[J];国际经济法论丛;2000年00期
4 梁咏;;海外直接投资中的中国投资者认定之新探——从解读ICSID数个著名案例的视角[J];国际商务研究;2008年02期
5 张光;;中国利用ICSID国际仲裁机制的立法思考[J];广西财经学院学报;2006年02期
6 李先平;;双边投资协定中的争端解决条款研究——我国应在何种程度上接受ICSID的管辖权[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2011年01期
7 袁海英;刘海燕;;解决投资争议国际中心仲裁机制评析[J];特区经济;2010年08期
8 张潇剑;;论ICSID仲裁裁决的承认与执行[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年04期
9 邓婷婷;;国际投资仲裁中“投资者的期待”原则[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年05期
10 胡勇;秦丽;;“投资”定义与ICSID管辖权[J];宜宾学院学报;2006年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘亘;中非双边投资条约（BIT）研究[D];湘潭大学;2010年
2 温利卿;“解决投资争端国际中心”管辖权制度研究[D];外交学院;2009年
本文编号：2481961
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2481961.html
