多边视角下的教育服务贸易市场准入:法律壁垒与解决途径
发布时间：2019-05-26 22:18
【摘要】：面对教育服务贸易全球化趋势的不断加强,各成员都试图在自身现实需求与利益保护之间寻求市场准入的平衡。但在多边贸易规则体系下,不同利益群体之间仍存在复杂的分歧与博弈,教育服务贸易市场准入的发展还面临诸多法律壁垒。未来要想有所突破,应充分利用好当前多边贸易规则体系的已有平台,发挥其它国际性、区域性公约和双边协议的作用,继续完善国内教育服务贸易涉外法律体系。而我国也应利用现有规则,适度开放,完善法规体系,建立与自身发展需要相适应的教育服务贸易法规体系。
[Abstract]:In the face of the strengthening of the globalization trend of educational service trade, each member tries to seek the balance of market access between their own realistic needs and the protection of interests. However, under the multilateral trade rule system, there are still complex differences and games among different interest groups, and the development of market access to educational services trade is still facing many legal barriers. In order to make a breakthrough in the future, we should make full use of the existing platforms of the current multilateral trade rule system, give full play to the role of other international and regional conventions and bilateral agreements, and continue to improve the foreign-related legal system of domestic trade in educational services. Our country should also make use of the existing rules, moderately open, perfect the legal system, and establish the legal system of educational service trade in accordance with the needs of our own development.
【作者单位】： 四川外国语大学国际商学院;
【基金】：四川外国语大学年度科研项目“‘走出去’背景下我国企业海外投资法律保障问题研究”(sisu201608)
【分类号】：D99;F752.68
[Abstract]:In the face of the strengthening of the globalization trend of educational service trade, each member tries to seek the balance of market access between their own realistic needs and the protection of interests. However, under the multilateral trade rule system, there are still complex differences and games among different interest groups, and the development of market access to educational services trade is still facing many legal barriers. In order to make a breakthrough in the future, we should make full use of the existing platforms of the current multilateral trade rule system, give full play to the role of other international and regional conventions and bilateral agreements, and continue to improve the foreign-related legal system of domestic trade in educational services. Our country should also make use of the existing rules, moderately open, perfect the legal system, and establish the legal system of educational service trade in accordance with the needs of our own development.
【作者单位】： 四川外国语大学国际商学院;
【基金】：四川外国语大学年度科研项目“‘走出去’背景下我国企业海外投资法律保障问题研究”(sisu201608)
【分类号】：D99;F752.68
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张进清;;广西与马来西亚教育服务贸易发展研究[J];东南亚纵横;2006年10期
2 代明;;台湾教育服务贸易的边缘化困境与出路[J];台湾研究;2007年02期
3 张曙霄;孙媛媛;;中俄教育服务贸易比较与启示[J];东北亚论坛;2009年02期
4 金孝柏;;我国的教育服务贸易与立法[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2008年10期
5 李志雄;;论广西打造“教育出口大省(区)”的意义和可能性——广西留学教育服务贸易发展路径与策略研究(一)[J];法制与经济(上旬);2011年12期
6 吴岩;从教育承诺看WTO的影响[J];政策;2003年09期
7 胡吉红;;广西与泰国教育服务贸易发展研究[J];东南亚纵横;2007年01期
8 姜栽植;;中韩教育服务贸易的现状及对策建议[J];延边党校学报;2010年06期
9 张银静;;韩国教育服务贸易市场开放的法律问题研究[J];科技创业月刊;2011年03期
10 彭运锋;;教育服务贸易走出去[J];w挛胖芸，
本文编号：2485677
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2485677.html
