国际商事仲裁司法审查制度研究

发布时间：2019-06-02 07:38

【摘要】：论文讨论了国际商事仲示司法审查的价值取向及主要内容,全文在结构上分为五章。写作思路是对国际商事仲裁司法审查的理论和实践进行实证和规范的考查,围绕国际商事仲裁司法审查制度的一个主要价值目标、四个关键环节展开论述,并结合每一章讨论的问题,对我国司法审查制度存在的相关问题和缺陷提出具有针对性的建构方案。第一章讨论国际商事仲裁司法审查的若干基本问题,围绕司法审查的价值目标,主要讨论三个问题。一是国际商事仲裁的概念,二是司法审查的概念,三是论述国际商事仲裁司法审查的正当性及适度性。写作进路是通过厘清一些与研究主题相关的概念和法理的问题,理顺司法与国际商事仲裁的相互关系,奠定司法审查制度价值取向的法理基础。本章的重点是从法经济学的角度分析论证司法审查的价值追求应该是支持仲裁,即法院或法官应倾向于尽可能由仲裁解决纠纷、倾向于认定仲裁协议有效；倾向于程序审查为主、实体审查为辅；倾向于承认与执行裁决为主、拒绝承认与执行仲裁裁决为辅。同时还对我国司法审查制度在立法理念方面的不足展开评述,提出我国应在国际、国内商事仲裁司法审查方面实行并轨,并在司法审查范围上实行适度监督模式的建构意见。第二章专题论述对国际商事仲裁协议有效性的司法审查。仲裁协议是国际商事仲裁的基础,也是司法审查的第一个关键环节,因此,本章作为研究司法审查的具体内容的第一章来考查对仲裁协议有效性的司法审查。从传统理论和各国的具体实践来看,主流的做法是奉行依据当事人意思自治的原则来确定仲裁协议的准据法,同时以其他方式作为补充。法院对国际商事仲裁协议有效性监督的具体内容包括：仲裁协议是否具备法定的形式要件和实质要件,仲裁协议有关内容是否符合可仲裁性的强制性规定等。在对我国司法审查制度进行比较分析的基础上,本章提出了合理构建有关仲裁协议的形式和实质性要件的机制,并适当拓展可仲裁性范围等立法建议。第三章讨论国际商事仲裁程序的司法审查问题。当事人在国际商事仲裁进行过程中也可能发生争议。由于仲裁的民间性特点,人们往往会寻求司法的干预来保障仲裁程序的顺利进行。本章主要讨论司法对国际商事仲裁程序进行的积极协助与支持。在对我国的有关制度进行比较评析的基础上,提出设立支持仲裁庭组成、合并仲裁制度、仲裁临时措施等机制的建议。第四章关于国际商事仲裁裁决的司法审查。仲裁裁决是司法审查的最重要焦点之一。一般来说,只有裁决地国法院才有权行使裁决的撤销这种追诉权。因此,撤销裁决涉及裁决的国籍识别问题。当前解决识别问题的主流标准是仲裁地标准,即仲裁地法院具有撤销仲裁裁决的管辖权。只有具备普遍认可的撤销条件,仲裁地法院才能撤销裁决。传统理论认为,已被撤销后的裁决不再具有法律效力而被执行,但一些区域协定已有创新规定,即对某些特殊的已被撤销的裁决仍然赋予执行力。本章对这些制度创新和实践创新进行了评述,并在此基础上,提出修改我国的仲裁裁决国籍识别制度、完善裁决撤销理由制度、重构裁决异议审查报告制度等立法建议。第五章关于承认与执行国际商事仲裁裁决的司法审查。是否承认与执行国际商事裁决是司法审查的最后环节,也是最重要的环节。一般说来,承认与执行裁决的司法审查权由被申请人国或者被执行财产所在地国法院行使。如同对国际仲裁裁决的司法审查一样,这也涉及裁决的国籍识别问题。比较通行的国籍判断标准是1958年《承认和执行外国仲裁裁决公约》(又称《纽约公约》)确定的裁决作成地标准和非内国裁决标准。我国司法实践日益趋近国际上的主流实践,但在制度层面还存在一些不足,主要表现在：我国国际商事仲裁国籍识别标准采用仲裁机构国籍标准,与国际主流标准有很大差异,在操作实务上容易出现相互矛盾的情况；缺乏对非《纽约公约》裁决的具体规制；也缺乏对公共秩序政策适用、司法审查裁定的上诉制度等方面的具体规制等。本章针对这些问题提出了相应的建议。论文的最后部分是结束语,也是对全文的总结。论文在这部分首先概括了各国关于国际商事仲裁司法审查的立法和司法实践理念,即对国际商事仲裁的全力支持与适度监督。接着勾勒了我国的司法审查制度应当引进的先进立法理念。最后,集中地对我国司法审查制度的几个重点部分提出了综合性的立法建议。
[Abstract]:The article discusses the value orientation and main content of the judicial review of the international commercial law, and the full text is divided into five chapters. The idea of writing is to examine the theory and practice of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration, and to discuss the four key links around the main value goal of the judicial review system of international commercial arbitration, and to combine the problems discussed in each chapter. The relevant problems and defects in the system of judicial review in China are put forward. The first chapter discusses some basic problems of judicial review of international commercial arbitration, and discusses three questions about the value goal of judicial review. The first is the concept of international commercial arbitration, the second is the concept of judicial review, and the third is to discuss the validity and the right of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration. The writing route is a legal basis for clarifying the relationship between the judicial and the international commercial arbitration, and laying the foundation for the value orientation of the judicial review system by clarifying some of the concepts and the legal theory related to the subject of the study. The focus of this chapter is to analyze the value pursuit of judicial review from the perspective of law economics. The value pursuit of judicial review should be to support the arbitration, that is, the court or the judge should be inclined to settle the dispute as much as possible, and it is inclined to find that the arbitration agreement is valid; it is preferred that the procedure review be the main, and the entity shall review it as the main body in favour of recognition and enforcement of that award, the refusal to recognize and enforce the arbitral award is At the same time, the author makes a comment on the insufficiency of the system of judicial review in China, and puts forward that China should adopt and track the judicial review of international and domestic commercial arbitration, and implement the construction of the appropriate supervision mode in the scope of judicial review. See chap. II. Thematic discussion on the effectiveness of the international commercial arbitration agreement The arbitration agreement is the basis of the international commercial arbitration and the first key link of judicial review. Therefore, this chapter is the first chapter of the specific content of the judicial review to examine the division of the validity of the arbitration agreement. From the traditional theory and the concrete practice of each country, the main approach is to follow the principle of self-government of the parties to determine the applicable law of the arbitration agreement, and to do so in other ways In order to supplement, the specific content of the court's supervision on the effectiveness of the international commercial arbitration agreement includes whether the arbitration agreement has the legal form and essential elements, and whether the relevant content of the arbitration agreement is in conformity with the enforceability of the arbitration agreement On the basis of the comparative analysis of the judicial review system in China, this chapter put forward the mechanism of reasonable construction of the form and the substantive elements of the arbitration agreement, and extended the scope of the arbitrability appropriately. Legal recommendations. Chapter III discusses the Division for International Commercial Arbitration in that course of the conduct of international commercial arbitration, the parties may also Disputes can occur. People tend to seek judicial intervention to guarantee the arbitration proceedings due to the folklore of the arbitration. The present chapter mainly discusses the positive effect of the administration of justice on the procedure of international commercial arbitration. On the basis of comparing and analyzing the relevant system of our country, this paper puts forward the establishment of supporting the arbitration tribunal, combining the arbitration system, the arbitration interim measure and so on. Recommendations of the mechanism. Chapter IV on international commercial arbitration Judicial review of the award. The arbitral award is a judicial review. One of the most important focuses. In general, only the court of the State of the country has the right to exercise its decision. The right to appeal is to be withdrawn. Therefore, the revocation of the award relates to a decision The issue of the identification of nationality is the standard of the arbitration, that is, the court of the place of arbitration has the withdrawal of the secondary. The jurisdiction of the award. There is only a general recognition of the conditions of the revocation, the method of arbitration, The court can revoke the ruling. The traditional theory holds that the award that has been revoked no longer has the legal effect and is implemented, but some regional agreements have provided for innovative provisions, that is, for certain special, revoked decisions In this chapter, the innovation and practice of these systems are reviewed, and on this basis, it is proposed to modify the recognition system of the nationality of the arbitration award of our country, to improve the system of the revocation of the decision and to reconstitute the report on the review of the objection of the decision. Legislative recommendations, such as the system. Chapter V deals with the recognition and enforcement of international commercial law Judicial review of arbitral awards. The recognition and enforcement of international commercial decisions is the final part of the judicial review It is also the most important part. In general, the right to a judicial review of the recognition and enforcement of a decision is made by the respondent State or the subject of execution in that case of a judicial review of an international arbitral award, this also concern The question of the identification of the nationality of the award. The comparison of the criteria for the determination of the nationality of the passage of nationality is a landmark in the determination made in 1958 of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (also referred to as the New York Convention) China's judicial practice is increasingly close to the international mainstream practice, but there are still some shortcomings in the system level. The main performance is that the international commercial arbitration nationality recognition standard of our country adopts the nationality standard of the arbitration institution, and it is the same as that of the international There is a significant difference in the mainstream standards, which are prone to conflicting situations in the practice of operation; the lack of specific regulations for non-New York Convention and decisions; and the lack of an appeal system for the application of public order policies and the judicial review of decisions And so on. This chapter is for these questions. The final part of the paper is the knot. In this part, the author summarizes the legislative and judicial practice of the judicial review of international commercial arbitration, that is, the international commercial secondary. The full support and moderate supervision of the cut-off, and then outlines the system of judicial review in our country. The advanced legislative idea that should be introduced. At last, some key parts of the judicial review system of our country
【学位授予单位】：武汉大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D997.4

【参考文献】