国际投资中公平公正待遇标准研究

发布时间：2019-06-13 11:43

【摘要】：经济全球化和投资自由化使国际投资产生的法律问题越来越受到关注。在国际投资领域投资者争取利益最大化与东道国加强对本国的法律监管存在天然难以调和的矛盾。特别是引人瞩目的《北美自由贸易协定》生效后，因投资者对东道国提起诉讼引发的多起案例使本身就极具争议的公平公正待遇标准得到了前所未有的关注。这些实践中的案例直接促使公平公正待遇标准在近年来得到长足的发展。由于公平公正待遇标准其本身具有抽象性并且难以进行具体适用，本文首先从确定其内涵着手，比较国际社会对公平公正待遇标准所持的不同态度，对其应涵盖的基本含义做一个概括的分析。然后根据国际投资协定中关于公平公正待遇标准体现的条款并结合早期及晚近发生的与其有关的仲裁实践，来寻证作为一个不确定性的待遇保护标准所应该基本涵盖的要素。随后从不同的角度对公平公正待遇标准与国民待遇标准、最惠国待遇标准以及国际法最低待遇标准进行了比较与区分。从平衡东道国主权利益以及投资者合法权益为出发点，通过分析这些可能包含其中的要素以及其不从属于他者的性质，论证了公平公正待遇标准更能体现法律所追求的公平、正义价值。最后，本文剖析了我国签订的国际投资协定，其中对于公平公正待遇标准不同措辞及杂乱的规定都需要进行修正，并据此分析了完善建议，以便对妥善解决我国将来可能面对与投资有关的纠纷有所裨益。本文在探讨有关公平公正待遇标准的内涵时综合运用了归纳分析方法，，通过对国际社会以及不同国家学者们的观点进行归类并总结分析出确定其可能包含的因素；另外还引入不同时期的仲裁实践，理论联系实践研究不同的仲裁裁决以确定公平公正待遇标准的独立地位；最后对他国的投资协定进行全面的对比分析，提出对我国有益的完善建议。
[Abstract]:Economic globalization and the liberalization of investment have attracted more and more attention to the legal issues arising from international investment. In the field of international investment, the maximization of the interests of investors in the field of international investment and the strengthening of the host country have a natural and hard-to-reconcile contradiction with the domestic legal supervision. In particular, after the entry into force of the attention of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a number of cases raised by the investor's litigation against the host country have given unprecedented attention to the highly controversial standards of fair and fair treatment. The cases in these practices directly contributed to the development of the standards of fair and fair treatment in recent years. Since the standard of fair and fair treatment is of abstract nature and is difficult to apply, the paper first begins with the definition of its connotation, compares the different attitude of the international community to the standard of fair and fair treatment, and makes an outline of the basic meaning that it covers. Analysis. Then, according to the provisions of the international investment agreement on the standard of fair and fair treatment and the arbitration practice related to the early and late, it is necessary to find the evidence to be covered by the standard of treatment protection as an uncertainty in that follow, the standard of fair and fair treatment and the standard of national treatment, the standard of most-favoured-nation treatment and the minimum standard of treatment for international law were then compared and region from a different point of view On the basis of balancing the sovereignty interests of the host country and the legitimate rights and interests of the investors, it is proved that the fair and fair treatment standard can better reflect the fairness and the justice price pursued by the law through the analysis of the elements that may contain them and the nature of them. Finally, this paper analyzes the international investment agreement signed by our country, among which, it is necessary to make the amendment to the different wording and the disorder of the fair and fair treatment standard, and the suggestions are also analyzed, so as to solve the disputes related to the investment in the future of our country. This paper, when exploring the connotation of the standard of fair and fair treatment, makes a comprehensive use of the inductive analysis method, and by classifying and summarizing the views of the international community and the scholars of different countries and summarizing the factors that can be included in the analysis, and also introducing the secondary analysis methods in different periods In order to determine the independent status of the standard of fair and fair treatment, the thesis makes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the investment agreement of other countries, and puts forward the conclusion that it is beneficial to our country.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4

【相似文献】