论ICSID管辖权制度的变化趋势

发布时间：2019-06-21 00:29

【摘要】：在国际投资领域特别是在私人国际投资领域,投资者与东道国之间因为投资而产生的各种争端时有发生,这些争端是否能得到及时、公正的解决,不但会影响投资者的直接利益,若处理不当还可能会影响到投资者母国与东道国之间的经济关系。为了能够及时、公正地解决私人国际投资争端,世界银行曾在上个世纪六十年代制定了《华盛顿公约》,根据这个公约,创立了“解决投资争端国际中心”,也就是"ICSID"。因此,私人投资者就可以通过国际仲裁或调解程序解决其与东道国的投资争端。虽然之后国际上又出现了一些其他的国际投资争端解决机制,但大都是在ICSID确定的框架内,加入一些国际上有关国际投资与保护的新观点。因此,进一步加深对ICSID管辖权制度的研究是符合我国经济发展趋势的,对促进提高我国在国际经济发展中的地位和影响大有裨益。根据对ICSID管辖权制度的阐述分析,结合国际经济社会的发展变化和我国的实际情况,并结合国际投资争端解决机制的最新发展,对ICSID管辖权制度的具体变化进行深入的分析,文章主要运用历史分析法和比较分析法,通过对ICSID管辖权问题的研究,使我们更清楚地了解和明确《华盛顿公约》及相关规则对ICSID管辖权的规定,以及它的变化,尤其是ICSID在裁断投资案例时的态度及倾向,使我国在签订投资协定时有所借鉴。全文共分五个部分：第一部分是对ICSID的历史沿革进行全面的详细的论述分析,这部分包括两大内容：一是产生的历史背景的阐明；二是管辖权的主要内容的理论；第二部分是对ICSID管辖权主体要件变化趋势的探讨,对ICSID管辖权主体要件的变化趋势加以研究并进行思考,并引发对国际法结构的反思；第三部分,对ICSID管辖权客体要件的变化趋势进行了系统地论述；第四部分,对CSID管辖权的发展动向和改善举措做了较为深入地分析；第五部分,对ICSID管辖权的变化对中国的影响以及在ICSID管辖权扩大化的新形式下我国所做的应对措施作详细的论述,借此维护我国在国际经济交往中的利益。经过深入的研究,得出以下结论：第一,从ICSID管辖权成立以来,ICSID管辖权主体从严格限制走向宽松。第二,《华盛顿公约》中未作出的“投资”定义范围已经发生了潜移默化的扩大。第三,ICSID管辖权的改革需要稳步推进,面对ICSID管辖权问题,要有所进退。对于争议是否应该交付ICSID解决,这个问题应该区别对待,需要在实际的模式当中进行总结。但是,我们应该清楚地认识到,一些争议不应该纳入中心管辖范围：比如对我国法律法规适用引起的争议等。。其中关于ICSID管辖权主体、客体变化趋势的研究是本课题的一大亮点,此外在ICSID管辖权改善举措上的探索也是本文的创新之处,通过对ICSID管辖权变化趋势的研究,能促进更为合理的国际投资制度的建设。
[Abstract]:In the field of international investment, especially in the field of private international investment, various disputes between investors and host countries arising from investment occur from time to time. Whether these disputes can be settled in a timely and just manner will not only affect the direct interests of investors, but also affect the economic relations between the home country of investors and the host country if handled improperly. In order to resolve private international investment disputes in a timely and just manner, the World Bank formulated the Washington Convention in the 1960s, according to which the International Center for the settlement of Investment disputes, or ICSID, was created. As a result, private investors can resolve their investment disputes with host countries through international arbitration or mediation procedures. Although some other international investment dispute settlement mechanisms have emerged in the world since then, most of them have added some new international views on international investment and protection within the framework determined by ICSID. Therefore, further deepening the study of ICSID jurisdiction system is in line with the trend of economic development in China, and is of great benefit to the promotion and improvement of China's position and influence in the development of international economy. According to the exposition and analysis of ICSID jurisdiction system, combined with the development and change of international economy and society and the actual situation of our country, and combined with the latest development of international investment dispute settlement mechanism, this paper makes a deep analysis of the specific changes of ICSID jurisdiction system. This paper mainly uses historical analysis and comparative analysis to study the jurisdiction of ICSID. It makes us more clearly understand and clarify the provisions of the Washington Convention and related rules on the jurisdiction of ICSID, as well as its changes, especially the attitude and tendency of ICSID in determining investment cases, so that our country can draw lessons from the signing of investment agreements. The full text is divided into five parts: the first part is a comprehensive and detailed discussion and analysis of the historical evolution of ICSID, which includes two main contents: one is the clarification of the historical background; the other is the theory of the main content of jurisdiction; the second part is the discussion of the changing trend of the main elements of ICSID jurisdiction, the study and reflection on the changing trend of the main elements of ICSID jurisdiction, and the reflection on the structure of international law. The third part systematically discusses the changing trend of the object elements of ICSID jurisdiction; the fourth part makes a more in-depth analysis of the development trend and improvement measures of CSID jurisdiction; the fifth part discusses in detail the influence of the change of ICSID jurisdiction on China and the countermeasures made by China under the new form of the expansion of ICSID jurisdiction, so as to safeguard China's interests in international economic exchanges. After in-depth study, the following conclusions are drawn: first, since the establishment of ICSID jurisdiction, the subject of ICSID jurisdiction has changed from strict restriction to easing. Second, the scope of the definition of "investment" not made in the Washington Convention has been expanded imperceptibly. Third, the reform of ICSID jurisdiction needs to be steadily advanced, in the face of ICSID jurisdiction, we should advance and retreat. Whether the dispute should be delivered to ICSID for resolution should be treated differently and needs to be summarized in the actual model. However, we should clearly realize that some disputes should not be included in the central jurisdiction: for example, disputes arising from the application of laws and regulations in our country. Among them, the research on the changing trend of the subject and object of ICSID jurisdiction is a bright spot of this topic. In addition, the exploration on the improvement measures of ICSID jurisdiction is also the innovation of this paper. Through the study of the changing trend of ICSID jurisdiction, it can promote the construction of a more reasonable international investment system.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996

【参考文献】